Pattern matching for variation-source identification in manufacturing processes in the presence of unstructured noise

Variation-source identification has received considerable attention from the manufacturing quality improvement community. One widely used method is based on a pattern matching procedure, which identifies process faults by comparing the fault symptom, which is the principal eigenvector of the covariance matrix of the quality measurement, with fault signatures. The presence of unstructured noise as well as the uncertainty due to sampling will cause the direction of the fault symptom to deviate from the corresponding fault signature. The influences of these two effects on pattern matching procedures have previously been studied separately, by assuming either the absence of unstructured noise or the availability of large samples. This paper developes a robust pattern matching procedure that considers both effects simultaneously. Using a machining process as an illustrative example, the paper demonstrates that previous pattern matching procedures can have a remarkably low identification capability when the assumptions are not strictly satisfied. By contrast, our proposed method is more robust, maintaining a good identification probability, and would be a preferable tool for root-cause identification in manufacturing quality improvement.

[1]  Darek Ceglarek,et al.  Dimensional Fault Diagnosis for Compliant Beam Structure Assemblies , 1998, Manufacturing Science and Engineering.

[2]  R. Muirhead Aspects of Multivariate Statistical Theory , 1982, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[3]  Jionghua Jin,et al.  State Space Modeling of Sheet Metal Assembly for Dimensional Control , 1999 .

[4]  Yong Chen,et al.  Diagnosability Study of Multistage Manufacturing Processes Based on Linear Mixed-Effects Models , 2003, Technometrics.

[5]  Daniel W. Apley,et al.  A Factor-Analysis Method for Diagnosing Variability in Mulitvariate Manufacturing Processes , 2001, Technometrics.

[6]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[7]  S. R. Searle,et al.  Generalized, Linear, and Mixed Models , 2005 .

[8]  Qiang Huang,et al.  State space modeling of dimensional variation propagation in multistage machining process using differential motion vectors , 2003, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[9]  Yu Ding,et al.  Fault Diagnosis of Multistage Manufacturing Processes by Using State Space Approach , 2002 .

[10]  Minho Chang,et al.  Computational method for diagnosis of variation-related assembly problems , 1998 .

[11]  Yu Ding,et al.  A comparison of process variation estimators for in-process dimensional measurements and control , 2005 .

[12]  Daniel W. Apley,et al.  Diagnosis of Multiple Fixture Faults in Panel Assembly , 1996, Manufacturing Science and Engineering.

[13]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Variance Components , 2003 .

[14]  Darek Ceglarek,et al.  Fixture Failure Diagnosis for Autobody Assembly Using Pattern Recognition , 1996 .

[15]  Yu Ding,et al.  Diagnosability Analysis of Multi-Station Manufacturing Processes , 2002 .

[16]  Charles E. Heckler,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 2005, Technometrics.

[17]  Fred Spiring,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Quality Control , 2007, Technometrics.

[18]  Hamdy A. Taha,et al.  Operations research: an introduction / Hamdy A. Taha , 1982 .

[19]  Antony R. Unwin,et al.  Operations Research — An Introduction (2nd edn) , 1980 .

[20]  Yong Chen,et al.  Statistical estimation and testing for variation root-cause identification of multistage manufacturing Processes , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.