A rating scale for wildness and ease of handling laboratory mice: results for 21 inbred strains tested in two laboratories

Rating scales for difficulty in capturing and holding mice were devised that proved to be easy to use and highly sensitive to differences among mouse strains on the A and B priority lists of the Mouse Phenome Project. The simplicity of the scales makes it feasible to rate wildness during behavioral test sessions without adding much to testing time or distracting the technician from the principal task at hand. Overall wildness and placidity ratings obtained by combining capture and hold ratings provide a good impression of the difficulties encountered while working with lab mice in the course of complex experiments. Ratings of 21 inbred strains during the course of 15 behavioral tests in two laboratories demonstrated that the SPRET/Ei, PERA/Ei, CAST/Ei and SWR/J strains were particularly difficult to handle. The NOD/LtJ strain posed no special challenge in the Edmonton laboratory but was very difficult to handle in the Portland lab. The rating scales should be useful for judging the difficulties in working with novel targeted or induced mutations in mice as well as effects of a variety of environmental treatments or drugs.

[1]  J. Crabbe,et al.  Influence of task parameters on rotarod performance and sensitivity to ethanol in mice , 2003, Behavioural Brain Research.

[2]  C. Keeler THE ASSOCIATION OF THE BLACK (non-agouti) GENE WITH BEHAVIOR In the Norway Rat , 1942 .

[3]  Roy H. Smith,et al.  The inheritance of behavioral wildness in house mice (Mus musculus L.) , 1974 .

[4]  Studies in the Dynamics of Behavior , 1933 .

[5]  C. P. Richter,et al.  The effects of domestication and selection on the behavior of the Norway rat. , 1954, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[6]  Vincent Duquenne,et al.  Neuronal and behavioral differences between Mus musculus domesticus (C57BL/6JBy) and Mus musculus castaneus (CAST/Ei) , 1998, Behavioural Brain Research.

[7]  Tsuyoshi Koide,et al.  Multi-phenotype behavioral characterization of inbred strains derived from wild stocks of Mus musculus , 2000, Mammalian Genome.

[8]  D. Wahlsten Contributions of the genes albinism (c) and retinal degeneration (rd) to a strain-by-training procedure interaction in avoidance learning , 1973, Behavior genetics.

[9]  Douglas Wahlsten,et al.  Different data from different labs: lessons from studies of gene-environment interaction. , 2003, Journal of neurobiology.

[10]  Janan T. Eppig,et al.  A mouse phenome project , 2000, Mammalian Genome.

[11]  C. W. Hughes,et al.  Domestication, sophistication, and avoidance in Norway rats. , 1973, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[12]  D. Broom,et al.  An investigation into the effects of solid or grid cage flooring on the welfare of laboratory rats , 1995, Laboratory animals.

[13]  B. Galef Aggression and timidity: responses to novelty in feral Norway rats. , 1970, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[14]  Heredity of Wildness and Savageness in Mice , 2009 .

[15]  R. Yerkes The heredity of savageness and wildness in rats. , 1913 .

[16]  R. Woodworth Dynamics of behavior , 1958 .

[17]  Wim E Crusio,et al.  Hippocampal Morphology and Open-Field Behavior in Mus musculus domesticus and Mus spretus Inbred Mice , 1997, Behavior genetics.