Ecophysiological and morphological responses to shade and drought in two contrasting ecotypes of Prunus serotina.

Photosynthesis (A), water relations and stomatal reactivity during drought, and leaf morphology were evaluated on 2-year-old, sun- and shade-grown Prunus serotina Ehrh. seedlings of a mesic Pennsylvania seed source and a more xeric Wisconsin source. Wisconsin plants maintained higher A and leaf conductance (g(wv)) than Pennsylvania plants during the entire drought under sun conditions, and during the mid stages of drought under shade conditions. Compared to shade plants, sun plants of both sources exhibited a more rapid decrease in A or % A(max) with decreasing leaf water potential (Psi). Tissue water relations parameters were generally not significantly different between seed sources. However, osmotic potentials were lower in sun than shade plants under well-watered conditions. Following drought, shade plants, but not sun plants, exhibited significant osmotic adjustment. Sun leaves had greater thickness, specific mass, area and stomatal density and lower guard cell length than shade leaves in one or both sources. Wisconsin sun leaves were seemingly more xerophytic with greater thickness, specific mass, and guard cell length than Pennsylvania sun leaves. No source differences in leaf structure were exhibited in shade plants. Stomatal reactivity to sun-shade cycles was similar between ecotypes. However, well-watered and droughted plants differed in stomatal reactivity within and between multiple sun-shade cycles. The observed ecotypic and phenotypic variations in ecophysiology and morphology are consistent with the ability of Prunus serotina to survive in greatly contrasting environments.

[1]  P. Reich,et al.  Water relations and gas exchange of Acer saccharum seedlings in contrasting natural light and water regimes. , 1992, Tree physiology.

[2]  N. Vance,et al.  Influence of drought stress and low irradiance on plant water relations and structural constituents in needles of Pinus ponderosa seedlings. , 1991, Tree physiology.

[3]  G. Nowacki,et al.  Community and edaphic analysis of mixed oak forests in the ridge and valley province of central Pennsylvania , 1991 .

[4]  M. Abrams,et al.  Pressure-volume relationships in non-rehydrated tissue at various water deficits. , 1990 .

[5]  P. Reich,et al.  Fire affects ecophysiology and community dynamics of central Wisconsin oak forest regeneration , 1990 .

[6]  T. W. Bowersox,et al.  Growth response of northern red-oak and yellow- poplar seedlings to light, soil moisture and nutrients in relation to ecological strategy , 1990 .

[7]  M. Abrams,et al.  SUCCESSIONAL REPLACEMENT OF OLD-GROWTH WHITE OAK BY MIXED MESOPHYTIC HARDWOODS IN SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA , 1990 .

[8]  H. Margolis,et al.  Changes in the water relations of balsam fir and white birch saplings after thinning. , 1990, Tree physiology.

[9]  M. Abrams Adaptations and responses to drought in Quercus species of North America. , 1990, Tree physiology.

[10]  M. Abrams,et al.  Drought adaptations and responses in five genotypes of Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marsh.: photosynthesis, water relations and leaf morphology. , 1990, Tree physiology.

[11]  R. Augé,et al.  Osmotic and Turgor Adjustment in Rosa Foliage Drought-stressed under Varying Irradiance , 1990 .

[12]  J. Gamon,et al.  Photoinhibition in Vitis californica: interactive effects of sunlight, temperature and water status , 1990 .

[13]  M. Abrams,et al.  Leaf structural characteristics of 31 hardwood and conifer tree species in central Wisconsin: influence of light regime and shade-tolerance rank. , 1990 .

[14]  Robert W. Pearcy,et al.  SUNFLECKS AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS IN PLANT CANOPIES , 1990 .

[15]  M. Abrams,et al.  Photosynthesis and water relations during drought in Acer rubrum L. genotypes from contrasting sites in central Pennsylvania , 1990 .

[16]  A. Knapp,et al.  Influence of Growth from on Ecophysiological Responses to Variable Sunlight in Subalpine Plants , 1989 .

[17]  M. Abrams Genetic Variation in Leaf Morphology and Plant and Tissue Water Relations During Drought in Cercis canadensis L , 1988 .

[18]  M. Abrams Sources of variation in osmotic potentials with special reference to North American tree species , 1988 .

[19]  C. W. Ramm,et al.  Landform-mediated differences in successional pathways among upland forest ecosystems in northwestern Lower Michigan. , 1987 .

[20]  H. Mooney,et al.  Plant Physiological Ecology TodayRecent advances are helping to determine the biochemistry and physiology behind plant performance under natural conditions , 1987 .

[21]  M. D. Abram Physiological plasticity in water relations and leaf structure of understory versus open-grown Cerciscanadensis in northeastern Kansas , 1986 .

[22]  R. Teskey,et al.  Water relations of loblolly pine seedlings from diverse geographic origins. , 1986, Tree physiology.

[23]  Carl D. Schlichting,et al.  The Evolution of Phenotypic Plasticity in Plants , 1986 .

[24]  G. Cottam,et al.  The Successional Status of a Southern Wisconsin Oak Woods , 1985 .

[25]  S. Pallardy,et al.  Genotypic variation in tissue water relations of leaves and roots of black walnut (Juglans nigra) seedlings , 1985 .

[26]  Park S. Nobel,et al.  Biophysical plant physiology and ecology , 1983 .

[27]  J. Berry,et al.  Photosynthetic Response and Adaptation to Temperature in Higher Plants , 1980 .

[28]  N. Boardman Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants. , 1977 .

[29]  J. Fryer,et al.  Microevolution of the photosynthetic temperature optimum in relation to the elevational complex gradient , 1972 .

[30]  W. W. Payne HELICOCYTIC AND ALLELOCYTIC STOMATA: UNRECOGNIZED PATTERNS IN THE DI COTYLEDON AE , 1970 .

[31]  L. W. Jackson Effect of Shade on Leaf Structure of Deciduous Tree Species , 1967 .

[32]  H. Mooney,et al.  Comparative Physiological Ecology of Arctic and Alpine Populations of Oxyria digyna , 1961 .