EXPLOITING 3D ULTRASOUND FOR FETAL DIAGNOSTIC PURPOSE THROUGH FACIAL LANDMARKING

In the last decade, three-dimensional landmarking has gained attention for different applications, such as face recognition for both identification of suspects and authentication, facial expression recognition, corrective and aesthetic surgery, syndrome study and diagnosis. This work focuses on the last one by proposing a geometrically-based landmark extraction algorithm aimed at diagnosing syndromes on babies before their birth. Pivotal role in this activity is the support provided by physicians and 3D ultrasound tools for working on real faces. In particular, the landmarking algorithm here proposed only relies on descriptors coming from Differential Geometry (Gaussian, mean, and principal curvatures, derivatives, coefficients of first and second fundamental forms, Shape and Curvedness indexes) and is tested on nine facial point clouds referred to nine babies taken by a three-dimensional ultrasound tool at different weeks' gestation. The results obtained, validated with the support of four practitioners, show that the localization is quite accurate. All errors lie in the range between 0 and 3.5 mm and the mean distance for each shell is in the range between 0.6 and 1.6 mm. The landmarks showing the highest errors are the ones belonging to the mouth region. Instead, the most precise landmark is the pronasal, on the nose tip, with a mean distance of 0.55 mm. Relying on current literature, this study is something missing in the state-of-the-art of the field, as present facial studies on 3D ultrasound do not work on automatic landmarking yet.

[1]  Daniela Prayer,et al.  Prenatal ultrasound and fetal MRI: the comparative value of each modality in prenatal diagnosis. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[2]  G. Tonni,et al.  Bifid uvula and familial Stickler syndrome diagnosed prenatally before the sonographic “equals sign” landmark , 2013, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[3]  D. Paladini,et al.  Posterior fossa and vermian morphometry in the characterization of fetal cerebellar abnormalities: a prospective three‐dimensional ultrasound study , 2006, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[4]  D Rotten,et al.  Two‐ and three‐dimensional sonographic assessment of the fetal face. 1. A systematic analysis of the normal face , 2004, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[5]  F. Viñals,et al.  Transfrontal three‐dimensional visualization of midline cerebral structures , 2007, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[6]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Nasal‐bone length in euploid fetuses at 16–24 weeks' gestation by three‐dimensional ultrasound , 2010, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[7]  D. Krantz,et al.  Geometric morphometric analysis of shape outlines of the normal and abnormal fetal skull using three‐dimensional sonographic multiplanar display , 2006, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[8]  Waldo Sepulveda,et al.  First‐Trimester Assessment of the Nasal Bones Using the Retronasal Triangle View , 2010, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[9]  G. Pilu,et al.  Diagnosis of midline anomalies of the fetal brain with the three‐dimensional median view , 2006, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[10]  Waldo Sepulveda,et al.  Fetal magnetic resonance imaging and three-dimensional ultrasound in clinical practice: applications in prenatal diagnosis. , 2012, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[11]  Thomas D Shipp,et al.  Assessment of the third‐trimester fetus using 3‐dimensional volumes: A pilot study , 2007, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[12]  W. Sepulveda,et al.  Absent mandibular gap in the retronasal triangle view: a clue to the diagnosis of micrognathia in the first trimester , 2012, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[13]  T R Nelson,et al.  Fetal lip and primary palate: three-dimensional versus two-dimensional US. , 2000, Radiology.

[14]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Frontomaxillary facial angle at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks' gestation—reproducibility of measurements , 2007, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[15]  W Sepulveda,et al.  Retronasal triangle: a sonographic landmark for the screening of cleft palate in the first trimester , 2010, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[16]  G Captier,et al.  Sonographic assessment of normal fetal palate using three‐dimensional imaging: a new technique , 2007, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[17]  D. Rotten,et al.  The fetal mandible: a 2D and 3D sonographic approach to the diagnosis of retrognathia and micrognathia , 2002, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[18]  H. Wong,et al.  Examination of the secondary palate on stored 3D ultrasound volumes of the fetal face , 2009, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[19]  Julian N Robinson,et al.  Is the starting section for 3D volume acquisition in the first trimester relevant in the post hoc analysis of aneuploidy screening markers and fetal anatomy? , 2011, Prenatal diagnosis.

[20]  W Sepulveda,et al.  First‐trimester diagnosis of cleft lip and palate using three‐dimensional ultrasound , 2012, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[21]  Andrea J. van Doorn,et al.  Surface shape and curvature scales , 1992, Image Vis. Comput..

[22]  A. Tomei,et al.  Fetal MRI as a complement to US in the evaluation of cleft lip and palate , 2011, La radiologia medica.

[23]  G. Tonni,et al.  OmniView Algorithm , 2012, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[24]  A. Baschat,et al.  Standardization of the first‐trimester fetal cardiac examination using spatiotemporal image correlation with tomographic ultrasound and color Doppler imaging , 2009, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[25]  Waldo Sepulveda,et al.  Fetal magnetic resonance imaging and three-dimensional ultrasound in clinical practice: general aspects. , 2012, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.