A comparative analysis of methods to represent uncertainty in estimating the cost of constructing wastewater treatment plants.

Prediction of construction cost of wastewater treatment facilities could be influential for the economic feasibility of various levels of water pollution control programs. However, construction cost estimation is difficult to precisely evaluate in an uncertain environment and measured quantities are always burdened with different types of cost structures. Therefore, an understanding of the previous development of wastewater treatment plants and of the related construction cost structures of those facilities becomes essential for dealing with an effective regional water pollution control program. But deviations between the observed values and the estimated values are supposed to be due to measurement errors only in the conventional regression models. The inherent uncertainties of the underlying cost structure, where the human estimation is influential, are rarely explored. This paper is designed to recast a well-known problem of construction cost estimation for both domestic and industrial wastewater treatment plants via a comparative framework. Comparisons were made for three technologies of regression analyses, including the conventional least squares regression method, the fuzzy linear regression method, and the newly derived fuzzy goal regression method. The case study, incorporating a complete database with 48 domestic wastewater treatment plants and 29 industrial wastewater treatment plants being collected in Taiwan, implements such a cost estimation procedure in an uncertain environment. Given that the fuzzy structure in regression estimation may account for the inherent human complexity in cost estimation, the fuzzy goal regression method does exhibit more robust results in terms of some criteria. Moderate economy of scale exists in constructing both the domestic and industrial wastewater treatment plants. Findings indicate that the optimal size of a domestic wastewater treatment plant is approximately equivalent to 15,000 m3/day (CMD) and higher in Taiwan. Yet the optimal size of an industrial wastewater treatment plant could fall in between 6000 CMD and 20,000 CMD.

[1]  Phil Diamond,et al.  Fuzzy least squares , 1988, Inf. Sci..

[2]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[3]  Richard Bellman,et al.  Decision-making in fuzzy environment , 2012 .

[4]  K. Jajuga Linear fuzzy regression , 1986 .

[5]  S. F. Wang,et al.  Optimal planning of coastal wastewater treatment and disposal systems , 1995 .

[6]  L. Fan,et al.  Fuzzy linear regression analysis of cellulose hydrolysis , 1986 .

[7]  A. Bárdossy,et al.  Fuzzy regression in hydrology , 1990 .

[8]  Junzo Watada,et al.  Possibilistic linear regression analysis for fuzzy data , 1989 .

[9]  Chen Shi-quan Analysis for multiple fuzzy regression , 1988 .

[10]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Mathematical programing for regional water quality management , 1972 .

[11]  Herbert Moskowitz,et al.  On assessing the H value in fuzzy linear regression , 1993 .

[12]  E. Hannan ON FUZZY GOAL PROGRAMMING , 1981 .

[13]  A. Kandel,et al.  Fuzzy linear regression and its applications to forecasting in uncertain environment , 1985 .

[14]  C. H. Juang,et al.  DETERMINATION OF FUZZY RELATIONSHIP BY FUZZY REGRESSION , 1992 .

[15]  H. Zimmermann Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions , 1978 .

[16]  J. Watada,et al.  Possibilistic linear systems and their application to the linear regression model , 1988 .

[17]  H. Tanka Fuzzy data analysis by possibilistic linear models , 1987 .

[18]  Lu Feng,et al.  A forecasting model of fuzzy self-regression , 1993 .

[19]  Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann,et al.  Applications of fuzzy set theory to mathematical programming , 1985, Inf. Sci..

[20]  K. Asai,et al.  Fuzzy linear programming problems with fuzzy numbers , 1984 .

[21]  R. Narasimhan GOAL PROGRAMMING IN A FUZZY ENVIRONMENT , 1980 .

[22]  B. K. Mohanty,et al.  A preference structure on aspiration levels in a goal programming problem—a fuzzy approach , 1988 .

[23]  H. Tanaka,et al.  Fuzzy solution in fuzzy linear programming problems , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[24]  N. Chang,et al.  Water pollution control in river basin by interactive fuzzy interval multiobjective programming , 1997 .

[25]  Ni-Bin Chang,et al.  A fuzzy goal regression model for the construction cost estimation of municipal waste incinerators , 1996, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[26]  Ni-Bin Chang,et al.  The development of material recovery facilities in the United States: status and cost structure analysis , 1995 .

[27]  Sang-Keon Oh,et al.  An approach to causal modeling in fuzzy environment and its application , 1990 .

[28]  Harvey J. Greenberg,et al.  Mathematical Programming Models for Environmental Quality Control , 1995, Oper. Res..

[29]  A. Bárdossy Note on fuzzy regression , 1990 .

[30]  Wang Xi-zhao,et al.  Fuzzy linear regression analysis , 1992 .

[31]  Chih-Sheng Lee,et al.  Development of a cost function for wastewater treatment systems with fuzzy regression , 1999, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[32]  H. Tanaka,et al.  The fuzzy GMDH algorithm by possibility models and its application , 1990 .

[33]  Masatoshi Sakawa,et al.  Multiobjective fuzzy linear regression analysis for fuzzy input-output data , 1992 .

[34]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  Evaluation of fuzzy linear regression models , 1991 .