An initial experience with lighted ureteral catheters during laparoscopic colectomy.

Ureteral catheters are recommended when a difficult pelvic dissection is anticipated to minimize the risk of ureteral injuries. With the introduction of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy, it has become necessary to replace tactile with visual feedback. Lighted ureteral catheters (LUC) have been advocated for major laparoscopic pelvic surgery as a means of enhancing ureteral identification. However, the use of LUC has been anecdotal to this point. We present the first series of selectively used LUC during laparoscopic-assisted colectomy. Forty-nine consecutive laparoscopic-assisted colectomies were reviewed in which patients had LUC placed or not (NC) [LUC,24(49%); NC, 25(51%)]. Indications for catheter insertion included complicated diverticular disease, previous pelvic surgery, and obesity. The need for LUC was at the discretion of the surgeon. Data collected included catheter visualization, type of procedure, operative time, operating room cost, and catheter or ureteral complications. Catheters were visualized in 5 of 6 (83%) right colectomies and 15 of 18 (83%) left colectomies. Nonvisualization was because of migration to the bladder (2 cases) and dense inflammatory reaction (2 cases). No catheter complications or ureteral injuries occurred in either group. Operative time (LUC, 192 +/- 11.3 min, NC, 161.4 +/- 9.5 min) was significantly longer in the LUC group as a result of the time for catheter insertion and the greater complexity of the case. The operating room cost was similar in the two groups (LUC, $3488.63 +/- 259.01; NC, $3537.56 +/- 313.43). The results indicate that selected use of LUC does significantly increase operating time without significantly increasing operating room cost or operative morbidity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[1]  S. Woolson,et al.  Urinary tract complications of anorectal surgery. , 1972, American journal of surgery.

[2]  T. Eisenstat,et al.  Use of ureteral catheters in colonic and rectal surgery , 1982, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[3]  O. Kronborg,et al.  Urologic complications after operations for anorectal cancer, with an evaluation of preoperative intravenous pyelography , 1975, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[4]  L. Bergdahl,et al.  Urologic complications following abdominoperineal resection of the rectum. , 1976, Archives of surgery.

[5]  M. Bubrick,et al.  Ureteral injuries in colonic surgery. , 1981, Urology.

[6]  F. Nezhat,et al.  Ureteral injuries at laparoscopy: insights into diagnosis, management, and prevention. , 1990, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  A. Polglase,et al.  Ureteric damage in surgery for cancer of the large bowel , 1984, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[8]  B. Ebbesson,et al.  Conservative management of electrical burn injury of ureter secondary to laparoscopy. , 1986, Urology.

[9]  J. Goligher,et al.  Injury to the ureter during laparoscopic tubal sterilization. , 1975, Archives of surgery.

[10]  J. Steckel,et al.  Uretero-fallopian tube fistula secondary to laparoscopic fulguration of pelvic endometriosis. , 1993, The Journal of urology.

[11]  H. R. Nay,et al.  Immediate and delayed urologic complications associated with abdominoperineal resection. , 1972, American journal of surgery.

[12]  R. Roth,et al.  Management of operative ureteral injury. , 1978, Urology.

[13]  P. gordon,et al.  The prophylactic use of ureteral catheters during colorectal operations. , 1994, The American surgeon.

[14]  D. Fry,et al.  Iatrogenic Ureteral Injury: Options in Management , 1983 .

[15]  M. Woodland.  Ureter injury during laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with the endoscopic linear stapler , 1992 .