Why do evolutionary systems stick to the edge of chaos

SummaryThe long-term behaviour of dynamic systems can be classified in two different regimes, regular or chaotic, depending on the values of the control parameters, which are kept constant during the time evolution. Starting from slightly different initial conditions, a regular system converges to the same final trajectory, whereas a chaotic system follows two distinct trajectories exponentially diverging from each other.In spite of these differences, regular and chaotic systems share a common property: both arrive exponentially fast to their final destiny, becoming trapped there. In both cases one has finite transient times. This is not a profitable property in what concerns evolutionary strategies, where the eternal search for new forms, better than the current one, is imperative. That is why evolutionary dynamic systems tend to tune themselves in very particular situations in between regular and chaotic regimes. These particular situations present eternal transients, and the system actually never reaches its final destiny, preserving diversity. This feature allows the system to visit other regions of the space of possibilities, not only the tiny region covered by its final attractor.

[1]  Luca Peliti,et al.  Introduction to the statistical theory of Darwinian evolution , 1997, cond-mat/9712027.

[2]  R. Dawkins.  The Blind Watchmaker , 1986 .

[3]  Dietrich Stauffer,et al.  Evolution, money, war, and computers : non-traditional applications of computational statistical physics , 1999 .

[4]  C. Darwin.  The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, Or, The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life , 1859 .

[5]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[6]  Maurizio Serva,et al.  Diffusion reproduction processes , 1990 .

[7]  Per Bak,et al.  The Discovery of Self-Organized Criticality , 1996 .

[8]  S. Cebrat,et al.  Model of population evolution with and without eugenics , 1999 .

[9]  Sergei Maslov,et al.  Complexity and extremal dynamics , 1994 .

[10]  Per Bak,et al.  How Nature Works: The Science of Self‐Organized Criticality , 1997 .

[11]  P. M. C. de Oliveira,et al.  Computing Boolean Statistical Models , 1991 .

[12]  D. Raup,et al.  Mass Extinctions in the Marine Fossil Record , 1982, Science.

[13]  Tang,et al.  Self-Organized Criticality: An Explanation of 1/f Noise , 2011 .

[14]  J. Kirchner,et al.  No fractals in fossil extinction statistics , 1998, Nature.

[15]  Clive Richards,et al.  The Blind Watchmaker , 1987, Bristol Medico-Chirurgical Journal.

[16]  Liam Kemp,et al.  This wonderful life , 2003, SVR '03.

[17]  Albert Jacquard,et al.  Éloge de la différence : la génétique et les hommes , 1978 .

[18]  A. Gray,et al.  I. THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES BY MEANS OF NATURAL SELECTION , 1963 .

[19]  Bak,et al.  Punctuated equilibrium and criticality in a simple model of evolution. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[20]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  The origins of order , 1993 .

[21]  Bruce J. West,et al.  ON THE UBIQUITY OF 1/f NOISE , 1989 .

[22]  Michel Cabane,et al.  Aerosols in Titan's atmosphere : models, sampling techniques and chemical analysis , 1991 .