Faculty self-archiving: Motivations and barriers

This study investigated factors that motivate or impede faculty participation in self-archiving practices—the placement of research work in various open access (OA) venues, ranging from personal Web pages to OA archives. The author's research design involves triangulation of survey and interview data from 17 Carnegie doctorate universities with DSpace institutional repositories. The analysis of survey responses from 684 professors and 41 telephone interviews identified seven significant factors: (a) altruism—the idea of providing OA benefits for users; (b) perceived self-archiving culture; (c) copyright concerns; (d) technical skills; (e) age; (f) perception of no harmful impact of self-archiving on tenure and promotion; and (g) concerns about additional time and effort. The factors are listed in descending order of their effect size. Age, copyright concerns, and additional time and effort are negatively associated with self-archiving, whereas remaining factors are positively related to it. Faculty are motivated by OA advantages to users, disciplinary norms, and no negative influence on academic reward. However, barriers to self-archiving—concerns about copyright, extra time and effort, technical ability, and age—imply that the provision of services to assist faculty with copyright management, and with technical and logistical issues, could encourage higher rates of self-archiving. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Rob Kling,et al.  Electronic journals, the Internet, and scholarly communication , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[2]  K. Antelman.  Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact? , 2004 .

[3]  Stephen Pinfield.  How Do Physicists Use an E-Print Archive? , 2001, D Lib Mag..

[4]  Les Carr,et al.  The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access: An Update , 2008 .

[5]  Panayiota Polydoratou.  Use and linkage of source and output repositories: interviews with chemistry researchers , 2008, Aslib Proc..

[6]  Sarah Watson,et al.  Authors' attitudes to, and awareness and use of, a university institutional repository. , 2007 .

[7]  Leslie Chan,et al.  Supporting and Enhancing Scholarship in the Digital Age: The Role of Open-Access Institutional Repositories , 2004 .

[8]  Charlotte Tschider.  Investigating the public in the Public Library of Science: Gifting economics in the Internet community , 2006, First Monday.

[9]  S. Lawrence.  Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact , 2001, Nature.

[10]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: an exploratory study of determinants , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  RoMEO Studies 2: How Academics Want to Protect their Open-Access Research Papers , 2003, J. Inf. Sci..

[12]  Clifford A. Lynch,et al.  Institutional Repository Deployment in the United States as of Early 2005 , 2005, D-Lib Magazine.

[13]  Philip M. Davis,et al.  Institutional Repositories: Evaluating the Reasons for Non-use of Cornell University's Installation of DSpace , 2007, D Lib Mag..

[14]  D. Covey.  Self-Archiving Journal Articles: A Case Study of Faculty Practice and Missed Opportunity. , 2009 .

[15]  Theo Andrew.  Trends in Self-Posting of Research Material Online by Academic Staff , 2003 .

[16]  Ibironke O. Lawal,et al.  Scholarly Communication: The Use and Non-Use of E-Print Archives for the Dissemination of Scientific Information , 2002, Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship.

[17]  Lee Sproull,et al.  What's Mine Is Ours, or Is It? A Study of Attitudes about Information Sharing , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  RoMEO studies 1: the impact of copyright ownership on academic author self-archiving , 2003, J. Documentation.

[19]  Cecelia Brown.  The e-volution of preprints in the scholarly communication of physicists and astronomers , 2001 .

[20]  N. House.  Digital libraries and practices of trust: Networked biodiversity information , 2002 .

[21]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  The future of the quality assurance system: its impact on the social and professional recognition of scientists in the era of electronic publishing , 1997, J. Inf. Sci..

[22]  Kate Manuel.  The Place of E-Prints in the Publication Patterns of Physical Scientists , 2001 .

[23]  Susan Gibbons,et al.  Understanding Faculty to Improve Content Recruitment for Institutional Repositories , 2005, D Lib Mag..

[24]  Hazel Hall,et al.  Borrowed theory: Applying exchange theories in information science research , 2003 .

[25]  Ian Rowlands,et al.  Scholarly communication in the digital environment: what do authors want? , 2004, Learn. Publ..

[26]  Kathleen Shearer.  Institutional repositories: Towards the identification of critical success factors , 2003 .

[27]  S. Harnad,et al.  Comparing the Impact of Open Access (OA) vs. Non-OA Articles in the Same Journals , 2004 .

[28]  Philip M. Davis,et al.  Does the arXiv lead to higher citations and reduced publisher downloads for mathematics articles? , 2006, Scientometrics.

[29]  Rob Kling,et al.  a Bit More to It: Scholarly Communication Forums as Socio-technical Interaction Networks , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[30]  Ingemar Bohlin,et al.  Communication Regimes in Competition , 2004 .

[31]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation , 2005, MIS Q..

[32]  Raym Crow,et al.  The case for institutional repositories : a SPARC position paper , 2002 .

[33]  Linda D. Molm.  Coercive Power in Social Exchange: Social exchange and power , 1997 .

[34]  M. HamidR.Jamali,et al.  Open access in context: a user study , 2007, J. Documentation.

[35]  Stephen S. Murray,et al.  The effect of use and access on citations , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..

[36]  Stevan Harnad,et al.  Ten-Year Cross-Disciplinary Comparison of the Growth of Open Access and How it Increases Research Citation Impact , 2005, IEEE Data Eng. Bull..