Evidence that both area V1 and extrastriate visual cortex contribute to symmetry perception

Bilateral symmetry is common in nature and most animals seem able to perceive it. Many species use judgements of symmetry in various behaviours, including mate selection [1-3]. Originally, however, symmetry perception may have developed as a tool for generating object-centered, rather than viewer-centered, descriptions of objects, facilitating recognition irrespective of position or orientation [4]. There is evidence that the visual system treats the orientation of axes-of-symmetry in the same way it treats in orientation of luminance-defined contours [5], suggesting that axes-of-symmetry act as 'processing tokens' [6]. We have investigated the characteristics of neural mechanisms giving rise to the perceived orientation of axes-of-symmetry. We induced tilt aftereffects with symmetrical dot patterns, eliciting perceived angle expansion and contraction effects like those usually observed with luminance-defined contours [7,8]. Induction of aftereffects during binocular rivalry resulted in a reduction of the magnitude of these effects, consistent with the aftereffects being mediated in extrastriate visual cortex, probably between visual areas V2 and MT [9]. In a second experiment in which the aftereffects were induced monocularly, their magnitudes were measured in the unadapted eye. Contraction effects transferred completely, suggesting that they are mediated by binocular cells. Expansion effects did not transfer completely, consistent with their having a monocular component. These data suggest that information about the orientation of axes-of-symmetry may be available as early as area V1, but that processing continues in extrastriate cortex.

[1]  Randolph Blake Binocular Rivalry and Conscious Visual Awareness , 1997, ICONIP.

[2]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Organization of contour from motion processing in primate visual cortex , 1994, Vision Research.

[3]  Magnus Enquist,et al.  Symmetry, beauty and evolution , 1994, Nature.

[4]  P Wenderoth,et al.  Possible Neural Substrates for Orientation Analysis and Perception , 1987, Perception.

[5]  B. Julesz Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1971 .

[6]  D C Van Essen,et al.  Information processing in the primate visual system: an integrated systems perspective. , 1992, Science.

[7]  P. Wenderoth THE ROLE OF IMPLICIT AXES OF BILATERAL SYMMETRY IN ORIENTATION PROCESSING , 1997 .

[8]  J. Gibson,et al.  Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies , 1937 .

[9]  B Jenkins Spatiotemporal Isosensitivity Fields in the Human Visual System , 1986, Perception.

[10]  T. Wiesel Neural Mechanisms of Visual Perception , 1997 .

[11]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry , 1996, Nature.

[12]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Human Discrimination of the Implicit Orientation of Simple Symmetrical Patterns , 1997, Vision Research.

[13]  C. Gross,et al.  Left and Right in Science and Art , 1978 .

[14]  J. Wagemans,et al.  Detection of visual symmetries. , 1995, Spatial vision.

[15]  Gregory Bock,et al.  Higher-order processing in the visual system , 1994 .

[16]  P Wenderoth,et al.  The role of pattern outline in bilateral symmetry detection with briefly flashed dot patterns. , 1995, Spatial vision.

[17]  A. Møller,et al.  Female swallow preference for symmetrical male sexual ornaments , 1992, Nature.

[18]  S Coren,et al.  Lateral Inhibition and Geometric Illusions , 1970, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  P Wenderoth,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for area V2 involvement in the reduction of subjective contour tilt aftereffects by binocular rivalry , 1994, Visual Neuroscience.

[20]  L. A. Symons,et al.  The Aftereffect to Relative Motion Does Not Show Interocular Transfer , 1996, Perception.

[21]  S. Palmer,et al.  Orientation and symmetry: effects of multiple, rotational, and near symmetries. , 1978, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[22]  C D Gilbert,et al.  Circuitry, architecture, and functional dynamics of visual cortex. , 1993, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Multiple analyses of orientation in the visual system , 1989 .

[24]  Nikola Kasabov,et al.  Progress in Connectionist-Based Information Systems: Proceedings of the 1997 International Conference on Neural Information Processing and Intelligent Information Systems, ICONIP 1997, Volume I, Dunedin, New Zealand, 24-28 November, 1997 , 1998, ICONIP.

[25]  R. Johnstone Female preference for symmetrical males as a by-product of selection for mate recognition , 1994, Nature.

[26]  Peter Wenderoth,et al.  The tilt illusion: Repulsion and attraction effects in the oblique meridian , 1977, Vision Research.

[27]  R. Blake,et al.  The neural site of binocular rivalry relative to the analysis of motion in the human visual system , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.