Breakpoint regions and homologous synteny blocks in chromosomes have different evolutionary histories.

The persistence of large blocks of homologous synteny and a high frequency of breakpoint reuse are distinctive features of mammalian chromosomes that are not well understood in evolutionary terms. To gain a better understanding of the evolutionary forces that affect genome architecture, synteny relationships among 10 amniotes (human, chimp, macaque, rat, mouse, pig, cattle, dog, opossum, and chicken) were compared at <1 human-Mbp resolution. Homologous synteny blocks (HSBs; N = 2233) and chromosome evolutionary breakpoint regions (EBRs; N = 1064) were identified from pairwise comparisons of all genomes. Analysis of the size distribution of HSBs shared in all 10 species' chromosomes (msHSBs) identified three (>20 Mbp) that are larger than expected by chance. Gene network analysis of msHSBs >3 human-Mbp and EBRs <1 Mbp demonstrated that msHSBs are significantly enriched for genes involved in development of the central nervous and other organ systems, whereas EBRs are enriched for genes associated with adaptive functions. In addition, we found EBRs are significantly enriched for structural variations (segmental duplications, copy number variants, and indels), retrotransposed and zinc finger genes, and single nucleotide polymorphisms. These results demonstrate that chromosome breakage in evolution is nonrandom and that HSBs and EBRs are evolving in distinctly different ways. We suggest that natural selection acts on the genome to maintain combinations of genes and their regulatory elements that are essential to fundamental processes of amniote development and biological organization. Furthermore, EBRs may be used extensively to generate new genetic variation and novel combinations of genes and regulatory elements that contribute to adaptive phenotypes.

[1]  E. Eichler,et al.  Mouse segmental duplication and copy number variation , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[2]  Richard A Flavell,et al.  Contextual regulation of inflammation: a duet by transforming growth factor-beta and interleukin-10. , 2008, Immunity.

[3]  G. Klein,et al.  Segmental duplications and evolutionary plasticity at tumor chromosome break-prone regions. , 2008, Genome research.

[4]  D. Cooper,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of chromosomal rearrangement during primate evolution , 2008, Chromosome Research.

[5]  C. Marshall,et al.  Functional and evolutionary relationships of troponin C. , 2007, Physiological genomics.

[6]  R. O’Neill,et al.  Species-specific shifts in centromere sequence composition are coincident with breakpoint reuse in karyotypically divergent lineages , 2007, Genome Biology.

[7]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  A physical map of the bovine genome , 2007, Genome Biology.

[8]  Fengtang Yang,et al.  A high utility integrated map of the pig genome , 2007, Genome Biology.

[9]  Bronwen L. Aken,et al.  Genome of the marsupial Monodelphis domestica reveals innovation in non-coding sequences , 2007, Nature.

[10]  David N. Messina,et al.  Evolutionary and Biomedical Insights from the Rhesus Macaque Genome , 2007, Science.

[11]  Jose Castresana,et al.  Is mammalian chromosomal evolution driven by regions of genome fragility? , 2006, Genome Biology.

[12]  M. Hurles,et al.  A chromosomal rearrangement hotspot can be identified from population genetic variation and is coincident with a hotspot for allelic recombination. , 2006, American journal of human genetics.

[13]  Hélène Hayes,et al.  High-resolution comparative mapping among man, cattle and mouse suggests a role for repeat sequences in mammalian genome evolution , 2006, BMC Genomics.

[14]  Pavel A Pevzner,et al.  The Fragile Breakage versus Random Breakage Models of Chromosome Evolution , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[15]  Readman Chiu,et al.  A high-resolution whole-genome cattle-human comparative map reveals details of mammalian chromosome evolution. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  D. Duboule,et al.  HoxD cluster scanning deletions identify multiple defects leading to paralysis in the mouse mutant Ironside. , 2005, Genes & development.

[17]  Gonçalo R Abecasis,et al.  Sequence features in regions of weak and strong linkage disequilibrium. , 2005, Genome research.

[18]  Murat Gunel,et al.  Sequence Variants in SLITRK1 Are Associated with Tourette's Syndrome , 2005, Science.

[19]  Phil Trinh,et al.  Chromosomal Breakpoint Reuse in Genome Sequence Rearrangement , 2005, J. Comput. Biol..

[20]  P. Pevzner,et al.  Dynamics of Mammalian Chromosome Evolution Inferred from Multispecies Comparative Maps , 2005, Science.

[21]  D. Duboule,et al.  Inversion-induced disruption of the Hoxd cluster leads to the partition of regulatory landscapes , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[22]  F. Ayala,et al.  Chromosome speciation: Humans, Drosophila, and mosquitoes , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Shreedhar Natarajan,et al.  A 1463 gene cattle-human comparative map with anchor points defined by human genome sequence coordinates. , 2004, Genome research.

[24]  D. Haussler,et al.  Hotspots of mammalian chromosomal evolution , 2004, Genome Biology.

[25]  Wen-Hsiung Li,et al.  Comment on "Chromosomal Speciation and Molecular Divergence-Accelerated Evolution in Rearranged Chromosomes" , 2003, Science.

[26]  P. D. de Jong,et al.  A cattle-human comparative map built with cattle BAC-ends and human genome sequence. , 2003, Genome research.

[27]  P. Pevzner,et al.  Human and mouse genomic sequences reveal extensive breakpoint reuse in mammalian evolution , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  N. Barton,et al.  Chromosomal Speciation and Molecular Divergence--Accelerated Evolution in Rearranged Chromosomes , 2003, Science.

[29]  David Botstein,et al.  Characteristic genome rearrangements in experimental evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Amparo Querol,et al.  Molecular characterization of a chromosomal rearrangement involved in the adaptive evolution of yeast strains. , 2002, Genome research.

[31]  M. Noor,et al.  Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Paul Richardson,et al.  Human Chromosome 19 and Related Regions in Mouse: Conservative and Lineage-Specific Evolution , 2001, Science.

[33]  Denis Duboule,et al.  Coordinate expression of the murine Hox-5 complex homoeobox-containing genes during limb pattern formation , 1989, Nature.

[34]  J. Nadeau,et al.  Lengths of chromosomal segments conserved since divergence of man and mouse. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  S. Ohno,et al.  Ancient Linkage Groups and Frozen Accidents , 1973, Nature.

[36]  Sean Ekins,et al.  Pathway mapping tools for analysis of high content data. , 2007, Methods in molecular biology.

[37]  Bernard B. Suh,et al.  Reconstructing contiguous regions of an ancestral genome. , 2006, Genome research.

[38]  Temple F. Smith,et al.  Techniques for multi-genome synteny analysis to overcome assembly limitations. , 2006, Genome informatics. International Conference on Genome Informatics.

[39]  E. Skovlund,et al.  Should we always choose a nonparametric test when comparing two apparently nonnormal distributions? , 2001, Journal of clinical epidemiology.