Comparison ofNumerical Techniques forRectangular Microstrip Patch Antenna

Intoday's scenario higher integration and approach remains themostappropriate formoreaccurate smaller layout size arethetwomajor trends inRF and determination of thelineparameters. Therefore, Microwave industry, leadtomoreprominent rolein numerical techniques arechosen onthebasis oftrade- electromagnetic highordereffects. Recentyearsthe offsbetween accuracy, speed, storage requirement and important inthedevelopment ofnumerical techniques has versatility andareoften structure-dependent. Theauthors beentheversatility ofthemethod. Inthis paper, wehave presented thefewNumerical techniques tocompute such . . . ~~~~~~~~effects inMicrowave InteratedCircuits, highlighting present thevarious numerical techniques tocompute suchegr ghg effects inMicrowave Integrated Circuit baseddesigns their specific features andcomparison ofnumerical highlighting their specific features withcomparison of techniques forrectangular Microstrip Patch Antenna and numerical techniques fordesign ofrectangular Microstrip PatchAntenna. Herewe arecompared fewnumerical techniques, inthisFinite Element Methodisa more II. ELECTROMAGNETIC NUMERICALMETHODS powerful andversatile, morestorage requirement, less CPUtime. A.Finite Difference TimeDomain(FDTD) ' ~~~~antenna beampattern, tomention afew.Theliterature millimeter-wave circuits uptoW-bandhavesuccessfully onMM ialed soare stophbta beendesigned using onlystatic results. Nevertheless, atcopensvbilgrhyApatlbbigahys Microwave andmillimeter-wave frequencies, adynamic prvddbAam (4.Teroduefrplyn