A Multidimensional Commitment Model of Volitional Systems Adoption and Usage Behavior

In recent years, several organizations have implemented nonmandatory information and communication systems that escape the conventional behavioral logic of understanding acceptance and usage from a normative perspective of compliance with the beliefs of others. Because voluntary systems require users' volitional behavior, researchers have traced recent implementation failures to a lack of user commitment. However, gaps in our understanding of volitional usage behavior and user commitment have made it difficult to advance theory, research, and practice on this issue. To validate a proposed research model, cross-sectional, between-subjects, and within-subjects field data were collected from 714 users at the time of initial adoption and after six months of extended use. The model explained between 44.1 percent and 58.5 percent of the variance in adoption and usage behavior based upon direct effects of user commitment. Findings suggest that user commitment plays a critical role in the volitional acceptance and usage of such systems. Affective commitment--that is, internalization and identification based upon personal norms--exhibits a sustained positive influence on usage behavior. In contrast, continuance commitment--that is, compliance based upon social norms--shows a sustained negative influence from initial adoption to extended use. Theory development based upon Kelman's social influence framework offers new empirical insights about system users' commitment and how it affects volitional usage behavior.

[1]  Irma Becerra-Fernandez, Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Organizational Knowledge Management: A Contingency Perspective , 2001 .

[2]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[4]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. , 1986 .

[5]  J. R. French,et al.  The bases of social power. , 1959 .

[6]  Arnon E. Reichers,et al.  Conflict and organizational commitments. , 1986 .

[7]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[8]  Bruce Buchanan.  BUILDING ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT: THE SOCIALIZATION OF MANAGERS IN WORK ORGANIZATIONS , 1974 .

[9]  Allison W. Harrison,et al.  Validity Assessment of Compliance, Identification, and Internalization as Dimensions of Organizational Commitment , 1993 .

[10]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Role of commitment and motivation in knowledge management systems implementation: theory, conceptualization, and measurement of antecedents of success , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[11]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Building systems that users want to use , 2004, CACM.

[12]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization: An Examination of Construct Validity , 1996, Journal of vocational behavior.

[13]  Henri Barki,et al.  Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use , 1994 .

[14]  M. Crossan.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[15]  J. Pfeffer.  Organizations and Organization Theory , 1982 .

[16]  I. Ajzen.  Nature and operation of attitudes. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[17]  C. Steinfield,et al.  A Social Information Processing Model of Media Use in Organizations , 1987 .

[18]  R. Acevedo,et al.  Research report , 1967, Revista odontologica de Puerto Rico.

[19]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. , 1978, Administrative science quarterly.

[20]  N. Melone.  A theoretical assessment of the user-satisfaction construct in information systems research , 1990 .

[21]  H. Kelman.  PROCESSES OF OPINION CHANGE , 1961 .

[22]  Venkateshviswanath,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000 .

[23]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  M. Deutsch,et al.  A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[25]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[26]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[27]  P. R. Warshaw.  A New Model for Predicting Behavioral Intentions: An Alternative to Fishbein , 1980 .

[28]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[29]  R. Hess.  Power in organizations. , 2003, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

[30]  Vladimir Zwass,et al.  Actualizing Organizational Memory with Information Systems , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[31]  C. Argyris.  Empowerment: the emperor's new clothes. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[32]  L. Kirsch.  The Management of Complex Tasks in Organizations: Controlling the Systems Development Process , 1996 .

[33]  William Snyder,et al.  Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge , 2002 .

[34]  Fred D. Davis.  A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems : theory and results , 1985 .

[35]  Paul J. Kobulnicky,et al.  Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research and application , 1998 .

[36]  R. Rice,et al.  Attitudes toward New Organizational Technology: Network Proximity as a Mechanism for Social Information Processing. , 1991 .

[37]  H. Kelman.  Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change , 1958 .

[38]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Sources of Influence on Beliefs about Information Technolgoy Use: An Empirical Study of Knowledge Workers , 2003, MIS Q..

[39]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[40]  Yoav Vardi,et al.  Relationships between job, organization, and career commitments and work outcomes—An integrative approach , 1980 .

[41]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[42]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Social influences on ethical behavior in organizations , 2002 .

[43]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[44]  Robert P. Vecchio,et al.  A Social Influence Interpretation of Worker Motivation , 1982 .

[45]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Testing the "Side-Bet Theory" of Organizational Commitment: Some Methodological Considerations , 1984 .

[46]  Ellen M. Hufnagel,et al.  User Response Data: The Potential for Errors and Biases , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[47]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and Discriminant Validity by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix,” Psychological Bulletin (2), March, pp. . , 1959 .

[48]  Michael J. Earl,et al.  Knowledge Management Strategies: Toward a Taxonomy , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Portfolios of Control in Outsourced Software Development Projects , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[50]  C. Hellman,et al.  Newcomer socialization and affective commitment , 1994 .

[51]  Susan K. Charles.  Knowledge management lessons from the document trenches , 2002 .

[52]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  If we build it, they will come: Designing information systems that people want to use , 1994 .

[53]  Varun Grover,et al.  General Perspectives on Knowledge Management: Fostering a Research Agenda , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[54]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization , 1991, MIS Q..

[55]  R. Vandenberg,et al.  A Critical Examination of the Internalization, Identification, and Compliance Commitment Measures , 1994 .

[56]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  PEOPLE AND ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE: A PROFILE COMPARISON APPROACH TO ASSESSING PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT , 1991 .

[57]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[58]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations , 1976 .

[59]  MalhotraYogesh,et al.  A Multidimensional Commitment Model of Volitional Systems Adoption and Usage Behavior , 2003 .

[60]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research, and Application , 1997 .

[61]  Herbert C. Kelman.  Ethical limits on the use of influence in hierarchical relationships , 2001 .

[62]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Studying Knowledge Management in Information Systems Resarch: Discourses and Theoretical Assumptions , 2002, MIS Q..

[63]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[64]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  Managing Codified Knowledge , 1999 .

[65]  M. E. Sheldon,et al.  Investments and Involvements as Mechanisms Producing Commitment to the Organization , 1971 .

[66]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Organizational Knowledge Management: A Contingency Perspective , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[67]  P. Chisnall.  Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[68]  Carl D. Riegel,et al.  The Multidimensional View of Commitment and the Theory of Reasoned Action: A Comparative Evaluation , 1995 .

[69]  John H. Grant,et al.  Construct Measurement in Organizational Strategy Research: A Critique and Proposal , 1986 .

[70]  R. Dubin,et al.  Unit Performance, Situational Factors and Employee Attitudes in Spatially Separated Work Units. , 1974 .

[71]  William R. Darden,et al.  Causal Models in Marketing , 1980 .

[72]  Yoshihisa Kashima,et al.  INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN THE PREDICTIONS OF BEHAVIORAL INTENTIONS , 1988 .

[73]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[74]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[75]  Thomas E. Becker.  Foci and Bases of Commitment: Are They Distinctions Worth Making? , 1992 .

[76]  L. Porter,et al.  The Measurement of Organizational Commitment. , 1979 .

[77]  Arnon E. Reichers,et al.  A review and reconceptualization of organizational commitment. , 1985, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.