Informed Expectations to Guide GDA Agents in Partially Observable Environments

Goal Driven Autonomy (GDA) is an agent model for reasoning about goals while acting in a dynamic environment. Since anomalous events may cause an agent's current goal to become invalid, GDA agents monitor the environment for such anomalies. When domains are both partially observable and dynamic, agents must reason about sensing and planning actions. Previous GDA work evaluated agents in domains that were partially observable, but does not address sensing actions with associated costs. Furthermore, partial observability still enabled generation of a grounded plan to reach the goal. We study agents where observability is more limited: the agent cannot generate a grounded plan because it does not know which future actions will be available until it explores more of the environment. We present a formalism of the problem that includes sensing costs, a GDA algorithm using this formalism, an examination of four methods of expectations under this formalism, and an implementation of the algorithm and empirical study.

[1]  David W. Aha,et al.  Applying Goal Driven Autonomy to a Team Shooter Game , 2010, FLAIRS.

[2]  David W. Aha,et al.  Learning and Reusing Goal-Specific Policies for Goal-Driven Autonomy , 2012, ICCBR.

[3]  Yung-Hsiang Lu,et al.  A case study of mobile robot's energy consumption and conservation techniques , 2005, ICAR '05. Proceedings., 12th International Conference on Advanced Robotics, 2005..

[4]  David E. Smith Choosing Objectives in OverSubscription Planning , 2004 .

[5]  Alon Y. Halevy,et al.  An adaptive query execution system for data integration , 1999, SIGMOD '99.

[6]  Craig A. Knoblock Planning, Executing, Sensing, and Replanning for Information Gathering , 1995, IJCAI.

[7]  David W. Aha,et al.  Integrated Learning for Goal-Driven Autonomy , 2011, IJCAI.

[8]  J. Meigs,et al.  WHO Technical Report , 1954, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[9]  Arnav Jhala,et al.  Applying Goal-Driven Autonomy to StarCraft , 2010, AIIDE.

[10]  Tom Michael Mitchell,et al.  Explanation-based generalization: A unifying view , 1986 .

[11]  Paolo Traverso,et al.  The actor's view of automated planning and acting: A position paper , 2014, Artif. Intell..

[12]  Blai Bonet,et al.  Learning Depth-First Search: A Unified Approach to Heuristic Search in Deterministic and Non-Deterministic Settings, and Its Application to MDPs , 2006, ICAPS.

[13]  Servicio Geológico Colombiano Sgc Volume 4 , 2013, Journal of Diabetes Investigation.

[14]  David W. Aha,et al.  Goal-Driven Autonomy with Case-Based Reasoning , 2010, ICCBR.

[15]  David E. Smith Choosing Objectives in Over-Subscription Planning , 2004, ICAPS.

[16]  Leslie Pack Kaelbling,et al.  Planning and Acting in Partially Observable Stochastic Domains , 1998, Artif. Intell..

[17]  P. G. Tizien,et al.  Santa Cruz , 2006 .

[18]  Robert P. Goldman,et al.  Planning with Observations and Knowledge , 1996 .

[19]  Nils J. Nilsson,et al.  Artificial Intelligence , 1974, IFIP Congress.

[20]  Arnav Jhala,et al.  Learning from Demonstration for Goal-Driven Autonomy , 2012, AAAI.

[21]  Ben George Weber,et al.  Integrating Learning in a Multi-Scale Agent , 2012 .

[22]  Onn Shehory,et al.  A Planning Component for RETSINA Agents , 1999, ATAL.

[23]  Hector Muñoz-Avila,et al.  Raising Expectations in GDA Agents Acting in Dynamic Environments , 2015, IJCAI.

[24]  Volume 28 , 2003, Intensive Care Medicine.

[25]  Héctor Muñoz-Avila,et al.  LUIGi: A Goal-Driven Autonomy Agent Reasoning with Ontologies , 2013 .

[26]  S WeldDaniel,et al.  An adaptive query execution system for data integration , 1999 .

[27]  David W. Aha,et al.  Goal-Driven Autonomy in a Navy Strategy Simulation , 2010, AAAI.

[28]  Richard Fikes,et al.  STRIPS: A New Approach to the Application of Theorem Proving to Problem Solving , 1971, IJCAI.

[29]  D. Nau,et al.  Hierarchical Goal Networks and Goal-Driven Autonomy: Going where AI Planning Meets Goal Reasoning , 2013 .

[30]  Craig A. Knoblock Building a Planner for Information Gathering: A Report from the Trenches , 1996, AIPS.

[31]  David W. Aha,et al.  Iterative Goal Refinement for Robotics , 2014 .