Innovative Piloting Technique for a Semi-Autonomous UAV Lighter-Than-Air Platform Simulator

UAS design has in these years reached a point in which trends and objectives are well beyond the actual test capabilities. The tendency of the past to build and test has clearly been overridden by new design concepts for many reasons, one of these being the scarce or null possibility of testing safety-critical systems such as UAV systems. This is the context in which the Elettra-Twin-Flyer (ETF) Simulator is constantly upgraded and rearranged to incorporate new features and more advanced capabilities. In this paper it is shown how the piloting modes have been differentiated, to improve the airship autonomy and allow path following operations. Innovative piloting tools have been introduced and a new Human-Machine-Interface has been proposed along.

[1]  Manuela Battipede,et al.  Control Allocation System for an Innovative Remotely-Piloted Airship , 2004 .

[2]  Robert M. Taylor,et al.  From Safety Net to Augmented Cognition: Using Flexible Autonomy Levels for On-Line Cognitive Assistance and Automation , 2003 .

[3]  Rongming Zhu,et al.  UAV Path Generation, Path Following and Gimbal Control , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control.

[4]  Vikram Kapila,et al.  Optimal path planning for unmanned air vehicles with kinematic and tactical constraints , 2002, Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2002..

[5]  G.J.M. Koeners,et al.  Terrain following and terrain avoidance with synthetic vision , 2005, 24th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[6]  Manuela Battipede,et al.  Prototype Assembling of the Nautilus Remotely-Piloted Lighter-Than-Air Platform , 2005 .

[7]  Toshio Fukuda,et al.  Path Planning And Control Of Pipeline Inspection And Maintenance Robot , 1988, Proceedings.14 Annual Conference of Industrial Electronics Society.

[8]  Manuela Battipede,et al.  Ground Station and Flight Simulator for a Remotely-Piloted Non Conventional Airship , 2005 .

[9]  Manuela Battipede,et al.  Validation of the Fault Mitigation Procedures for the Unmanned Elettra-Twin-Flyer Airship , 2007 .

[10]  Enrico Ciulli.  Elementi di meccanica , 2003 .

[11]  Hongsheng Xi,et al.  Simulation-Based Optimization of Singularly Perturbed Markov Reward Processes with States Aggregation , 2005, ICIC.

[12]  Timothy W. McLain,et al.  Real-time dynamic trajectory smoothing for unmanned air vehicles , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[13]  Bruce T Clough,et al.  Metrics, Schmetrics! How The Heck Do You Determine A UAV's Autonomy Anyway , 2002 .

[14]  Manuela Battipede,et al.  Flight Simulator for the Control Law Design of an Innovative Remotely-Piloted Airship , 2004 .

[15]  D.M. Coleman,et al.  O3: An optimal and opportunistic path planner (with obstacle avoidance) using voronoi polygons , 2008, 2008 10th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control.

[16]  Manuela Battipede,et al.  Peculiar Performance of a New Lighter-Than-Air Platform for Monitoring , 2004 .

[17]  S. Areibi,et al.  Genetic algorithm for dynamic path planning , 2004, Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering 2004 (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37513).

[18]  Atilla Dogan,et al.  Probabilistic Path Planning for UAVs , 2003 .

[19]  Igor Skrjanc,et al.  Time optimal path planning considering acceleration limits , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[20]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[21]  Milos Zefran,et al.  Optimal control of robotic systems with logical constraints: Application to UAV path planning , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[22]  M. Pachter,et al.  Challenges of autonomous control , 1998 .

[23]  G. Ambrosino,et al.  Algorithms for 3D UAV Path Generation and Tracking , 2006, Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[24]  Bruce Clough,et al.  Metrics, Schmetrics! How Do You Track a UAV's Autonomy? , 2002 .