Differences and intersubject variability of loudness discomfort levels measured in sound pressure level and hearing level for TDH-50P and ER-3A earphones.

Loudness discomfort levels (LDLs) were measured in dB HL and SPL at discrete frequencies between 500 to 4000 Hz on 31 hearing-impaired ears using TDH-50P and ER-3A earphones. The results revealed no significant differences in the measured sound pressure level (SPL) between the two earphones at all test frequencies. However, with dB HL measurements, statistically significant differences were revealed at 1500 and 4000 Hz between earphone conditions. The results also revealed large intersubject differences in the measured LDL (HL and SPL) for both earphones. The results of this study highlight the difficulty in accurately predicting individual performance from averaged group data.

[1]  Michael Valente,et al.  Strategies for Selecting and Verifying Hearing Aid Fittings. , 1994 .

[2]  D. Hawkins.  Clinical Ear Canal Probe Tube Measurements , 1987, Ear and hearing.

[3]  F. Lindgren.  A comparison of the variability in thresholds measured with insert and conventional supra-aural earphones. , 1990, Scandinavian audiology.

[4]  Thresholds of discomfort in young children. , 1991, Ear and hearing.

[5]  W. A. Cooper,et al.  Reference threshold sound-pressure levels for the TDH-50 and ER-3A earphones. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  D. Dirks,et al.  Optical method for measurement of ear canal length. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  B E Walden,et al.  Description and validation of an LDL procedure designed to select SSPL90. , 1987, Ear and hearing.

[8]  S B Luks,et al.  Clinical applicability of insert earphones for audiometry. , 1989, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[9]  P G Stelmachowicz,et al.  Probe-tube microphone measures of ear-canal sound pressure levels in infants and children. , 1989, Ear and hearing.

[10]  M Valente,et al.  Reliability and intersubject variability of the real ear unaided response. , 1991, Ear and hearing.

[11]  D L Zelisko,et al.  Signal delivery/real ear measurement system for hearing aid selection and fitting. , 1992, Ear and hearing.

[12]  R M Cox.  NBS-9A coupler-to-eardrum transformation: TDH-39 and TDH-49 earphones. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Harvey Dillon,et al.  Loudness discomfort level measurements and their implications for the design and fitting of hearing aids , 1984 .

[14]  D D Dirks,et al.  Acoustics of ear canal measurement of eardrum SPL in simulators. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Clark Jl,et al.  Three studies comparing performance of the ER-3A tubephone with the TDH-50P earphone. , 1988 .

[16]  J. L. Clark,et al.  Three studies comparing performance of the ER-3A tubephone with the TDH-50P earphone. , 1988, Ear and hearing.

[17]  Robert E. Sandlin,et al.  Understanding digitally programmable hearing aids , 1994 .

[18]  D D Dirks,et al.  Effect of sensorineural hearing loss on loudness discomfort level and most comfortable loudness judgments. , 1978, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[19]  F H Bess,et al.  Ability to achieve gain/frequency response and SSPL-90 under three prescription formulas with in-the-ear hearing aids. , 1993, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[20]  L. Wilber,et al.  Reference thresholds for the ER-3A insert earphone. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  M. Killion,et al.  Clinical Use of an Insert Earphone , 1986, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[22]  W. A. Cooper,et al.  Comparisons among SPLs in real ears, 2 cm3 and 6 cm3 couplers. , 1990, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[23]  F. Alan Andersen,et al.  The American National Standards Institute , 1984, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[24]  D. Lilly,et al.  On the Routine Use of TubephoneTM Insert Earphones. , 1993, American journal of audiology.

[25]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  Foundations of Behavioral Research , 1973 .

[26]  D B Hawkins,et al.  Use of probe tube microphone measurements in hearing aid selection for children: some initial clinical experiences. , 1989, Ear and hearing.

[27]  D D Dirks,et al.  Basic Acoustic Considerations of Ear Canal: Probe Measurements , 1987, Ear and hearing.

[28]  J. Goebel,et al.  Intersubject variability of real-ear sound pressure level: conventional and insert earphones. , 1994, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[29]  C D Geisler,et al.  Estimation of eardrum acoustic pressure and of ear canal length from remote points in the canal. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  R M Cox,et al.  Evaluation of an in-situ output probe-microphone method for hearing aid fitting verification. , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[31]  C V Pavlovic,et al.  Transfer functions and correction factors used in hearing aid evaluation and research. , 1989, Ear and hearing.