Linguistic change in intonation: The use of high rising terminals in New Zealand English

This article reports sociolinguistic research on linguistic change in an intonation feature of New Zealand English, namely, the use of high rising terminal contours (HRTs) in declarative clauses. Recorded interviews from 75 inhabitants of Porirua, a small city north of Wellington, were analyzed for the use of HRTs. The speaker sample was subdivided according to years of age (20–29, 40–49, 70–79), sex, ethnicity (Maori and Pakeha), and class (working and middle). The results show that linguistic change is in progress, the use of HRTs being favored by young Maori and by young Pakeha women. The results are explained in terms of the function of HRTs as positive politeness markers. The usefulness of the term “linguistic variable” in the analysis of intonational change and discourse features is assessed.

[1]  J. Holmes.  Functions of you know in women's and men's speech , 1986, Language in Society.

[2]  M. Selting,et al.  The role of intonation in the organization of repair and problem handling sequences in conversation , 1988 .

[3]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Referring as a collaborative process , 1986, Cognition.

[4]  Laurie Bauer,et al.  Notes on New Zealand English Phonetics and Phonology , 1986 .

[5]  Elizabeth Dines.  Variation in discourse—“and stuff like that” , 1980, Language in Society.

[6]  N. Besnier,et al.  The Linguistic Relationships of Spoken and Written Nukulaelae , 1988 .

[7]  Gregory R. Guy,et al.  An intonational change in progress in Australian English , 1986, Language in Society.

[8]  Ronald Geluykens,et al.  Intonation and speech act type: An experimental approach to rising intonation in queclaratives , 1987 .

[9]  Beatriz R. Lavandera.  Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop? , 1978, Language in Society.

[10]  Donn Bayard.  English around the world: Social constraints on the phonology of New Zealand English , 1991 .

[11]  Jenny Cheshire.  Syntactic variation, the linguistic variable, and sociolinguistic theory , 1987 .

[12]  R. Hasan.  Semantic variation and sociolinguistics , 1989 .

[13]  D. Billings.  Expressive style and culture: Individualism and group orientation contrasted , 1987, Language in Society.

[14]  Jenny Cheshire,et al.  Gender issues in the GCSE ORAL English examination: Part II , 1990 .

[15]  W. Labov.  The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change , 1990, Language Variation and Change.

[16]  N. Ellis,et al.  The role of spelling in learning to read , 1990 .

[17]  C. Linde,et al.  Spatial Networks as a Site for the Study of Language and Thought. , 1975 .

[18]  M. K. Ching.  The Question Intonation in Assertions , 1982 .

[19]  Gregory R. Guy,et al.  The meaning of an intonation in Australian English , 1984 .

[20]  A. Bell.  Language style as audience design , 1984, Language in Society.

[21]  Keith Allan,et al.  The component functions of the high Rise terminal contour in Australian declarative sentences , 1984 .

[22]  P. Eckert.  The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation , 1989, Language Variation and Change.

[23]  N. Besnier.  Information withholding as a manipulative and collusive strategy in Nukulaelae gossip , 1989, Language in Society.

[24]  Koenraad Kuiper.  English around the world: Sporting formulae in New Zealand English: two models of male solidarity , 1991 .

[25]  Richard A. Benton,et al.  English around the world: Maori English: a New Zealand myth? , 1991 .