Growth and yield responses of almond (Prunus amygdalus) to trickle irrigation

Growth and yield responses of developing almond trees (Prunus amygdalus, Ruby cultivar) to a range of trickle irrigation amounts were determined in 1985 through 1987 (the fifth through seventh year after planting) at the University of California's West Side Field Station in the semi-arid San Joaquin Valley. The treatments consisted of six levels of irrigation, ranging from 50 through 175% of the estimated crop evapotranspiration (ETc), applied to a clean-cultivated orchard using a line source trickle irrigation system with 6 emitters per tree. ETc was estimated as grass reference evapotranspiration (ET0) times a crop coefficient with adjustments based upon shaded area of trees and period during the growing season. Differential irrigation experiments prior to 1984 on the trees used in this study significantly influenced the initial trunk cross-section area and canopy size in the 50% ETc treatment and 125% ETc treatment. In these cases, treatment effects must be identified as relative effects rather than absolute. The soil of the experimental field was a Panoche clay loam (nonacid, thermic, Typic Torriorthents). The mean increase in trunk cross-sectional area for the 3-year period was a positive linear function (r2 = 0.98) of total amounts of applied water. With increases in water application above the 50% ETc treatment, nut retention with respect to flower and fertile nut counts after flowering, was increased approximately 10%. In 1985 and 1987, the nut meat yields and mean kernel weights increased significantly with increasing water application from 50% to 150% ETc. Particularly in the higher water application treatments, crop consumptive use was difficult to quantify due to uncertainty in estimates of deep percolation and soil water uptake. Maintenance of leaf water potentials higher than −2.3 MPa during early nut development (March through May) and greater than −2.5 MPa the remainder of the irrigation season (through August) were positively correlated with sustained higher vegetative growth rates and higher nut yields.

[1]  K. Uriu,et al.  Radial trunk growth of almonds as affected by soil water and crop density. , 1970 .

[2]  R. Johnson,et al.  Yield and foliar injury responses of mature plum trees to salinity , 1989, Irrigation science.

[3]  E. V. Maas,et al.  Salt Tolerance of Plants , 2019, CRC Handbook of Plant Science in Agriculture Volume II.

[4]  D. R. Nielsen,et al.  Spatial variability of field-measured soil-water properties , 1973 .

[5]  W. L. Powers,et al.  SALT TOLERANCE OF PLANTS AT VARIOUS TEMPERATURES. , 1938, Plant physiology.

[6]  J. Doorenbos,et al.  Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements , 1977 .

[7]  A. Abdel-Rahman,et al.  Response of olive and almond orchards to partial irrigation under dry-farming practices in semi-arid regions: , 2004, Plant and Soil.

[8]  J. W. Biggar,et al.  Temporal persistence of spatial soil-water patterns under trickle irrigation , 1991, Irrigation Science.

[9]  W. Jury,et al.  Water Movement in Bare and Cropped Soil Under Isolated Trickle Emitters: II. Analysis of Cropped Soil Experiments 1 , 1977 .

[10]  R. Miller,et al.  Cotton and Corn Root Development in Two Field Soils of Different Strength Characteristics1 , 1975 .

[11]  Elias Fereres,et al.  Responses of Young Almond Trees to Two Drought Periods in the Field , 1982 .

[12]  J. Biggar,et al.  Trickle irrigation rates and soil salinity distribution in an almond (Prunus amygdalus) orchard , 1991 .

[13]  D. R. Nielsen,et al.  Water movement through Panoche clay loam soil , 1964 .

[14]  A. Torrecillas,et al.  Stomatal response to leaf water potential in almond trees under drip irrigated and non irrigated conditions , 1988, Plant and Soil.