Learning about climate change solutions in the IPCC and beyond

[1]  William F. Lamb,et al.  Fast growing research on negative emissions , 2017 .

[2]  Bryan C. Pijanowski,et al.  Automated content analysis: addressing the big literature challenge in ecology and evolution , 2016 .

[3]  John P A Ioannidis,et al.  The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. , 2016, The Milbank quarterly.

[4]  Adler J. Perotte,et al.  Deep Survival Analysis , 2016, MLHC.

[5]  Katharine J Mach,et al.  A multistage crucible of revision and approval shapes IPCC policymaker summaries , 2016, Science Advances.

[6]  James D. Ford,et al.  Including indigenous knowledge and experience in IPCC assessment reports , 2016 .

[7]  Barbara Gabriella Renzi,et al.  Linguistic analysis of IPCC summaries for policymakers and associated coverage , 2016 .

[8]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Climate Change Research in View of Bibliometrics , 2016, PloS one.

[9]  Mike Hulme,et al.  1.5 [deg]C and climate research after the Paris Agreement , 2016 .

[10]  Martin Kowarsch.  A Pragmatist Orientation for the Social Sciences in Climate Policy: How to Make Integrated Economic Assessments Serve Society , 2016 .

[11]  Esteve Corbera,et al.  Patterns of authorship in the IPCC Working Group III report , 2016 .

[12]  Veronika Eyring,et al.  Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization , 2015 .

[13]  C. Field,et al.  Added value from IPCC approval sessions , 2015, Science.

[14]  The IPCC at a crossroads: Opportunities for reform , 2015, Science.

[15]  Arthur C. Petersen,et al.  New leadership for a user-friendly IPCC , 2015 .

[16]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Cartography of pathways: A new model for environmental policy assessments , 2015 .

[17]  Gerrit Hansen,et al.  Chapter scientists in the IPCC AR5 — experience and lessons learned , 2015 .

[18]  D. Victor.  Climate change: Embed the social sciences in climate policy , 2015, Nature.

[19]  Hywel T. P. Williams,et al.  Dominant frames in legacy and social media coverage of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report , 2015 .

[20]  James D. Ford,et al.  Systematic review approaches for climate change adaptation research , 2015, Regional Environmental Change.

[21]  Mark Carey,et al.  A new social contract for the IPCC , 2014 .

[22]  Piers Steel,et al.  Scientific findings as big data for research synthesis: The metaBUS project , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data).

[23]  C. Howarth,et al.  Practitioners' work and evidence in IPCC reports , 2014 .

[24]  Gian-Kasper Plattner,et al.  Climate policy: Rethink IPCC reports , 2014, Nature.

[25]  Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn,et al.  Article type: Advanced Review Article title: The IPCC and treatment of uncertainties: topics and sources of dissensus , 2014 .

[26]  D. Victor,et al.  Getting serious about categorizing countries , 2014, Science.

[27]  M. Fleurbaey,et al.  Political implications of data presentation , 2014, Science.

[28]  B. Wible.  Climate policy. IPCC lessons from Berlin. , 2014, Science.

[29]  Ottmar Edenhofer,et al.  Mapmakers and navigators, facts and values , 2014, Science.

[30]  Michael Smithson,et al.  The interpretation of IPCC probabilistic statements around the world , 2014 .

[31]  Mark Risjord,et al.  Philosophy of Social Science: A Contemporary Introduction , 2014 .

[32]  Clark A. Miller,et al.  Towards a Reflexive Turn in the Governance of Global Environmental Expertise , 2014 .

[33]  N. Höhne,et al.  Developments in national climate change mitigation legislation and strategy , 2013 .

[34]  Mary R. Anderson,et al.  Meta-Analysis for Public Management and Policy , 2013 .

[35]  T. Stocker.  Adapting the assessments , 2012, Nature Geoscience.

[36]  J. Ford,et al.  Authorship in IPCC AR5 and its implications for content: climate change and Indigenous populations in WGII , 2011, Climatic Change.

[37]  Arthur Petersen,et al.  Exploring the Impact of the IPCC Assessment Reports on Science , 2011 .

[38]  M. Bell,et al.  Meta-analysis of the association between short-term exposure to ambient ozone and respiratory hospital admissions , 2011, Environmental research letters : ERL [Web site].

[39]  Minghua Zhang,et al.  The current status of climate change research , 2011 .

[40]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Using systematic reviews to separate scientific from policy debate relevant to climate change. , 2011, American journal of preventive medicine.

[41]  Merritt Polk,et al.  Physical and economic bias in climate change research: a scientometric study of IPCC Third Assessment Report , 2011 .

[42]  T. Stocker,et al.  IPCC: cherish it, tweak it or scrap it? , 2010, Nature.

[43]  Rosemary O'Leary,et al.  The Future of Public Administration around the World: The Minnowbrook Perspective , 2010 .

[44]  Francis W. Zwiers,et al.  Guidance Note for Lead Authors of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report on Consistent Treatment of Uncertainties , 2010 .

[45]  Heather Douglas.  Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal , 2009 .

[46]  David V. Budescu,et al.  Improving Communication of Uncertainty in the Reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2009, Psychological science.

[47]  Kazuhiko Ito,et al.  Associations Between Ozone and Daily Mortality: Analysis and Meta-Analysis , 2005, Epidemiology.

[48]  John E. Hunter,et al.  CUMULATIVE RESEARCH KNOWLEDGE AND SOCIAL POLICY FORMULATION : The Critical Role of Meta-Analysis , 1996 .

[49]  Larry V. Hedges,et al.  How hard is hard science, how soft is soft science? The empirical cumulativeness of research. , 1987 .

[50]  A. Rosenberg.  Philosophy of Social Science , 2018 .