Co‐occurrence in nature of different clones of the social amoeba, Dictyostelium discoideum

The social amoeba, Dictyostelium discoideum, produces a multicellular fruiting body and has become a model system for cell–cell interactions such as signalling, adhesion and development. However, unlike most multicellular organisms, it forms by aggregation of cells and, in the laboratory, forms genetic chimeras where there may be competition among clones. Here we show that chimera formation is also likely in nature, because different clones commonly co‐occur on a very small scale. This suggests that D. discoideum will likely have evolved strategies for competing in chimeras, and that the function of some developmental genes will be competitive. Natural chimerism also makes D. discoideum a good model organism for the investigation of issues relating to coexistence and conflict between cells.

[1]  J. Sivinski.  Book Review: Evolution of Social Insect Colonies: Sex Allocation and Kin Selection. , 1997 .

[2]  Doug P. Armstrong,et al.  Why don't cellular slime molds cheat? , 1984 .

[3]  G. McCracken,et al.  ON ESTIMATING RELATEDNESS USING GENETIC MARKERS , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  R E Michod,et al.  Cooperation and conflict in the evolution of individuality. II. Conflict mediation , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  K. Raper,et al.  THE ACRASIEAE IN NATURE. III. OCCURRENCE AND DISTRIBUTION IN FORESTS OF EASTERN NORTH AMERICA , 1965 .

[6]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Kin conflict over caste determination in social Hymenoptera , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[7]  R. Kessin,et al.  Dictyostelium amoebae lacking an F-box protein form spores rather than stalk in chimeras with wild type. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  R. Kessin.  Dictyostelium: Evolution, Cell Biology, and the Development of Multicellularity , 2001 .

[9]  S. Stephenson,et al.  Cellular slime molds in forest soils of southwestern Virginia. , 1986 .

[10]  S. Stephenson,et al.  The vertical distribution of dictyostelids and myxomycetes in the soil/litter microhabitat , 1996 .

[11]  J. Cavender.  Cellular Slime Molds of the Southern Appalachians , 1980 .

[12]  Edward E. Southwick,et al.  Bees as Superorganisms: An Evolutionary Reality , 1992 .

[13]  T. Seeley.  The honey bee colony as a superorganism. , 1989 .

[14]  W. M. Wheeler,et al.  The ant‐colony as an organism , 1911 .

[15]  Richard E. Michod,et al.  Cooperation and Conflict in the Evolution of Individuality. I. Multilevel Selection of the Organism , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[16]  Altruism, selfishness, and heterocytosis in cellular slime molds , 1990 .

[17]  D. Barkley.  Adenosine-3', 5'-Phosphate: Identification as Acrasin in a Species of Cellular Slime Mold , 1969, Science.

[18]  Eörs Szathmáry,et al.  The Major Transitions in Evolution , 1997 .

[19]  P. A. Moritz,et al.  Bees as Superorganisms , 1992, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[20]  D. Roze,et al.  Altruism, Cheating, and Anticheater Adaptations in Cellular Slime Molds , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[21]  L W Buss,et al.  Somatic cell parasitism and the evolution of somatic tissue compatibility. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  R. Lenski,et al.  Loss of social behaviors by myxococcus xanthus during evolution in an unstructured habitat. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  L. Keller.  Levels of selection in evolution , 1999 .

[24]  F. Kuserk,et al.  An Examination of the Methods for Isolating Cellular Slime Molds (Dictyosteliida) from Soil Samples , 1977 .

[25]  Somatic and germ cell parasitism in a colonial ascidian: possible role for a highly polymorphic allorecognition system. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  S. Stephenson,et al.  Cellular slime molds in forest soils of West Virginia , 1990 .

[27]  J. Strassmann,et al.  KIN SELECTION AND SOCIAL INSECTS , 1998 .

[28]  K. Raper,et al.  THE ACRASIEAE IN NATURE. I. ISOLATION. , 1965, American journal of botany.

[29]  M. Sussman,et al.  Cellular Slime Molds , 1974 .

[30]  S. Stephenson,et al.  CELLULAR SLIME MOLDS IN FOREST SOILS OF , 1990 .

[31]  R. Crozier,et al.  Genetic Intrigues. (Book Reviews: Evolution of Social Insect Colonies. Sex Allocation and Kin Selection.) , 1997 .

[32]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Altruism and social cheating in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum , 2000, Nature.

[33]  K. Raper,et al.  THE ACRASIEAE IN NATURE. II. FOREST SOIL AS A PRIMARY HABITAT. , 1965, American journal of botany.

[34]  R. Grosberg,et al.  One cell, two cell, red cell, blue cell: The persistence of a unicellular stage in multicellular life histories. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[35]  B. Charlesworth.  Levels of Selection in Evolution , 2000, Heredity.

[36]  R. Trivers,et al.  Haploidploidy and the evolution of the social insect. , 1976, Science.

[37]  Y. Harada,et al.  Evolutionarily stable stalk to spore ratio in cellular slime molds and the law of equalization in net incomes. , 1990, Journal of theoretical biology.

[38]  E. Sober,et al.  Reviving the superorganism. , 1989, Journal of theoretical biology.

[39]  L. Keller.  Social evolution in ants , 1996 .

[40]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Altruism and Related Phenomena, Mainly in Social Insects , 1972 .

[41]  D. Queller,et al.  Relatedness and the fraternal major transitions. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[42]  K. Foster,et al.  The costs and benefits of being a chimera , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  L. Buss,et al.  Slime molds, ascidians, and the utility of evolutionary theory. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  W. Hamilton.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[45]  J. Bonner,et al.  The acrasin activity of adenosine-3',5'-cyclic phosphate. , 1967, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  W. Hamilton.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[47]  D. Francis,et al.  Genetic structure of a natural population of Dictyostelium discoideum, a cellular slime mould , 1993, Molecular ecology.

[48]  Denis Roze,et al.  Cooperation and conflict in the evolution of individuality. IV. Conflict mediation and evolvability in Volvox carteri. , 2003, Bio Systems.

[49]  Patrick Abbot,et al.  Genetic conflict and conditional altruism in social aphid colonies , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.