The Repeatability of MNREAD Acuity Charts and Variability at Different Test Distances

Purpose. The purposes of this study are to establish the repeatability of the MNREAD acuity charts in a normal adult population and to determine the coefficient of repeatability for reading acuity, reading speed, and critical print size. The study also investigates how changing the working distance affects these parameters. Methods. Thirty normal young adults (mean age, 23.3 years) participated. Test–retest repeatability was assessed at 40 cm over two sessions by the same examiner using MNREAD charts 1 and 2. Additional measurements were also carried out at 24 cm and 52 cm working distances. The distance and the version of the chart used were randomized. Results. The coefficient of repeatability was found to be ± 0.05 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) for reading acuity, ± 0.12 logMAR for critical print size, and ± 8.6 words per minute for reading speed. Reading acuity and critical print size changed significantly with testing distance (p = 0.001). No changes were found in the reading speed at the different test distances (p = 0.27). Conclusions. The MNREAD acuity charts can be used reliably to measure reading acuity, reading speed, and critical print size in a normal adult population.

[1]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[2]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[3]  Anders Sjöström,et al.  Screening for amblyopia and strabismus with the Lang II stereo card. , 2002, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[4]  P. Denieul,et al.  Effects of stimulus vergence on mean accommodation response, microfluctuations of accommodation and optical quality of the human eye , 1982, Vision Research.

[5]  P. Artes,et al.  Face recognition in age related macular degeneration: perceived disability, measured disability, and performance with a bioptic device , 2002, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  Fred W Fitzke,et al.  How sensitive to clinical change are ETDRS logMAR visual acuity measurements? , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  M G Maguire,et al.  Laser-induced drusen reduction improves visual function at 1 year. Choroidal Neovascularization Prevention Trial Research Group. , 1999, Ophthalmology.

[8]  A. Hill,et al.  Vistech VCTS 6500 Charts—Within- and Between-Session Reliability , 1991, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[9]  E. Freeman,et al.  Anomalies of Visual Acuity in Relation to Stimulus-Distance* , 1932 .

[10]  I L Bailey,et al.  New Design Principles for Visual Acuity Letter Charts* , 1976, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[11]  Michael Wall,et al.  Visual acuity scored by the letter-by-letter or probit methods has lower retest variability than the line assignment method , 1997, Eye.

[12]  G E Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading. XV: Font effects in normal and low vision. , 1996, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  Sanae Asonuma,et al.  Reading ability after macular translocation surgery with 360-degree retinotomy. , 2002, American journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  L C MEAD,et al.  Visual acuity and distance of observation. , 1945, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  M. Bullimore,et al.  Visual acuity and the accuracy of the accommodative response , 2002, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[16]  Ugo Menchini,et al.  Reading performance in patients with retinitis pigmentosa: a study using the MNREAD charts. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[17]  Jan E. Lovie-Kitchin,et al.  Repeatability and Intercorrelations of Standard Vision Tests as a Function of Age , 2000, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[18]  Frank K. Moss,et al.  The Dependency of Visual Acuity upon Stimulus-Distance , 1933 .

[19]  Beebe-Center Jg,et al.  Visual acuity and distance of observation. , 1945 .

[20]  G Heron,et al.  Relationship between visual acuity and observation distance , 1995, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[21]  Ugo Menchini,et al.  Reading acuity in children: evaluation and reliability using MNREAD charts. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[22]  I L Bailey,et al.  Repeatability of Visual Acuity Measurement , 1998, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[23]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Reliability and Consistency of Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity Measures in Advanced Eye Disease , 2005, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.