Standard deviation as the optimization criterion in the OptD method and its influence on the generated DTM

Reduction of the measurement dataset is one of the current issues related to constantly developing technologies that provide large datasets, e.g. laser scanning. It could seems that presence and evolution of processors computer, increase of hard drive capacity etc. is the solution for development of such large datasets. And in fact it is, however, the “lighter” datasets are easier to work with. Additionally, reduced datasets can be exchange/transfer/download faster via internet or cloud stored. Therefore the issue of data reduction algorithms/methods is continuously relevant. In this paper authors presented the results of the study whether the standard deviation of measurement data can be used as optimization criterion in the process of dataset reduction conducted by means of the OptD method. The OptD is based on the cartographic generalization methods. In iterative process irrelevant points are being removed and those that characteristic are being preserved, what in results means more points in complex fragments of scanned object/surface and less in flat/uncomplicated area. Obtained reduced datasets were then the basis for DTMs generation. For DTMs assessment RMSE was calculated.

[1]  Zhilin Li VARIATION OF THE ACCURACY OF DIGITAL TERRAIN MODELS WITH SAMPLING INTERVAL , 2006 .

[2]  Luis Ángel Ruiz Fernández,et al.  Analysis of the factors affecting LiDAR DTM accuracy in a steep shrub area , 2011, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[3]  S. Standard GUIDE TO THE EXPRESSION OF UNCERTAINTY IN MEASUREMENT , 2006 .

[4]  V. K. Prasad Digital Terrain Modeling: Principles and Methodology , 2009 .

[5]  Wioleta Błaszczak-Bąk,et al.  Reduction of measurement data before Digital Terrain Model generation vs. DTM generalisation , 2018, Survey Review.

[6]  Wioleta Błaszczak-Bąk,et al.  The OptD-multi method in LiDAR processing , 2017 .

[7]  David H. Douglas,et al.  ALGORITHMS FOR THE REDUCTION OF THE NUMBER OF POINTS REQUIRED TO REPRESENT A DIGITIZED LINE OR ITS CARICATURE , 1973 .

[8]  Wioleta Blaszczak-Bak,et al.  New Optimum Dataset method in LiDAR processing , 2016 .

[9]  A. Zięba,et al.  Standard Deviation of the Mean of Autocorrelated Observations Estimated with the Use of the Autocorrelation Function Estimated From the Data , 2011 .

[10]  P. Axelsson DEM Generation from Laser Scanner Data Using Adaptive TIN Models , 2000 .

[11]  Czesław Suchocki,et al.  Terrestrial Laser Scanner as a Tool for Assessment of Saturation and Moisture Movement in Building Materials , 2018 .

[12]  S A Bell,et al.  A beginner's guide to uncertainty of measurement. , 2001 .

[13]  Wioleta Błaszczak-Bąk,et al.  The Optimum Dataset method – examples of the application , 2018 .

[14]  Qing Zhu,et al.  Digital terrain modeling - principles and methodology , 2004 .