Strategic funding priorities in the pharmaceutical sciences allied to Quality by Design (QbD) and Process Analytical Technology (PAT).

Substantial changes in Pharmaceutical R&D strategy are required to address existing issues of low productivity, imminent patent expirations and pressures on pricing. Moves towards personalized healthcare and increasing diversity in the nature of portfolios including the rise of biopharmaceuticals however have the potential to provide considerable challenges to the establishment of cost effective and robust supply chains. To guarantee product quality and surety of supply for essential medicines it is necessary that manufacturing science keeps pace with advances in pharmaceutical R&D. In this position paper, the EUFEPS QbD and PAT Sciences network make recommendations that European industry, academia and health agencies focus attention on delivering step changes in science and technology in a number of key themes. These subject areas, all underpinned by the sciences allied to QbD and PAT, include product design and development for personalized healthcare, continuous-processing in pharmaceutical product manufacture, quantitative quality risk assessment for pharmaceutical development including life cycle management and the downstream processing of biopharmaceutical products. Plans are being established to gain commitment for inclusion of these themes into future funding priorities for the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI).

[1]  Markku Känsäkoski,et al.  Process analytical technology (PAT) needs and applications in the bioprocess industry , 2006 .

[2]  Carl-Fredrik Mandenius,et al.  Process analytical technology (PAT) for biopharmaceuticals , 2011, Biotechnology journal.

[3]  Michael J. Hounslow,et al.  Twin screw wet granulation: Effects of properties of granulation liquid , 2012 .

[4]  K. Plumb,et al.  Continuous Processing in the Pharmaceutical Industry: Changing the Mind Set , 2005 .

[5]  R. Bernards,et al.  Enabling personalized cancer medicine through analysis of gene-expression patterns , 2008, Nature.

[6]  Daniel E. Otzen,et al.  Protein drug stability: a formulation challenge , 2005, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[7]  Mark Kessel,et al.  The problems with today's pharmaceutical business—an outsider's view , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[8]  Marko Närhi,et al.  Manufacturing, regulatory and commercial challenges of biopharmaceuticals production: a Finnish perspective. , 2005, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[9]  J. Breitkreutz,et al.  Novel delivery device for monolithical solid oral dosage forms for personalized medicine. , 2010, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[10]  Michael J. Hounslow,et al.  Twin screw granulation using conveying screws: Effects of viscosity of granulation liquids and flow of powders , 2013 .

[11]  Steve White,et al.  Pharma 2020 : the vision - which path will you take? : pharmaceutical practitioner , 2007 .

[12]  John Doyle,et al.  A review of quantitative risk-benefit methodologies for assessing drug safety and efficacy-report of the ISPOR risk-benefit management working group. , 2010, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[13]  A S Rathore,et al.  Process analytical technology (PAT) for biopharmaceutical products: Part I. concepts and applications , 2010, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[14]  Matthias Holweg,et al.  The genealogy of lean production , 2007 .

[15]  Marianthi G. Ierapetritou,et al.  Periodic section modeling of convective continuous powder mixing processes , 2012 .

[16]  Dimitrios I. Gerogiorgis,et al.  Economic Analysis of Integrated Continuous and Batch Pharmaceutical Manufacturing: A Case Study , 2011 .