Enhancing Effectiveness of Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger through Six Sigma DMAIC Phases

Abstract This research portrays the pilot implementation of Six Sigma DMAIC (Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control) phases to improve the effectiveness of shell and tube heat exchanger in a small sized furnace manufacturing company. Shell and tube heat exchanger is one of the critical components of the furnace. The imperative objective is to improve the quality of the furnace through DMAIC phases. In define phase, the critical to quality (CTQ) parameter was identified as effectiveness in shell and tube heat exchanger through the voice of the customer (VOC) and Pareto Chart. In measure phase, the present effectiveness was measured as 0.61. In analysis phase, the reason for the reduction of effectiveness was identified as less heat transfer area through cause and effect diagram. In improve phase, the existing design was modified through various alternative solutions by conducting brainstorming sessions. In this phase, the solution was identified with the introduction of circular fins over the bare tubes to improve the effectiveness in the shell and tube heat exchanger. Consequently, the effectiveness has been enhanced from 0.61 to 0.664. In control phase, the control strategies were recommended to sustain the improvements in shell and tube heat exchanger. In the end, the annual monetary savings of Rs.0.34 million were achieved through the implementation of DMAIC phases in the furnace manufacturing company.

[1]  Prasun Das,et al.  Improving efficiency and effectiveness of APQP process by using DFSS tools , 2009 .

[2]  Ashok Sarkar,et al.  Application of Six Sigma to improve the quality of the road for wind turbine installation , 2013 .

[3]  Matthew Franchetti,et al.  Process improvement for printing operations through the DMAIC Lean Six Sigma approach , 2010 .

[4]  Ala Hasan,et al.  Performance investigation of plain and finned tube evaporatively cooled heat exchangers , 2003 .

[5]  D. Copeland,et al.  A comparison of fin geometries for heatsinks in laminar forced convection: Part I - Round, elliptical, and plate fins in staggered and in-line configurations , 2001 .

[6]  D. Khanduja,et al.  Application of Six Sigma DMAIC methodology in thermal power plants: A case study , 2009 .

[7]  David C. Yen,et al.  Improving the efficiency of IT help-desk service by Six Sigma management methodology (DMAIC) – a case study of C company , 2011 .

[8]  R. Velraj,et al.  Experimental investigation on heat recovery from diesel engine exhaust using finned shell and tube heat exchanger and thermal storage system , 2011 .

[9]  Daniel Firka Six Sigma: an evolutionary analysis through case studies , 2010 .

[10]  Sung Jin Kim,et al.  Comparison of thermal performances of plate-fin and pin-fin heat sinks subject to an impinging flow , 2009 .

[11]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Common myths of six sigma demystified , 2008 .

[12]  M. Yovanovich,et al.  Simplified solutions to circular annular fins with contact resistance and end cooling , 1988 .

[13]  W. C. Lo,et al.  Six Sigma approach to improve surface precision of optical lenses in the injection-molding process , 2009 .