Predicting Proximal Femoral Strength Using Structural Engineering Models

Hip fracture related to osteoporosis and metastatic disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. An accurate and precise method of predicting proximal femoral strength and fracture location would be useful for research and clinical studies of hip fracture. The goals of this study were to develop a structural modeling technique that accurately predicts proximal femoral strength; to evaluate the accuracy and precision of this predicted strength on an independent data set; and to evaluate the ability of this technique to predict fracture location. Fresh human cadaveric proximal femora with and without metastatic lesions were studied using computed tomography scan-based three-dimensional structural models and mechanical testing to failure under single-limb stance-type loading. The models understated proximal femoral strength by an average of 444 N, and the precision of the predicted strength was ± 1900 N. Therefore, the ability to predict hip strength in an individual subject is limited primarily by the level of precision, rather than accuracy. This level of precision is likely to be sufficient for many studies of hip strength. Finally, these models predict fractures involving the subcapital and cervical regions, consistent with most fractures produced experimentally under single-limb stance-type loading.

[1]  Joseph Edward Shigley,et al.  Mechanical engineering design , 1972 .

[2]  S. Glantz Primer of applied regression and analysis of variance / Stanton A. Glantz, Bryan K. Slinker , 1990 .

[3]  J. Keyak,et al.  Comparison of in situ and in vitro CT scan-based finite element model predictions of proximal femoral fracture load. , 2003, Medical engineering & physics.

[4]  E. Noordijk,et al.  Comparative analysis of risk factors for pathological fracture with femoral metastases. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[5]  J. Tehranzadeh,et al.  Mechanical properties, density and quantitative CT scan data of trabecular bone with and without metastases. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  R. K. Beals,et al.  FEMORAL METASTASES AND FRACTURES FROM BREAST CANCER. , 1964, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[7]  H. Skinner,et al.  Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  R. K. Beals,et al.  Prophylactic internal fixation of the femur in metastatic breast cancer , 1971, Cancer.

[9]  A. Burstein,et al.  The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. , 1975, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Evaluation of orthogonal mechanical properties and density of human trabecular bone from the major metaphyseal regions with materials testing and computed tomography , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[11]  H. Skinner,et al.  Effect of force direction on femoral fracture load for two types of loading conditions , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[12]  J H Keyak,et al.  Prediction of fracture location in the proximal femur using finite element models. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[13]  C. Ruff,et al.  Experimental testing of a DEXA‐derived curved beam model of the proximal femur , 1998, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[14]  J. Zuckerman,et al.  Mortality Risk After Hip Fracture , 2003, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[15]  G U Rao,et al.  Predicting femoral neck strength from bone mineral data. A structural approach. , 1990, Investigative radiology.

[16]  C Ronald MacKenzie,et al.  Hip fractures among the elderly: causes, consequences and control , 2003, Ageing Research Reviews.

[17]  R. Sachs,et al.  The pathology and treatment of metastatic disease of the femur. , 1982, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  W. Hayes,et al.  Evaluation of finite element analysis for prediction of the strength reduction due to metastatic lesions in the femoral neck. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  J. Lane,et al.  Osteoporosis: a review. , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  S. Furner,et al.  Musculoskeletal Conditions in the United States , 1992 .

[21]  A. Cappello,et al.  Prediction of Hip Fracture Can Be Significantly Improved by a Single Biomedical Indicator , 2002, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  J. Tehranzadeh,et al.  Relationships between material properties and CT scan data of cortical bone with and without metastatic lesions. , 2003, Medical engineering & physics.

[23]  W. Hayes,et al.  Predicting pathologic fracture risk in the management of metastatic bone defects. , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  J H Keyak,et al.  Postfailure compressive behavior of tibial trabecular bone in three anatomic directions. , 1996, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[25]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Musculo-skeletal loading conditions at the hip during walking and stair climbing. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  J H Keyak,et al.  Estimation of material properties in the equine metacarpus with use of quantitative computed tomography , 1994, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[27]  W. Hayes,et al.  Density predicts the activity-dependent failure load of proximal femora with defects , 1999, Skeletal Radiology.

[28]  J. Keyak Improved prediction of proximal femoral fracture load using nonlinear finite element models. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[29]  H K Genant,et al.  Osteoporosis. Current techniques and recent developments in quantitative bone densitometry. , 1991, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[30]  J H Keyak,et al.  Relationships between femoral fracture loads for two load configurations. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  H. Eyre,et al.  Nonoperative management of femoral, humeral, and acetabular metastases in patients with breast carcinoma , 1980, Cancer.

[32]  P. Alffram AN EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDY OF CERVICAL AND TROCHANTERIC FRACTURES OF THE FEMUR IN AN URBAN POPULATION. ANALYSIS OF 1,664 CASES WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO ETIOLOGIC FACTORS. , 1964, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[33]  J. S. Keene,et al.  Metastatic breast cancer in the femur. A search for the lesion at risk of fracture. , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[34]  H. Mirels Metastatic Disease in Long Bones A Proposed Scoring System for Diagnosing Impending Pathologic Fractures , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[35]  A. Cappello,et al.  Risk of fracture in elderly patients: a new predictive index based on bone mineral density and finite element analysis. , 1999, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[36]  L. Kozak,et al.  National hospital discharge survey: 2004 annual summary with detailed diagnosis and procedure data. , 2006, Vital and health statistics. Series 13, Data from the National Health Survey.

[37]  C. Ruff,et al.  Curved beam model of the proximal femur for estimating stress using dual‐energy x‐ray absorptiometry derived structural geometry , 1996, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[38]  C. Miller,et al.  Survival and ambulation following hip fracture. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[39]  J. Kanis,et al.  Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk , 2002, The Lancet.

[40]  W C Hayes,et al.  The use of quantitative computed tomography to estimate risk of fracture of the hip from falls. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[41]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.