Transforming Society Through Pilot and Demonstration Projects

[1]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science , 1992 .

[2]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Local niche experimentation in energy transitions: a theoretical and empirical exploration of proximity advantages and disadvantages , 2010 .

[3]  Marianne Ryghaug,et al.  Temporal echoes and cross-geography policy effects: Multiple levels of transition governance and the electric vehicle breakthrough , 2020, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.

[4]  E. Heiskanen,et al.  Community energy initiatives to alleviate fuel poverty: the material politics of Energy Cafés , 2018 .

[5]  N. Frantzeskaki,et al.  Nature-Based Solutions Accelerating Urban Sustainability Transitions in Cities: Lessons from Dresden, Genk and Stockholm Cities , 2017 .

[6]  F. Geels The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms , 2011 .

[7]  Tom Hargreaves,et al.  Ecologies of participation in socio-technical change: The case of energy system transitions , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[8]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Co-evolutionary and multi-level dynamics in transitions: The transformation of aviation systems and the shift from propeller to turbojet (1930–1970) , 2006 .

[9]  Marianne Ryghaug,et al.  Material participation and the smart grid: Exploring different modes of articulation , 2015 .

[10]  S. Sorrell,et al.  Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization , 2017, Science.

[11]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930) , 2005, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[12]  Benjamin Sovacool,et al.  Vehicle-to-Grid , 2019 .

[13]  Jacopo Torriti,et al.  Peak Energy Demand and Demand Side Response , 2015 .

[14]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society , 1984 .

[15]  Jochen Markard,et al.  Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework , 2008 .

[16]  S. Jasanoff Just transitions: A humble approach to global energy futures , 2017 .

[17]  T. H. Christensen,et al.  From consumer to prosumer: Enrolling users into a Norwegian PV pilot , 2017 .

[18]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Niche construction and empowerment through socio-political work. A meta-analysis of six low-carbon technology cases , 2016 .

[19]  Thomas Berker,et al.  A traveler’s guide to smart grids and the social sciences☆ , 2015 .

[20]  F. Geels From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory , 2004 .

[21]  Marianne Ryghaug,et al.  Creating energy citizenship through material participation , 2018, Social studies of science.

[22]  Thea Sofie Melhuus Hojem,et al.  Articulations of sustainability transition agency. Mundane transition work among consulting engineers , 2018 .

[23]  Johan Schot,et al.  Deep Transitions: Emergence, Acceleration, Stabilization and Directionality , 2016, Research Policy.

[24]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Feelings of Discontent and the Promise of Middle Range Theory for STS , 2007 .

[25]  Kacper Szulecki Conceptualizing energy democracy , 2018 .

[26]  Rob Raven,et al.  What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability , 2012 .

[27]  E. Chu,et al.  Climate Change in Cities: Innovations in Multi-Level Governance , 2018 .

[28]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[29]  G. Seyfang,et al.  Up, Down, round and round: Connecting Regimes and Practices in Innovation for Sustainability , 2013 .

[30]  Rolf Naber,et al.  Scaling up sustainable energy innovations , 2017 .

[31]  Jathan Sadowski,et al.  The anti-politics of smart energy regimes , 2020 .

[32]  A. Wilkie,et al.  Inventing the social , 2018 .

[33]  M. Wolsink The research agenda on social acceptance of distributed generation in smart grids: Renewable as common pool resources , 2012 .

[34]  Eleftheria Vasileiadou,et al.  Transitions: Taking Complexity Seriously , 2010 .

[35]  Marianne Ryghaug,et al.  Orchestrating households as collectives of participation in the distributed energy transition: New empirical and conceptual insights , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[36]  M. Kearnes,et al.  Remaking participation : science, environment and emergent publics , 2016 .

[37]  F. Geels Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[38]  Trevor Pinch,et al.  How users matter : The co-construction of users and technologies , 2003 .

[39]  Claudia R. Binder,et al.  Challenges Ahead: Understanding, Assessing, Anticipating and Governing Foreseeable Societal Tensions to Support Accelerated Low-Carbon Transitions in Europe , 2018 .

[40]  Richard Buchanan,et al.  Wicked Problems in Design Thinking , 1992 .

[41]  Kjetil Rommetveit,et al.  Who ‘Uses’ Smart Grids? The Evolving Nature of User Representations in Layered Infrastructures , 2018, Sustainability.

[42]  Andrew Hargadon,et al.  When Innovations Meet Institutions: Edison and the Design of the Electric Light , 2001 .

[43]  Noel Longhurst,et al.  Participation in Transition(s): Reconceiving Public Engagements in Energy Transitions as Co-Produced, Emergent and Diverse , 2016 .

[44]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy , 2001 .

[45]  Knut H. Sørensen,et al.  Making Technology Our Own?: Domesticating Technology Into Everyday Life , 1996 .

[46]  Kate Burningham,et al.  Imagined publics and engagement around renewable energy technologies in the UK , 2012 .

[47]  N. Marres What If Nothing Happens? Street Trials of Intelligent Cars as Experiments in Participation , 2017, TechnoScienceSociety.

[48]  Johan Schot,et al.  The roles of users in shaping transitions to new energy systems , 2016, Nature Energy.

[49]  Marianne Ryghaug,et al.  Expanding the scope and implications of energy research: A guide to key themes and concepts from the Social Sciences and Humanities , 2020 .

[50]  Harold Maurice Collins,et al.  Public Experiments and Displays of Virtuosity: The Core-Set Revisited , 1988 .

[51]  Heidrun Åm The sun also rises in Norway: Solar scientists as transition actors , 2015 .

[52]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology , 1989 .

[53]  F. Geels The role of the cities in technological transitions: analytical clarifications and historical examples , 2010 .

[54]  Benjamin Sovacool,et al.  Electricity market design for the prosumer era , 2016, Nature Energy.

[55]  T. Pallesen,et al.  Organizing consumers for a decarbonized electricity system: Calculative agencies and user scripts in a Danish demonstration project , 2018 .

[56]  B. Sovacool,et al.  Sociotechnical matters: Reviewing and integrating science and technology studies with energy social science , 2020 .

[57]  Hartmut Rosa,et al.  Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity , 2013 .

[58]  N. Marres Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics , 2012 .

[59]  Harriet Bulkeley,et al.  Maintaining Climate Change Experiments: Urban Political Ecology and the Everyday Reconfiguration of Urban Infrastructure , 2013 .

[60]  S. Jasanoff Science and Public Reason , 2012 .

[61]  Toke Haunstrup Christensen,et al.  The challenge of time shifting energy demand practices: Insights from Denmark , 2016 .

[62]  P. Newell,et al.  The politics of accelerating low-carbon transitions: Towards a new research agenda , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[63]  C. Hinrichs,et al.  Bioenergy experts and their imagined “obligatory publics” in the United States: Implications for public engagement and participation , 2017 .

[64]  M. Ornetzeder,et al.  The Role of Experiments and Demonstration Projects in Efforts of Upscaling: An Analysis of Two Projects Attempting to Reconfigure Production and Consumption in Energy and Mobility , 2019, Sustainability.