A sequential approach to exploiting the combined strengths of SP and RP data: Application to freight shipper choice

The possibility of and procedure for pooling RP and SP data have been discussed in recent research work. In that literature, the RP data has been viewed as the yardstick against which the SP data must be compared. In this paper we take a fresh look at the two data types. Based on the peculiar strengths and weaknesses of each we propose a new, sequential approach to exploiting the strengths and avoiding the weaknesses of each data source. This approach is based on the premise that SP data, characterized by a well-conditioned design matrix and a less constrained decision environment than the real world, is able to capture respondents' tradeoffs more robustly than is possible in RP data. (This, in turn, results in more robust estimates of share changes due to changes in independent variables.) The RP data, however, represent the current market situation better than the SP data, hence should be used to establish the aggregate equilibrium level represented by the final model. The approachfixes the RP parameters for independent variables at the estimated SP parameters but uses the RP data to establish alternative-specific constants. Simultaneously, the RP data are rescaled to correct for error-in-variables problems in the RP design matrixvis-à- vis the SP design matrix. All specifications tested are Multinomial Logit (MNL) models.The approach is tested with freight shippers' choice of carrier in three major North American cities. It is shown that the proposed sequential approach to using SP and RP data has the same or better predictive power as the model calibrated solely on the RP data (which is the best possible model for that data, in terms of goodness-of-fit figures of merit), when measured in terms of Pearson's Chi-squared ratio and the percent correctly predicted statistic. The sequential approach is also shown to produce predictions with lower error than produced by the more usual method of pooling the RP and SP data.

[1]  D. Hensher,et al.  Behavioural intentions as predictors of very specific behaviour , 1979 .

[2]  J. Louviere,et al.  Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities , 1994 .

[3]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Testing Predicted Choices Against Observations in Probabilistic Discrete-Choice Models , 1993 .

[4]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  THEORY, METHODOLOGY, AND FINDINGS IN MODE CHOICE BEHAVIOR , 1973 .

[5]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  A composite attitude-behavior model of traveler decision making , 1981 .

[6]  M Wardman,et al.  THE DESIGN OF STATED PREFERENCE TRAVEL CHOICE EXPERIMENTS. WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO INTERPERSONAL TASTE VARIATIONS , 1988 .

[7]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Integration of attributes in bus transportation: Two modeling approaches. , 1974 .

[8]  John Bates,et al.  ECONOMETRIC ISSUES IN STATED PREFERENCE ANALYSIS , 1988 .

[9]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF SIMULATED CHOICE OR ALLOCATION EXPERIMENTS IN TRAVEL CHOICE MODELING , 1982 .

[10]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Predicting the evaluation of real stimulus objects from abstract evaluation of their attributes: The case of trout streams. , 1974 .

[11]  Andrew Daly,et al.  USES OF THE LOGIT SCALING APPROACH IN STATED PREFERENCE ANALYSIS. , 1993 .

[12]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice or Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregate Data , 1983 .

[13]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  AN EXPERIMENT TO DERIVE PREDICTIVE MODELS OF PUBLIC RESPONSE TO POLICY MANIPULATIONS IN PUBLIC BUS TRANSPORTATION , 1974 .

[14]  D. Hensher.  The use of discrete choice models in the determination of community choices in public issue areas impacting on business decision making , 1991 .

[15]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Estimation of switching models from revealed preferences and stated intentions , 1990 .

[16]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  LABORATORY-SIMULATION VERSUS REVEALED-PREFERENCE METHODS FOR ESTIMATING TRAVEL DEMAND MODELS , 1981 .

[17]  Dick Ettema,et al.  Estimating availability effects in travel choice modeling : a stated choice approach , 1992 .

[18]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Cross-task validity comparisons of stated preference choice models , 1993 .

[19]  Hjp Harry Timmermans,et al.  Mother logit analysis of substitution effects in consumer shopping destination choice , 1991 .

[20]  D. Dillman.  Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[21]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[22]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Analyzing Decision Making , 1988 .

[23]  Peter O. Barnard,et al.  THE ROLE OF STATED PREFERENCE METHODS IN STUDIES OF TRAVEL CHOICE , 1987 .

[24]  R. Sheldon,et al.  Stated preference methods , 1988 .

[25]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Analysis of the reliability of preference ranking data , 1991 .

[26]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Applied discrete-choice modelling , 1980 .

[27]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Experimental analysis of choice , 1991 .

[28]  J. Louviere,et al.  The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models , 1993 .

[29]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF MODE CHOICE , 1978 .