Quantitative myocardial infarction on delayed enhancement MRI. Part II: Clinical application of an automated feature analysis and combined thresholding infarct sizing algorithm

To compare global and regional myocardial infarction (MI) measurements on clinical gadolinium‐enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) images using human manual contouring and a computer algorithm previously validated by histopathology, and to study the degree to which visual assessment and human contouring of infarct extent agreed with the computer algorithm.

[1]  Peter Kellman,et al.  Gadolinium delayed enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance correlates with clinical measures of myocardial infarction. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  R. Kim,et al.  Viability assessment by delayed enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance: will low-dose dobutamine dull the shine? , 2004, Circulation.

[3]  Eckart Fleck,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Low-Dose Dobutamine Test Is Superior to Scar Quantification for the Prediction of Functional Recovery , 2004, Circulation.

[4]  Dan W Rettmann,et al.  Accurate and Objective Infarct Sizing by Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Canine Myocardial Infarction Model , 2022 .

[5]  M. Robson,et al.  Influence of contrast agent dose and image acquisition timing on the quantitative determination of nonviable myocardial tissue using delayed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. , 2004, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[6]  P. Kellman,et al.  Computer Quantification of Myocardial Infarction on Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2004 .

[7]  Richard D. White,et al.  Quantitative assessment of myocardial scar in delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  R. Kim,et al.  Reproducibility of Chronic Infarct Size Measurement by Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2002, Circulation.

[9]  R. Muthupillai,et al.  Assessing Myocardial Viability and Infarct Transmurality With Left Ventricular Electromechanical Mapping in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Validation by Delayed-Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2002, Circulation.

[10]  E. McVeigh,et al.  Phase‐sensitive inversion recovery for detecting myocardial infarction using gadolinium‐delayed hyperenhancement † , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  C. Higgins,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Characterization of the Peri-Infarction Zone of Reperfused Myocardial Infarction With Necrosis-Specific and Extracellular Nonspecific Contrast Media , 2001, Circulation.

[12]  O. Simonetti,et al.  An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction. , 2001, Radiology.

[13]  O. Simonetti,et al.  The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  R. Kim,et al.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of myocardium at risk: distinction between reversible and irreversible injury throughout infarct healing. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  R. Kim,et al.  Early Assessment of Myocardial Salvage by Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2000, Circulation.

[16]  O. Simonetti,et al.  Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. , 1999, Circulation.

[17]  Katherine C. Wu,et al.  Prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 1998, Circulation.

[18]  E. McVeigh,et al.  Signal-to-noise measurements in magnitude images from NMR phased arrays , 1997, Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 'Magnificent Milestones and Emerging Opportunities in Medical Engineering' (Cat. No.97CH36136).

[19]  R. Kim,et al.  Myocardial Gd-DTPA kinetics determine MRI contrast enhancement and reflect the extent and severity of myocardial injury after acute reperfused infarction. , 1996, Circulation.

[20]  R. Judd,et al.  Physiological basis of myocardial contrast enhancement in fast magnetic resonance images of 2-day-old reperfused canine infarcts. , 1995, Circulation.

[21]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[22]  F. Buonanno,et al.  Quantification of Experimental Myocardial Infarction Using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Paramagnetic Ion Contrast Enhancement in ExcisedCanine Hearts , 1982, Circulation.

[23]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  J. Lowe,et al.  The Wavefront Phenomenon of Ischemic Cell Death: 1. Myocardial Infarct Size vs Duration of Coronary Occlusion in Dogs , 1977, Circulation.

[25]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .