Ground/space, passive/active remote sensing observations coupled with particle dispersion modelling to understand the inter-continental transport of wildfire smoke plumes

Abstract During the 2017 record-breaking burning season in Canada/United States, intense wild fires raged during the first week of September in the Pacific northwestern region (British Columbia, Alberta, Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana and northern California) burning mostly temperate coniferous forests. The heavy loads of smoke particles emitted in the atmosphere reached the Iberian Peninsula (IP) a few days later on 7 and 8 September. Satellite imagery allows to identify two main smoke clouds emitted during two different periods that were injected and transported in the atmosphere at several altitude levels. Columnar properties on 7 and 8 September at two Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) mid-altitude, background sites in northern and southern Spain are: aerosol optical depth (AOD) at 440 nm up to 0.62, Angstrom exponent of 1.6–1.7, large dominance of small particles (fine mode fraction >0.88), low absorption AOD at 440 nm ( 0.98). Profiles from the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) show the presence of smoke particles in the stratosphere during the transport, whereas the smoke is only observed in the troposphere at its arrival over the IP. Portuguese and Spanish ground lidar stations from the European Aerosol Research Lidar Network/Aerosols, Clouds, and Trace gases Research InfraStructure Network (EARLINET/ACTRIS) and the Micro-Pulse Lidar NETwork (MPLNET) reveal smoke plumes with different properties: particle depolarization ratio and color ratio, respectively, of 0.05 and 2.5 in the mid troposphere (5–9 km) and of 0.10 and 3.0 in the upper troposphere (10–13 km). In the mid troposphere the particle depolarization ratio does not seem time-dependent during the transport whereas the color ratio seems to increase (larger particles sediment first). To analyze the horizontal and vertical transport of the smoke from its origin to the IP, particle dispersion modelling is performed with the Hybrid Single Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory Model (HYSPLIT) parameterized with satellite-derived biomass burning emission estimates from the Global Fire Assimilation System (GFAS) of the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS). Three compounds are simulated: carbon monoxide, black carbon and organic carbon. The results show that the first smoke plume which travels slowly reaches rapidly (~1 day) the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS) but also shows evidence of large scale horizontal dispersion, while the second plume, entrained by strong subtropical jets, reaches the upper troposphere much slower (~2.5 days). Observations and dispersion modelling all together suggest that particle depolarization properties are enhanced during their vertical transport from the mid to the upper troposphere.

[1]  Ulla Wandinger,et al.  Target categorization of aerosol and clouds by continuous multiwavelength-polarization lidar measurements , 2017 .

[2]  T. Eck,et al.  Wavelength dependence of the optical depth of biomass burning, urban, and desert dust aerosols , 1999 .

[3]  J. Jimenez,et al.  Absorption Angstrom Exponent in AERONET and related data as an indicator of aerosol composition , 2009 .

[4]  P. North,et al.  Smoke aerosol properties and ageing effects for northern temperate and boreal regions derived from AERONET source and age attribution , 2015 .

[5]  A. Ansmann,et al.  Separation of the optical and mass features of particle components in different aerosol mixtures by using POLIPHON retrievals in synergy with continuous polarized Micro-Pulse Lidar (P-MPL) measurements , 2018, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[6]  Philip Cunningham,et al.  Severe convective storms initiated by intense wildfires: Numerical simulations of pyro‐convection and pyro‐tornadogenesis , 2009 .

[7]  Doina Nicolae,et al.  The unprecedented 2017–2018 stratospheric smoke event: decay phase and aerosol properties observed with the EARLINET , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[8]  A. T. J. de Laat,et al.  A solar escalator: Observational evidence of the self‐lifting of smoke and aerosols by absorption of solar radiation in the February 2009 Australian Black Saturday plume , 2012 .

[9]  A. Stohl,et al.  Raman lidar observations of aged Siberian and Canadian forest fire smoke in the free troposphere over Germany in 2003 : Microphysical particle characterization , 2005 .

[10]  R. Boers,et al.  Lifting potential of solar‐heated aerosol layers , 2010 .

[11]  J. Jimenez,et al.  Evolution of brown carbon in wildfire plumes , 2015 .

[12]  Ulla Wandinger,et al.  Transport of boreal forest fire emissions from Canada , 2001 .

[13]  T. Eck,et al.  Variability of Absorption and Optical Properties of Key Aerosol Types Observed in Worldwide Locations , 2002 .

[14]  P. Mcmurry,et al.  Variability in morphology, hygroscopicity, and optical properties of soot aerosols during atmospheric processing , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Mark A. Vaughan,et al.  The Retrieval of Profiles of Particulate Extinction from Cloud-Aerosol Lidar Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) Data: Algorithm Description , 2009 .

[16]  C. Justice,et al.  Fire and smoke observed from the Earth Observing System MODIS instrument--products, validation, and operational use , 2003 .

[17]  M. Chin,et al.  THE JOINT AEROSOL- MONSOON EXPERIMENT A New Challenge for Monsoon Climate Research , 2008 .

[18]  Tami C. Bond,et al.  Spectral absorption properties of atmospheric aerosols , 2007 .

[19]  Taylor H. Ricketts,et al.  Terrestrial ecoregions of North America : a conservation assessment , 1999 .

[20]  Jay R. Herman,et al.  Pyro-cumulonimbus injection of smoke to the stratosphere: Observations and impact of a super blowup in northwestern Canada , 2005 .

[21]  P. Buseck,et al.  Shapes of soot aerosol particles and implications for their effects on climate , 2010 .

[22]  Victoria E. Cachorro,et al.  Aerosol optical depth and Ångström exponent climatology at El Arenosillo AERONET site (Huelva, Spain) , 2007 .

[23]  M. Razinger,et al.  Biomass burning emissions estimated with a global fire assimilation system based on observed fire radiative power , 2011 .

[24]  B. Weinzierl,et al.  Aerosol classification by airborne high spectral resolution lidar observations , 2012 .

[25]  A. Stohl,et al.  Extreme CO concentrations in the upper troposphere over northeast Asia in June 2003 from the in situ MOZAIC aircraft data , 2005 .

[26]  L. Alados-Arboledas,et al.  Microphysical characterization of long-range transported biomass burning particles from North America at three EARLINET stations , 2016 .

[27]  E. Atlas,et al.  Lagrangian analysis of low altitude anthropogenic plume processing across the North Atlantic , 2008 .

[28]  Gunnar Luderer,et al.  Modeling of biomass smoke injection into the lower stratosphere by a large forest fire (Part II): sensitivity studies , 2006 .

[29]  H. Rohatschek.  Levitation of stratospheric and mesospheric aerosols by gravito-photophoresis , 1996 .

[30]  Joel S. Levine,et al.  Particulate and Trace Gas Emissions from Large Biomass Fires in North America , 1991 .

[31]  Y. Wang,et al.  Characterization of forest fire smoke event near Washington, DC in summer 2013 with multi-wavelength lidar , 2014 .

[32]  Colette Brogniez,et al.  Vertical distribution of the different types of aerosols in the stratosphere: Detection of solid particles and analysis of their spatial variability , 2008 .

[33]  R. C. Owen,et al.  Morphology and mixing state of aged soot particles at a remote marine free troposphere site: Implications for optical properties , 2015 .

[34]  Anthony W. Strawa,et al.  Vertical transport of anthropogenic soot aerosol into the middle atmosphere , 2000 .

[35]  J. Kar,et al.  Enhancements to the caliop aerosol subtyping and lidar ratio selection algorithms for level II version 4 , 2016 .

[36]  Thomas T. Warner,et al.  Ensemble Simulations with Coupled Atmospheric Dynamic and Dispersion Models: Illustrating Uncertainties in Dosage Simulations , 2002 .

[37]  Mike Fromm,et al.  A case study of pyro-convection using transport model and remote sensing data , 2006 .

[38]  A. Stohl,et al.  Injection in the lower stratosphere of biomass fire emissions followed by long-range transport: a MOZAIC case study , 2008 .

[39]  Francesc Rocadenbosch,et al.  Current Research in Lidar Technology Used for the Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Aerosols , 2017, Sensors.

[40]  J. Kar,et al.  Swelling of Transported Smoke from Savanna fires over the Southeast Atlantic Ocean. , 2018, Remote sensing of environment.

[41]  G. Luderer,et al.  The Chisholm firestorm: observed microstructure, precipitation and lightning activity of a pyro-cumulonimbus , 2006 .

[42]  V. Freudenthaler,et al.  EARLINET: towards an advanced sustainable European aerosol lidar network , 2014 .

[43]  R. Ferrare,et al.  Aerosol classification using airborne High Spectral Resolution Lidar measurements – methodology and examples , 2011 .

[44]  L. Polvani,et al.  Ozone hole and Southern Hemisphere climate change , 2009 .

[45]  Matthew S. Johnson,et al.  A multiparameter aerosol classification method and its application to retrievals from spaceborne polarimetry , 2014 .

[46]  Riko Oki,et al.  The EarthCARE Satellite: The Next Step Forward in Global Measurements of Clouds, Aerosols, Precipitation, and Radiation , 2015 .

[47]  M. J. Costa,et al.  The unprecedented 2017–2018 stratospheric smoke event: Decay phase and aerosol properties observed with EARLINET , 2019 .

[48]  Glenn Rolph,et al.  Real-time Environmental Applications and Display sYstem: READY , 2017, Environ. Model. Softw..

[49]  Gunnar Luderer,et al.  Modeling of biomass smoke injection into the lower stratosphere by a large forest fire (Part I): reference simulation , 2006 .

[50]  R. Bellasio,et al.  A statistical methodology for the evaluation of long-range dispersion models: an application to the ETEX exercise , 1998 .

[51]  V. Freudenthaler,et al.  Depolarization ratio profiling at several wavelengths in pure Saharan dust during SAMUM 2006 , 2009 .

[52]  Eric P. Shettle,et al.  Observations of boreal forest fire smoke in the stratosphere by POAM III, SAGE II, and lidar in 1998 , 2000 .

[53]  Michael Cusack,et al.  Variability of Particle Number, Black Carbon, and PM10, PM2.5, and PM1 Levels and Speciation: Influence of Road Traffic Emissions on Urban Air Quality , 2010 .

[54]  Michael Fromm,et al.  Transport of forest fire smoke above the tropopause by supercell convection , 2003 .

[55]  Iwona S. Stachlewska,et al.  Study of aerosol optical properties during long-range transport of biomass burning from Canada to Central Europe in July 2013 , 2016 .

[56]  Roger A. Pielke,et al.  Use of meteorological models as input to regional and mesoscale air quality models — limitations and strengths , 1998 .

[57]  A. Heil,et al.  Assessment the Global Fire Assimilation System (GFASv1) , 2013 .

[58]  R. Draxler,et al.  Description and Verification of the NOAA Smoke Forecasting System: The 2007 Fire Season , 2009 .

[59]  R. Draxler,et al.  NOAA’s HYSPLIT Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion Modeling System , 2015 .

[60]  Teruyuki Nakajima,et al.  Tropospheric aerosol optical thickness from the GOCART model and comparisons with satellite and sun photometer measurements , 2002 .

[61]  Ellsworth J. Welton,et al.  Global monitoring of clouds and aerosols using a network of micropulse lidar systems , 2001, SPIE Asia-Pacific Remote Sensing.

[62]  S. Twomey,et al.  The Production of Cloud Nuclei by Cane Fires and the Effect on Cloud Droplet Concentration , 1967 .

[63]  R. Draxler,et al.  Verification of the NOAA Smoke Forecasting System: Model Sensitivity to the Injection Height , 2009 .

[64]  R. Engelmann,et al.  Extreme levels of Canadian wildfire smoke in the stratosphere over central Europe on 21–22 August 2017 , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[65]  A. Smirnov,et al.  AERONET-a federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol Characterization , 1998 .

[66]  T. Eck,et al.  AERONET-based models of smoke-dominated aerosol near source regions and transported over oceans, and implications for satellite retrievals of aerosol optical depth , 2014 .

[67]  L. Alados-Arboledas,et al.  Aerosol optical, microphysical and radiative properties at regional background insular sites in the western Mediterranean , 2016 .

[68]  Lucas Alados-Arboledas,et al.  Aerosol scattering and absorption Angström exponents as indicators of dust and dust-free days over Granada (Spain) , 2015 .

[69]  P. Riggan,et al.  Particulate and trace gas emissions from large biomass fire in North America , 1991 .

[70]  J. Pelon,et al.  Stratospheric Smoke With Unprecedentedly High Backscatter Observed by Lidars Above Southern France , 2018 .

[71]  Thomas W. Kirchstetter,et al.  Emissions of trace gases and aerosols during the open combustion of biomass in the laboratory , 2009 .

[72]  William L. Smith,et al.  AIRS: Improving Weather Forecasting and Providing New Data on Greenhouse Gases. , 2006 .

[73]  Monika K. Rabarison,et al.  Sensitivity of atmospheric dispersion simulations by HYSPLIT to the meteorological predictions from a meso-scale model , 2008 .

[74]  M. Haeffelin,et al.  Long-range-transported Canadian smoke plumes in the lower stratosphere over northern France , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[75]  M. Kahnert,et al.  Observations of the spectral dependence of linear particle depolarization ratio of aerosols using NASA Langley airborne High Spectral Resolution Lidar , 2015 .

[76]  Anne Grete Straume,et al.  A More Extensive Investigation of the Use of Ensemble Forecasts for Dispersion Model Evaluation , 2001 .

[77]  Narendra Singh,et al.  Global trends of columnar and vertically distributed properties of aerosols with emphasis on dust, polluted dust and smoke - inferences from 10-year long CALIOP observations , 2018 .

[78]  W. Randel,et al.  Definitions and sharpness of the extratropical tropopause: A trace gas perspective , 2004 .

[79]  J. Reid,et al.  Physical and optical properties of young smoke from individual biomass fires in Brazil , 1998 .

[80]  M. Fromm,et al.  A Conceptual Model for Development of Intense Pyrocumulonimbus in Western North America , 2017 .

[81]  P. Crutzen,et al.  Biomass Burning in the Tropics: Impact on Atmospheric Chemistry and Biogeochemical Cycles , 1990, Science.

[82]  M. George,et al.  Satellite- and ground-based CO total column observations over 2010 Russian fires: accuracy of top-down estimates based on thermal IR satellite data , 2019 .

[83]  Anne Garnier,et al.  Extinction and optical depth retrievals for CALIPSO's Version 4 data release , 2018, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[84]  S. Massie,et al.  Stratospheric impact of the Chisholm pyrocumulonimbus eruption: 2. Vertical profile perspective , 2008 .

[85]  J. Goldammer,et al.  Modeling of carbonaceous particles emitted by boreal and temperate wildfires at northern latitudes , 2000 .

[86]  Tianhai Cheng,et al.  Effects of morphology on the radiative properties of internally mixed light absorbing carbon aerosols with different aging status. , 2014, Optics express.

[87]  David M. Winker,et al.  The CALIPSO Version 4 Automated Aerosol Classification and Lidar Ratio Selection Algorithm. , 2018, Atmospheric measurement techniques.

[88]  M. Andreae,et al.  Black carbon or brown carbon? The nature of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols , 2006 .

[89]  D. Roy,et al.  Quantification of MODIS fire radiative power (FRP) measurement uncertainty for use in satellite‐based active fire characterization and biomass burning estimation , 2014 .

[90]  D. Winker,et al.  Initial performance assessment of CALIOP , 2007 .

[91]  A. Robock.  Volcanic eruptions and climate , 2000 .

[92]  M. George,et al.  Satellite- and ground-based CO total column observations over 2010 Russian fires: accuracy of top-down estimates based on thermal IR satellite data , 2011 .

[93]  R. Engelmann,et al.  Depolarization and lidar ratios at 355, 532, and 1064 nm and microphysical properties of aged tropospheric and stratospheric Canadian wildfire smoke , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[94]  S. Petelina,et al.  Transport and evolution of the 2009 Australian Black Saturday bushfire smoke in the lower stratosphere observed by OSIRIS on Odin , 2011 .

[95]  T. Eck,et al.  Modified angström exponent for the characterization of submicrometer aerosols. , 2001, Applied optics.

[96]  T. Eck,et al.  Spectral discrimination of coarse and fine mode optical depth , 2003 .

[97]  R. Engelmann,et al.  An overview of the first decade of Polly NET : an emerging network of automated Raman-polarization lidars for continuous aerosol profiling , 2016 .

[98]  W. Lau,et al.  THE JOINT AEROSOL – MONSOON EXPERIMENT A New Challenge for Monsoon Climate Research , 2022 .

[99]  Francesc Rocadenbosch,et al.  An Architecture Providing Depolarization Ratio Capability for a Multi-Wavelength Raman Lidar: Implementation and First Measurements , 2017, Sensors.

[100]  Albert Ansmann,et al.  European pollution outbreaks during ACE 2: Optical particle properties inferred from multiwavelength lidar and star-Sun photometry , 2002 .

[101]  K. Hirsch,et al.  Large forest fires in Canada, 1959–1997 , 2002 .

[102]  Thomas Trickl,et al.  The Untold Story of Pyrocumulonimbus , 2010 .

[103]  Jay R. Herman,et al.  Correction to “Pyro‐cumulonimbus injection of smoke to the stratosphere: Observations and impact of a super blowup in northwestern Canada on 3–4 August 1998” , 2005 .