Getting Parents Involved: A Field Experiment in Deprived Schools

This article provides evidence that schools can influence parents' involvement in education, and this has causal effects on pupils' behaviour. Furthermore, it shows how the impact of more involved parents on their children is amplified at the class level by peer group interaction. We build on a large-scale controlled experiment run in a French deprived educational district, where parents of middle-school children were invited to participate in a simple program of parent-school meetings on how to get better involved in their children's education. At the end of the school year, we find that treated families have increased their school-and home-based involvement activities. In turn, pupils of treatment classes have developed more positive behaviour and attitudes in school, notably in terms of truancy and disciplinary sanctions (with effects-size around 15% of a standard deviation). However, test scores did not improve under the intervention. Our results suggest that parents are an input for schooling policies and it is possible to influence important aspects of the schooling process at low cost.

[1]  Frederico Finan,et al.  Neighborhood Peer Effects in Secondary School Enrollment Decisions , 2009, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[2]  Kevin Lang,et al.  Does School Integration Generate Peer Effects? Evidence from Boston's Metco Program , 2004, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[3]  Rukmini,et al.  Departnnent of Economics Working Paper Series Pitfalls of Participatory Programs : Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation in Education in India , 2011 .

[4]  Ryo Nakajima,et al.  Measuring Peer Eects on Youth Smoking Behavior , 2007 .

[5]  Kathleen V. Hoover-dempsey,et al.  Parental Involvement in Children's Education: Why Does it Make a Difference? , 1995, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[6]  Petra E. Todd,et al.  The Production of Cognitive Achievement in Children: Home, School, and Racial Test Score Gaps , 2007, Journal of Human Capital.

[7]  J. Eccles,et al.  Peer Effects in Drug Use and Sex Among College Students , 2005, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[8]  C. Hoxby,et al.  Peer Effects in the Classroom: Learning from Gender and Race Variation , 2000 .

[9]  R. Moffitt Policy Interventions, Low-Level Equilibria, and So-cial Interactions , 1999 .

[10]  H. Coleman,et al.  Residential Mobility Trends in France, 1973-2006. New Estimates , 2009 .

[11]  Esther Duflo,et al.  Peer Effects, Teacher Incentives, and the Impact of Tracking: Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation in Kenya , 2008 .

[12]  S. Raphael,et al.  School-Based Peer Effects and Juvenile Behavior , 1997, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[13]  N. Hill,et al.  Parental involvement in middle school: a meta-analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. , 2009, Developmental psychology.

[14]  John N. Friedman,et al.  How Does Your Kindergarten Classroom Affect Your Earnings? Evidence from Project Star , 2010, The quarterly journal of economics.

[15]  J. Heckman,et al.  The Effects of Cognitive and Noncognitive Abilities on Labor Market Outcomes and Social Behavior , 2006, Journal of Labor Economics.

[16]  Bruce Sacerdote,et al.  The Social Multiplier , 2002 .

[17]  Jakob Svensson,et al.  Power to the People: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment of a Community-Based Monitoring Project in Uganda , 2007 .

[18]  Thierry Magnac,et al.  Set Identified Linear Models , 2011 .

[19]  Ç. Kâğıtçıbaşı,et al.  Long-term effects of early intervention: Turkish low-income mothers and children , 2001 .

[20]  S. Walker,et al.  The long-term follow-up of severely malnourished children who participated in an intervention program. , 1994, Child development.

[21]  Carmit Segal,et al.  Working When No One Is Watching: Motivation, Test Scores, and Economic Success , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Kathleen V. Hoover-dempsey,et al.  Why Do Parents Become Involved in Their Children’s Education? , 1997 .

[23]  Francesco Avvisati,et al.  Parental Involvement in School: A Literature Review , 2010 .

[24]  S. Carrell,et al.  Externalities in the Classroom: How Children Exposed to Domestic Violence Affect Everyone&Apos;S Kids , 2008 .

[25]  David M. Zimmer,et al.  After-School Supervision and Children's Cognitive Achievement , 2008 .

[26]  D. Olds Prenatal and Infancy Home Visiting by Nurses: From Randomized Trials to Community Replication , 2002, Prevention Science.

[27]  A. Schwartz,et al.  Racial test score gaps , 2011 .

[28]  G. Brunello,et al.  Non-Cognitive Skills and Personality Traits: Labour Market Relevance and Their Development in Education & Training Systems , 2011, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[29]  J. Svensson,et al.  POWER TO THE PEOPLE: EVIDENCE FROM A RANDOMIZED FIELD EXPERIMENT ON COMMUNITY-BASED MONITORING IN UGANDA∗ , 2008 .

[30]  Selcuk R. Sirin Socioeconomic Status and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review of Research , 2005 .

[31]  Angela L. Duckworth,et al.  The Economics and Psychology of Personality Traits , 2008, The Journal of Human Resources.

[32]  A. Aizer Home Alone: Supervision after School and Child Behavior , 2002 .

[33]  David S. Lee Training, Wages, and Sample Selection: Estimating Sharp Bounds on Treatment Effects , 2005 .

[34]  Martin R. West,et al.  The Non-Cognitive Returns to Class Size , 2008 .

[35]  C. DesForges,et al.  The Impact of Parental Involvement, Parental Support and Family Education on Pupil Achievement and Adjustment: a literature review , 2003 .

[36]  C. Manski Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem , 1993 .

[37]  Erik Lindqvist,et al.  The Labor Market Returns to Cognitive and Noncognitive Ability: Evidence from the Swedish Enlistment , 2009 .

[38]  Ryo Nakajima,et al.  Measuring Peer Effects on Youth Smoking Behavior , 2004 .

[39]  James J. Heckman,et al.  Estimating the Technology of Cognitive and Noncognitive Skill Formation , 2010, Econometrica : journal of the Econometric Society.