Intravascular lithotripsy and Impella support to assist complex LM angioplasty.

[1]  C. Tamburino,et al.  Coronary lithotripsy for failed rotational atherectomy, cutting balloon, scoring balloon, and ultra‐high‐pressure non‐compliant balloon , 2019, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[2]  D. Kereiakes,et al.  Intravascular lithotripsy‐assisted Impella insertion: A case report , 2019, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[3]  C. Di Mario,et al.  A Prospective Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy-Enabled Vascular Access for Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[4]  D. Scheinert,et al.  Primary outcomes and mechanism of action of intravascular lithotripsy in calcified, femoropopliteal lesions: Results of Disrupt PAD II , 2018, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[5]  F. Bedogni,et al.  Transfemoral aortic valve implantation following lithoplasty of iliac artery in a patient with poor vascular access , 2018, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[6]  F. Burzotta,et al.  Hemodynamics and its predictors during Impella-protected PCI in high risk patients with reduced ejection fraction. , 2019, International journal of cardiology.

[7]  C. Di Mario,et al.  Lithoplasty-assisted transfemoral aortic valve implantation. , 2018, European heart journal.

[8]  J. Abbott,et al.  Optimizing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Calcified Lesions: Insights From Optical Coherence Tomography of Atherectomy. , 2018, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[9]  C. Di Mario,et al.  Lithotripsy-assisted transfemoral aortic valve implantation. , 2018, European heart journal.

[10]  J. Cigarroa,et al.  A Practical Approach to Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Interventional Perspective. , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[11]  Samin K. Sharma,et al.  Impact of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump on prognostically important clinical outcomes in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (from the PROTECT II randomized trial). , 2014, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  W. O’Neill,et al.  Real‐world use of the Impella 2.5 circulatory support system in complex high‐risk percutaneous coronary intervention: The USpella Registry , 2012, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[13]  I. Palacios,et al.  A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial of Hemodynamic Support With Impella 2.5 Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The PROTECT II Study , 2012, Circulation.

[14]  D. Wagner,et al.  Supported high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the Impella 2.5 device the Europella registry. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.