Heterogeneity in Pure Microbial Systems: Experimental Measurements and Modeling

Cellular heterogeneity influences bioprocess performance in ways that until date are not completely elucidated. In order to account for this phenomenon in the design and operation of bioprocesses, reliable analytical and mathematical descriptions are required. We present an overview of the single cell analysis, and the mathematical modeling frameworks that have potential to be used in bioprocess control and optimization, in particular for microbial processes. In order to be suitable for bioprocess monitoring, experimental methods need to be high throughput and to require relatively short processing time. One such method used successfully under dynamic conditions is flow cytometry. Population balance and individual based models are suitable modeling options, the latter one having in particular a good potential to integrate the various data collected through experimentation. This will be highly beneficial for appropriate process design and scale up as a more rigorous approach may prevent a priori unwanted performance losses. It will also help progressing synthetic biology applications to industrial scale.

[1]  Vasile Lavric,et al.  Birth, growth and death as structuring operators in bacterial population dynamics. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  M. A. Henson Dynamic modeling of microbial cell populations. , 2003, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[3]  A. E. Vasdekis,et al.  Origins of Cell-to-Cell Bioprocessing Diversity and Implications of the Extracellular Environment Revealed at the Single-Cell Level , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[4]  R. Zenobi,et al.  Analytical techniques for single-cell metabolomics: state of the art and trends , 2010, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[5]  Ju Chu,et al.  Application of EulerLagrange CFD for quantitative evaluating the effect of shear force on Carthamus tinctorius L. cell in a stirred tank bioreactor , 2016 .

[6]  A. Arkin,et al.  Contextualizing context for synthetic biology – identifying causes of failure of synthetic biological systems , 2012, Biotechnology journal.

[7]  F. Hellweger,et al.  Is the whole the sum of its parts? Agent-based modelling of wastewater treatment systems. , 2011, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[8]  L. G. de la Torre,et al.  Microfluidic tools toward industrial biotechnology , 2016, Biotechnology progress.

[9]  Peter Neubauer,et al.  Direct and indirect use of GFP whole cell biosensors for the assessment of bioprocess performances: Design of milliliter scale‐down bioreactors , 2013, Biotechnology progress.

[10]  Oliver Frick,et al.  An Inert Continuous Microreactor for the Isolation and Analysis of a Single Microbial Cell , 2015, Micromachines.

[11]  Thomas Bley,et al.  From single cells to microbial population dynamics: modelling in biotechnology based on measurements of individual cells. , 2011, Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology.

[12]  Matthew R. Bennett,et al.  Emergent genetic oscillations in a synthetic microbial consortium , 2015, Science.

[13]  W. Waegeman,et al.  Flow Cytometric Single-Cell Identification of Populations in Synthetic Bacterial Communities , 2017, PloS one.

[14]  Tim W. Overton,et al.  Use of a stress-minimisation paradigm in high cell density fed-batch Escherichia coli fermentations to optimise recombinant protein production , 2014, Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology.

[15]  A. Konopka,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of Microbial Community Dynamics: A Methodological Review , 2014 .

[16]  Christian Larroche Current developments in biotechnology and bioengineering. Bioprocesses, bioreactors and controls , 2017 .

[17]  Wolfgang Wiechert,et al.  A disposable picolitre bioreactor for cultivation and investigation of industrially relevant bacteria on the single cell level. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[18]  Xiaolin Cui,et al.  Single‐cell analysis for bioprocessing , 2015 .

[19]  Alvin W Nienow,et al.  A comparison of high cell density fed‐batch fermentations involving both induced and non‐induced recombinant Escherichia coli under well‐mixed small‐scale and simulated poorly mixed large‐scale conditions , 2007, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[20]  Thomas Bley,et al.  Origin and analysis of microbial population heterogeneity in bioprocesses. , 2010, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[21]  David W. Graham,et al.  Non-linear population dynamics in chemostats associated with live–dead cell cycling in Escherichia coli strain K12-MG1655 , 2011, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[22]  Orkun S. Soyer,et al.  The Details in the Distributions: Why and How to Study Phenotypic Variability This Review Comes from a Themed Issue on Systems Biology Experimental Methods for Studying Phenotypic Variability within Genotype Variability between Genotype Variation between Plate Technical Variation between Environment , 2022 .

[23]  Byron F. Brehm-Stecher,et al.  Single-Cell Microbiology: Tools, Technologies, and Applications , 2004, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[24]  Tim W. Overton,et al.  Flow cytometric analysis of E. coli on agar plates: implications for recombinant protein production , 2014, Biotechnology Letters.

[25]  Cleo Kontoravdi,et al.  Integration of models and experimentation to optimise the production of potential biotherapeutics. , 2013, Drug discovery today.

[26]  A. Schmid,et al.  Microfluidic single-cell analysis links boundary environments and individual microbial phenotypes. , 2015, Environmental microbiology.

[27]  R Takors,et al.  Scale-up of microbial processes: impacts, tools and open questions. , 2012, Journal of biotechnology.

[28]  Edward R Sumner,et al.  Phenotypic heterogeneity: differential stress resistance among individual cells of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2002, Microbiology.

[29]  B. Ryall,et al.  Culture History and Population Heterogeneity as Determinants of Bacterial Adaptation: the Adaptomics of a Single Environmental Transition , 2012, Microbiology and Molecular Reviews.

[30]  Jérôme Morchain,et al.  Coupling of biokinetic and population balance models to account for biological heterogeneity in bioreactors , 2013 .

[31]  C. Hewitt,et al.  The use of multi-parameter flow cytometry to compare the physiological response of Escherichia coli W3110 to glucose limitation during batch, fed-batch and continuous culture cultivations. , 1999, Journal of biotechnology.

[32]  Jessica Grote,et al.  Phenotypic Heterogeneity, a Phenomenon That May Explain Why Quorum Sensing Does Not Always Result in Truly Homogenous Cell Behavior , 2015, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[33]  M. Lidstrom,et al.  The role of physiological heterogeneity in microbial population behavior. , 2010, Nature chemical biology.

[34]  Jérôme Morchain,et al.  Investigating the interactions between physical and biological heterogeneities in bioreactors using compartment, population balance and metabolic models , 2015 .

[35]  I. Booth,et al.  Stress and the single cell: intrapopulation diversity is a mechanism to ensure survival upon exposure to stress. , 2002, International journal of food microbiology.

[36]  Patrick Fickers,et al.  Microbial population heterogeneity versus bioreactor heterogeneity: Evaluation of Redox Sensor Green as an exogenous metabolic biosensor , 2016 .

[37]  Jonathan V Sweedler,et al.  Progress toward single cell metabolomics. , 2013, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[38]  S. Müller,et al.  Functional single-cell analyses: flow cytometry and cell sorting of microbial populations and communities. , 2010, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[39]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Bayesian emulation of complex multi-output and dynamic computer models , 2010 .

[40]  Alan W. Mahoney,et al.  Population balance modeling. Promise for the future , 2002 .

[41]  Alexander Grünberger,et al.  Application of Mini- and Micro-Bioreactors for Microbial Bioprocesses , 2017 .

[42]  Yu Tao,et al.  A critical review of NanoSIMS in analysis of microbial metabolic activities at single-cell level , 2016, Critical reviews in biotechnology.

[43]  Eric Mjolsness,et al.  Measuring single-cell gene expression dynamics in bacteria using fluorescence time-lapse microscopy , 2011, Nature Protocols.

[44]  Andrew Phillips,et al.  Computational modeling of synthetic microbial biofilms. , 2012, ACS synthetic biology.

[45]  H M Davey,et al.  Flow cytometric analysis of microorganisms. , 2000, Methods.

[46]  Weiwen Zhang,et al.  Integrating multiple 'omics' analysis for microbial biology: application and methodologies. , 2010, Microbiology.

[47]  Wolfgang Wiechert,et al.  Single-cell microfluidics: opportunity for bioprocess development. , 2014, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[48]  Luis A. García,et al.  Application of flow cytometry to industrial microbial bioprocesses , 2010 .

[49]  Ferdi L. Hellweger,et al.  Advancing microbial sciences by individual-based modelling , 2016, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[50]  Alvaro Juan Ojeda Garcia Mathematical and computational , 2012 .

[51]  M. Kuypers,et al.  Detecting metabolic activities in single cells, with emphasis on nanoSIMS. , 2012, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[52]  P. Gupta,et al.  Gaussian process emulation of an individual-based model simulation of microbial communities , 2017, J. Comput. Sci..

[53]  Vasile Lavric,et al.  Conditional confined oscillatory dynamics of Escherichia coli strain K12-MG1655 in chemostat systems , 2011, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[54]  A. G. Fredrickson,et al.  A new set of population balance equations for microbial and cell cultures , 2002 .

[55]  Ian P Thompson,et al.  Raman microscopic analysis of single microbial cells. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[56]  Germán L. Rosano,et al.  Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli: advances and challenges , 2014, Front. Microbiol..

[57]  Bo Kara,et al.  Studies related to antibody fragment (Fab) production in Escherichia coli W3110 fed‐batch fermentation processes using multiparameter flow cytometry , 2009, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[58]  Emily G. Armitage,et al.  Imaging of metabolites using secondary ion mass spectrometry , 2012, Metabolomics.

[59]  Anália Lourenço,et al.  Computational resources and strategies to construct single-molecule metabolic models of microbial cells , 2016, Briefings Bioinform..

[60]  Krist V Gernaey,et al.  Physiological heterogeneities in microbial populations and implications for physical stress tolerance , 2012, Microbial Cell Factories.

[61]  Jana Seifert,et al.  Subpopulation-proteomics in prokaryotic populations. , 2013, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[62]  Elizabeth Sklar,et al.  NetLogo, a Multi-agent Simulation Environment , 2007, Artificial Life.

[63]  E. Sklar Software Review: NetLogo, a Multi-agent Simulation Environment , 2007 .

[64]  Ralf Takors,et al.  Engineering E. coli for large-scale production - Strategies considering ATP expenses and transcriptional responses. , 2016, Metabolic engineering.

[65]  Fuzhong Zhang,et al.  Exploiting nongenetic cell-to-cell variation for enhanced biosynthesis. , 2016, Nature chemical biology.

[66]  Ingmar Nopens,et al.  Cell mass and cell cycle dynamics of an asynchronous budding yeast population: Experimental observations, flow cytometry data analysis, and multi‐scale modeling , 2013, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[67]  Alvaro R. Lara,et al.  Living with heterogeneities in bioreactors , 2006, Molecular biotechnology.

[68]  Diethard Mattanovich,et al.  Construction of microbial cell factories for industrial bioprocesses , 2012 .

[69]  Tim W. Nattkemper,et al.  Omics Fusion - A Platform for Integrative Analysis of Omics Data , 2016, J. Integr. Bioinform..

[70]  Hazel M Davey,et al.  Using flow cytometry to quantify microbial heterogeneity. , 2003, Current issues in molecular biology.

[71]  Marian Gheorghe,et al.  Large-Scale Simulations with FLAME , 2016 .

[72]  D. Ramkrishna,et al.  Population balance modeling: current status and future prospects. , 2014, Annual review of chemical and biomolecular engineering.

[73]  Verónica Ambriz-Aviña,et al.  Applications of Flow Cytometry to Characterize Bacterial Physiological Responses , 2014, BioMed research international.

[74]  Steven F. Railsback,et al.  Agent-Based and Individual-Based Modeling: A Practical Introduction , 2011 .

[75]  Deirdre R. Meldrum,et al.  Measuring gene expression in single bacterial cells: recent advances in methods and micro-devices , 2015, Critical reviews in biotechnology.

[76]  Stephen R Quake,et al.  Optofluidic cell selection from complex microbial communities for single-genome analysis. , 2013, Methods in enzymology.

[77]  Julia Frunzke,et al.  Monitoring of population dynamics of Corynebacterium glutamicum by multiparameter flow cytometry , 2012, Microbial biotechnology.

[78]  S. Sørensen,et al.  Experimental methods and modeling techniques for description of cell population heterogeneity. , 2011, Biotechnology advances.

[79]  Susanna Zucca,et al.  Advances and Computational Tools towards Predictable Design in Biological Engineering , 2014, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[80]  Michail Stamatakis,et al.  A mathematical and computational approach for integrating the major sources of cell population heterogeneity. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[81]  Ralf Takors,et al.  Lagrangian Trajectories to Predict the Formation of Population Heterogeneity in Large-Scale Bioreactors , 2017, Bioengineering.

[82]  A. Singh,et al.  Single Cell Protein Analysis , 2015, Methods in Molecular Biology.

[83]  Matthias Reuss,et al.  Dynamic Behavior of Microbial Populations in Stirred Bioreactors Simulated with Euler−Lagrange Methods: Traveling along the Lifelines of Single Cells† , 2004 .

[84]  Stephan Noack,et al.  Modeling synchronous growth of bacterial populations in phased cultivation , 2008, Bioprocess and biosystems engineering.

[85]  P. McKay,et al.  Flow cytometric analysis. , 2000, Methods in molecular medicine.

[86]  D. Wilkinson Stochastic modelling for quantitative description of heterogeneous biological systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[87]  Cees Haringa,et al.  Lagrangian modeling of hydrodynamic–kinetic interactions in (bio)chemical reactors: Practical implementation and setup guidelines , 2017 .

[88]  C. Hansen,et al.  Microfluidic single cell analysis: from promise to practice. , 2012, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[89]  H M Shapiro,et al.  Microbial analysis at the single-cell level: tasks and techniques. , 2000, Journal of microbiological methods.

[90]  Benedikt G. Brink,et al.  Omics Fusion – A Platform for Integrative Analysis of Omics Data , 2016, Journal of integrative bioinformatics.

[91]  Cristian Picioreanu,et al.  iDynoMiCS: next-generation individual-based modelling of biofilms. , 2011, Environmental microbiology.

[92]  Lingchong You,et al.  Predictive power of cell-to-cell variability , 2013, Quantitative Biology.

[93]  Jérôme Morchain Numerical tools for scaling up bioreactors , 2017 .

[94]  Martin Ackermann,et al.  A growing focus on bacterial individuality. , 2015, Environmental microbiology.

[95]  J Christopher Love,et al.  Microtools for single-cell analysis in biopharmaceutical development and manufacturing. , 2013, Trends in biotechnology.

[96]  Clara Prats,et al.  Individual-based Modelling: An Essential Tool for Microbiology , 2008, Journal of biological physics.

[97]  M L Shuler,et al.  Single-cell models: promise and limitations. , 1999, Journal of biotechnology.

[98]  Matthias Heinemann,et al.  Single cell metabolomics. , 2011, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[99]  Ilias Tagkopoulos,et al.  Multi-omics integration accurately predicts cellular state in unexplored conditions for Escherichia coli , 2016, Nature Communications.

[100]  Ju Chu,et al.  Integration of microbial kinetics and fluid dynamics toward model‐driven scale‐up of industrial bioprocesses , 2015 .

[101]  F. Delvigne,et al.  Microbial heterogeneity affects bioprocess robustness: Dynamic single‐cell analysis contributes to understanding of microbial populations , 2014, Biotechnology journal.

[102]  Martin Ackermann,et al.  A functional perspective on phenotypic heterogeneity in microorganisms , 2015, Nature Reviews Microbiology.