Radiological tumor size decrease at week 6 is a potent predictor of outcome in chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab (BOND trial).

BACKGROUND Early radiological tumor shrinkage may be associated with better long-term outcome in chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (cmCRC) treated with cetuximab. We aimed at validating this in a large and independent series. PATIENTS AND METHODS Of the 329 patients, 289 had a measurement both at baseline and week 6. Tumor shrinkage was expressed as a relative decrease compared with baseline and categorized according to a previously reported cut-off value ( approximately 10%) or used as a continuous variable. RESULTS Median time to progression (TTP) was 6.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.1-7.2] versus 1.5 months (95% CI 1.4-1.7) in patients with [99 patients (34.3%)] or without [190 patients (65.7%)] tumor shrinkage, respectively, at week 6 [hazard ratio (HR) 0.23 (95% CI 0.17-0.32)]. The median overall survival (OS) was 13.7 (CI NA) versus 6.9 months (95% CI 6.1-7.7) [HR 0.21 (95% CI 0.14-0.32)], respectively. In a multivariate model, early tumor decrease outperformed skin toxicity as a predictor of long-term outcome. CONCLUSIONS Tumor shrinkage at 6 weeks is a strong predictor of TTP and OS in cmCRC patients treated with cetuximab with or without irinotecan. This suggests early tumor shrinkage is the hallmark of efficacy of cetuximab and reliably identifies the subpopulation that is sensitive to the drug. Early tumor shrinkage can be used as a marker of efficacy in clinical practice, as such or in combination.

[1]  B. Freidlin,et al.  Blinded independent central review of progression-free survival in phase III clinical trials: important design element or unnecessary expense? , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  M. Buyse,et al.  Endpoints and surrogate endpoints in colorectal cancer: a review of recent developments , 2008, Current opinion in oncology.

[3]  Sabine Tejpar,et al.  KRAS status and efficacy in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with FOLFIRI with or without cetuximab: The CRYSTAL experience , 2008 .

[4]  A. Bardelli,et al.  Role of KRAS mutation in predicting response, progression-free survival, and overall survival in irinotecan-refractory patients treated with cetuximab plus irinotecan for a metastatic colorectal cancer: Analysis of 281 individual data from published series , 2008 .

[5]  Daniel J. Freeman,et al.  Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  KRAS wild-type state predicts survival and is associated to early radiological response in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. , 2008, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[7]  A. Lièvre,et al.  KRAS mutations as an independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  Daniel J Sargent,et al.  Response-independent survival benefit in metastatic colorectal cancer: a comparative analysis of N9741 and AVF2107. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  Michael L Maitland,et al.  Design of phase II cancer trials using a continuous endpoint of change in tumor size: application to a study of sorafenib and erlotinib in non small-cell lung cancer. , 2007, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  Early average change in tumor size in a phase 2 trial: efficient endpoint or false promise? , 2007, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[11]  Edward S. Kim,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor-associated cutaneous toxicities: an evolving paradigm in clinical management. , 2007, The oncologist.

[12]  Manuel Hidalgo,et al.  Expression of epiregulin and amphiregulin and K-ras mutation status predict disease control in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  Ricky T. Tong,et al.  Surrogate markers for antiangiogenic therapy and dose-limiting toxicities for bevacizumab with radiation and chemotherapy: continued experience of a phase I trial in rectal cancer patients. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  Benjamin M Yeh,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a pharmacodynamic measure of response after acute dosing of AG-013736, an oral angiogenesis inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors: results from a phase I study. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  S. Groshen,et al.  Molecular determinants of cetuximab efficacy. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  Armando Santoro,et al.  Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.