Analysis of space mapping algorithms for application to partitioned fluid–structure interaction problems

Summary Fluid–structure interactions (FSI) play a crucial role in many engineering fields. However, the computational cost associated with high-fidelity aeroelastic models currently precludes their direct use in industry, especially for strong interactions. The strongly coupled segregated problem—that results from domain partitioning—can be interpreted as an optimization problem of a fluid–structure interface residual. Multi-fidelity optimization techniques can therefore directly be applied to this problem in order to obtain the solution efficiently. In previous work, it is already shown that aggressive space mapping (ASM) can be used in this context. In this contribution, we extend the research towards the use of space mapping for FSI simulations. We investigate the performance of two other approaches, generalized space mapping and output space mapping, by application to both compressible and incompressible 2D problems. Moreover, an analysis of the influence of the applied low-fidelity model on the achievable speedup is presented. The results indicate that output space mapping is a viable alternative to ASM when applied in the context of solver coupling for partitioned FSI, showing similar performance as ASM and resulting in reductions in computational cost up to 50% with respect to the reference quasi-Newton method. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  W. Wall,et al.  Fixed-point fluid–structure interaction solvers with dynamic relaxation , 2008 .

[2]  Jan Vierendeels,et al.  Multi-level quasi-Newton coupling algorithms for the partitioned simulation of fluid-structure interaction , 2012 .

[3]  R. de Borst,et al.  Space/time multigrid for a fluid--structure-interaction problem , 2006 .

[4]  S. H. Chen,et al.  Electromagnetic optimization exploiting aggressive space mapping , 1995 .

[5]  Jean-Frédéric Gerbeau,et al.  A Quasi-Newton Algorithm Based on a Reduced Model for Fluid-Structure Interaction Problems in Blood Flows , 2003 .

[6]  Frederic Blom,et al.  A monolithical fluid-structure interaction algorithm applied to the piston problem , 1998 .

[7]  Cv Clemens Verhoosel,et al.  Uncertainty and Reliability Analysis of Fluid-Structure Stability Boundaries , 2009 .

[8]  S. Turek,et al.  Proposal for Numerical Benchmarking of Fluid-Structure Interaction between an Elastic Object and Laminar Incompressible Flow , 2006 .

[9]  John W. Bandler,et al.  Review of the Space Mapping Approach to Engineering Optimization and Modeling , 2000 .

[10]  A. H. van Zuijlen,et al.  Multi-Level Acceleration for Sub-Iterations in Partitioned Fluid-Structure Interaction , 2009 .

[11]  Jan Vierendeels,et al.  Implicit coupling of partitioned fluid-structure interaction problems with reduced order models , 2007 .

[12]  Qingsha S. Cheng,et al.  Advances in Space Mapping Technology Exploiting Implicit Space Mapping and Output Space Mapping , 2004 .

[13]  Paul Kuberry,et al.  A decoupling algorithm for fluid-structure interaction problems based on optimization , 2013 .

[14]  Jan Dirk Jansen,et al.  Accelerating iterative solution methods using reduced‐order models as solution predictors , 2006 .

[15]  F. Moukalled,et al.  A coupled finite volume solver for the solution of incompressible flows on unstructured grids , 2009, J. Comput. Phys..

[16]  Philip Cardiff,et al.  A large strain finite volume method for orthotropic bodies with general material orientations , 2014 .

[17]  Jan Vierendeels,et al.  A fast strong coupling algorithm for the partitioned fluid–structure interaction simulation of BMHVs , 2012, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[18]  Joris Degroote,et al.  The Quasi-Newton Least Squares Method: A New and Fast Secant Method Analyzed for Linear Systems , 2009, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[19]  Hester Bijl,et al.  Two level algorithms for partitioned fluid-structure interaction computations , 2006 .

[20]  P. W. Hemker,et al.  Space Mapping and Defect Correction , 2005 .

[21]  John W. Bandler,et al.  Coarse models for efficient space mapping optimisation of microwave structures , 2010 .

[22]  John W. Bandler,et al.  Design optimization of interdigital filters using aggressive space mapping and decomposition , 1997 .

[23]  Marcus Redhe,et al.  A multipoint version of space mapping optimization applied to vehicle crashworthiness design , 2006 .

[24]  Michael Herty,et al.  Towards a space mapping approach to dynamic compressor optimization of gas networks , 2011 .

[25]  Wulf G. Dettmer,et al.  Analysis of the block Gauss–Seidel solution procedure for a strongly coupled model problem with reference to fluid–structure interaction , 2009 .

[26]  Hester Bijl,et al.  Space-mapping in fluid–structure interaction problems , 2014 .

[27]  Jan Vierendeels,et al.  Multi-solver algorithms for the partitioned simulation of fluid–structure interaction , 2011 .

[28]  John W. Bandler,et al.  Towards a rigorous formulation of the space mapping technique for engineering design , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[29]  John W. Bandler,et al.  A generalized space-mapping tableau approach to device modeling , 2001 .

[30]  Joris Degroote,et al.  On the Similarities Between the Quasi-Newton Inverse Least Squares Method and GMRes , 2010, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[31]  Cornel Marius Murea,et al.  A fast method for solving fluid–structure interaction problems numerically , 2009 .

[32]  René de Borst,et al.  An investigation of Interface-GMRES(R) for fluid–structure interaction problems with flutter and divergence , 2011 .

[33]  L. Encica,et al.  Aggressive Output Space-Mapping Optimization for Electromagnetic Actuators , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[34]  C. Farhat,et al.  Partitioned procedures for the transient solution of coupled aroelastic problems Part I: Model problem, theory and two-dimensional application , 1995 .

[35]  S. Koziel,et al.  Space Mapping Optimization Algorithms for Engineering Design , 2006, 2006 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest.

[36]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  Partitioned procedures for the transient solution of coupled aeroelastic problems , 2001 .

[37]  K. Bathe,et al.  Performance of a new partitioned procedure versus a monolithic procedure in fluid-structure interaction , 2009 .

[38]  van Eh Harald Brummelen,et al.  An interface Newton–Krylov solver for fluid–structure interaction , 2005 .

[39]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  Partitioned analysis of coupled mechanical systems , 2001 .

[40]  J.W. Bandler,et al.  Space mapping: the state of the art , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.