Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Technology Intervention to Support Postabortion Care in British Columbia: Phase I

Background Over 30% of women in Canada undergo an abortion. Despite the prevalence of the procedure, stigma surrounding abortion in Canada leads to barriers for women to access this service. The vast majority of care is concentrated in urban settings. There is evidence to support utilization of innovative mobile and other technology solutions to empower women to safely and effectively self-manage aspects of the abortion process. This study is part 1 of a 3-phase study that utilizes user-centered design methodology to develop a digital health solution to specifically support follow-up after an induced surgical abortion. Objective This study aimed to (1) understand how women at 3 surgical abortion clinics in an urban center of British Columbia utilize their mobile phones to access health care information and (2) understand women’s preferences of content and design of an intervention that will support follow-up care after an induced abortion, including contraceptive use. Methods The study design was based on development-evaluation-implementation process from Medical Research Council Framework for Complex Medical Interventions. This was a mixed-methods formative study. Women (aged 14-45 years) were recruited from 3 urban abortion facilities in British Columbia who underwent an induced abortion. Adaptation of validated surveys and using the technology acceptance model and theory of reasoned action, a cross-sectional survey was designed. Interview topics included demographic information; type of wireless device used; cell phone usage; acceptable information to include in a mobile intervention to support women’s abortion care; willingness to use a mobile phone to obtain reproductive health information; optimal strategies to use a mobile intervention to support women; understand preferences for health information resources; and design qualities in a mobile intervention important for ease of use, privacy, and security. Responses to questions in the survey were summarized using descriptive statistics. Qualitative analysis was conducted with NVivo using a thematic analysis approach. This study was approved by the local ethics board. Results A waiting-room survey was completed by 50 participants, and semistructured interviews were completed with 8 participants. The average age of participants was 26 years. Furthermore, 94% (47/50) owned a smartphone, 85% (41/48) used their personal phones to go online, and 85% would use their cell phone to assist in clinical care. Qualitative analysis demonstrated that women prefer a comprehensive website that included secure email or text notifications to provide tools and resources for emotional well-being, contraceptive decision making, general sexual health, and postprocedure care. Conclusions A community-based mixed-methods approach allowed us to understand how women use their cell phones and what women desire in a mobile intervention to support their postabortion care. The findings from this formative phase will assist in the development and testing of a mobile intervention to support follow-up care after an induced surgical abortion.

[1]  A. Foster,et al.  “I kind of feel like sometimes I am shoving it under the carpet”: Documenting women’s experiences with post-abortion support in Ontario , 2017 .

[2]  E. Raymond,et al.  Exploring the feasibility of obtaining mifepristone and misoprostol from the internet. , 2017, Contraception.

[3]  D. Grossman,et al.  Safety of Medical Abortion Provided Through Telemedicine Compared With In Person. , 2017, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  Stephen Hailes,et al.  Developing and Evaluating JIApp: Acceptability and Usability of a Smartphone App System to Improve Self-Management in Young People With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis , 2017, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[5]  K. Grumbach,et al.  Development and field testing of a decision support tool to facilitate shared decision making in contraceptive counseling. , 2017, Patient education and counseling.

[6]  J. Trussell,et al.  Experiences and characteristics of women seeking and completing at‐home medical termination of pregnancy through online telemedicine in Ireland and Northern Ireland: a population‐based analysis , 2017, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[7]  J. Trussell,et al.  Self reported outcomes and adverse events after medical abortion through online telemedicine: population based study in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland , 2017, British Medical Journal.

[8]  T. Wong,et al.  Use of GetCheckedOnline, a Comprehensive Web-based Testing Service for Sexually Transmitted and Blood-Borne Infections , 2017, Journal of medical Internet research.

[9]  M. Lim,et al.  Safe Sex Messages Within Dating and Entertainment Smartphone Apps: A Review , 2016, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[10]  A. Foster,et al.  "They made me go through like weeks of appointments and everything": Documenting women's experiences seeking abortion care in Yukon territory, Canada. , 2016, Contraception.

[11]  C. Gerdts,et al.  Quality of Care in a Safe-Abortion Hotline in Indonesia: Beyond Harm Reduction. , 2016, American journal of public health.

[12]  M. Gilbert,et al.  Get Checked… Where? The Development of a Comprehensive, Integrated Internet-Based Testing Program for Sexually Transmitted and Blood-Borne Infections in British Columbia, Canada , 2016, JMIR research protocols.

[13]  Khanjan Mehta,et al.  Leveraging design thinking to build sustainable mobile health systems , 2016, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[14]  A. King,et al.  Iterative development of Vegethon: a theory-based mobile app intervention to increase vegetable consumption , 2016, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[15]  N. Leon,et al.  Self-management of medical abortion: a qualitative evidence synthesis , 2016, Reproductive health matters.

[16]  Judy Gold,et al.  Mobile Technology for Improved Family Planning (MOTIF): the development of a mobile phone-based (mHealth) intervention to support post-abortion family planning (PAFP) in Cambodia , 2015, Reproductive Health.

[17]  A. Foster,et al.  Toll free but not judgment free: evaluating postabortion support services in Ontario. , 2015, Contraception.

[18]  C. Free,et al.  Effect of a mobile phone-based intervention on post-abortion contraception: a randomized controlled trial in Cambodia , 2015, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[19]  C. Gerdts,et al.  Measuring abortion-related mortality: challenges and opportunities , 2015, Reproductive Health.

[20]  S. Dunn,et al.  Barriers and facilitators to family planning access in Canada. , 2015, Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante.

[21]  R. Lester,et al.  A Qualitative Study Investigating the Use of a Mobile Phone Short Message Service Designed to Improve HIV Adherence and Retention in Care in Canada (WelTel BC1)☆ , 2014, The Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care : JANAC.

[22]  C. Dehlendorf,et al.  Pilot study of “My Birth Control,” a contraceptive counseling decision support tool , 2014 .

[23]  P. Lohr,et al.  RU OK? The acceptability and feasibility of remote technologies for follow-up after early medical abortion. , 2014, Contraception.

[24]  R. Lester,et al.  The effect of weekly text-message communication on treatment completion among patients with latent tuberculosis infection: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (WelTel LTBI) , 2014, BMJ Open.

[25]  D. Constant,et al.  Integrating Mobile Phones into Medical Abortion Provision: Intervention Development, Use, and Lessons Learned From a Randomized Controlled Trial , 2014, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[26]  E. Wiebe Use of telemedicine for providing medical abortion , 2014, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[27]  S. Dunn,et al.  Medical abortion in Canada: behind the times , 2014, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[28]  Garrett Mehl,et al.  mHealth innovations as health system strengthening tools: 12 common applications and a visual framework , 2013, Global Health: Science and Practice.

[29]  Thomas Springer,et al.  A conceptual framework for designing mHealth solutions for developing countries , 2013, MobileHealth '13.

[30]  M. Doull,et al.  Spatial disparities and travel to freestanding abortion clinics in Canada , 2013 .

[31]  K. Lane,et al.  Women's and providers' experiences with medical abortion provided through telemedicine: a qualitative study. , 2013, Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health.

[32]  A. Haines,et al.  The Effectiveness of Mobile-Health Technology-Based Health Behaviour Change or Disease Management Interventions for Health Care Consumers: A Systematic Review , 2013, PLoS medicine.

[33]  W. Norman Induced abortion in Canada 1974-2005: trends over the first generation with legal access. , 2012, Contraception.

[34]  Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems , 2012 .

[35]  W. Jack,et al.  Effects of a mobile phone short message service on antiretroviral treatment adherence in Kenya (WelTel Kenya1): a randomised trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[36]  Richard J. Holden,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care , 2010, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[37]  D. Patrick,et al.  The ORTHO BC-SAT – a satisfaction questionnaire for women using hormonal contraceptives , 2006, Quality of Life Research.

[38]  Laura Johnson,et al.  How Many Interviews Are Enough? , 2006 .

[39]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[40]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. , 2013, International journal of nursing studies.

[41]  G. Guest,et al.  How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability , 2005 .