A 21st Century Teaching and Learning Approach to Computer Science Education: Teacher Reactions

This paper describes a pilot study to evaluate its use for teacher Continuing Professional Development (CPD) in Computer Science (CS) using the Bridge21 model, a particular model of 21st century teaching and learning. A range of introductory Computer Science workshops are evaluated that include topics such as; Computational Thinking, Scratch, Raspberry Pi and Python. This paper includes a detailed look at the generalized activity model used in all Bridge21 activities. Combining the Kirkpatrick training evaluation theory with ethnographic methods the researchers analyzed qualitative and quantitative data gathered from 110 in-service teachers whom attended 9 CS CPD workshops. Using the Kirkpatrick framework as a taxonomy with which to code data relating to (a) teachers initial reactions towards the workshops and (b) intentions towards use of the Bridge21 model for supporting CS classroom delivery. Findings indicate that teachers’ initial reactions towards the programme were positive and that teachers intend to use the model in their classroom.

[1]  Brendan Tangney,et al.  Mathematics, Technology Interventions and Pedagogy - Seeing the Wood from the Trees , 2013, CSEDU.

[2]  G. Hein.  The Constructivist Museum , 1995 .

[3]  N. Denzin,et al.  The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research , 2005 .

[4]  Eva García,et al.  Learning outcomes using objectives with computer science students , 2014, ITiCSE '14.

[5]  Michael Rosen.  COMING TO TERMS WITH THE FIELD: UNDERSTANDING AND DOING ORGANIZATIONAL ETHNOGRAPHY* , 1991 .

[6]  J. R. Byrne,et al.  Computer science teacher reactions towards raspberry Pi Continuing Professional Development (CPD) workshops using the Bridge21 model , 2015, 2015 10th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE).

[7]  Brendan Tangney,et al.  21 Century Learning –Teachers’ and Students’ Experiences and Views of the Bridge21 Approach within Mainstream Education , 2013 .

[8]  Sue Sentance,et al.  Computer Science in Secondary Schools in the UK: Ways to Empower Teachers , 2013, ISSEP.

[9]  Elena Silva.  Measuring Skills for 21st-Century Learning , 2009 .

[10]  Brendan Tangney,et al.  Towards a Pragmatic Model for Group-Based, Technology-Mediated, Project-Oriented Learning – An Overview of the B2C Model , 2010 .

[11]  Jan Cuny,et al.  Transforming Computer Science Education in High Schools , 2011, Computer.

[12]  Christina Petersen,et al.  Strategies to Address Common Challenges When Teaching in an Active Learning Classroom , 2014 .

[13]  Tim Brown,et al.  Design Thinking for Social Innovation , 2010 .

[14]  NEIL C. C. BROWN,et al.  Restart: The Resurgence of Computer Science in UK Schools , 2014, TOCE.

[15]  Jason Alexander,et al.  Computer science unplugged: school students doing real computing without computers , 2009 .

[16]  Michael J. O'Grady,et al.  Practical Problem-Based Learning in Computing Education , 2012, TOCE.

[17]  Amanda M. Holland-Minkley,et al.  Teaching computer science through problems, not solutions , 2010, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[18]  Gordon Wells.  Dialogic Inquiry: A Social Constructivist Model of Learning and Teaching , 1999 .

[19]  Aman Yadav,et al.  Learning to teach computer science: the need for a methods course , 2012, CACM.

[20]  Margaret Kirkwood.  Infusing higher-order thinking and learning to learn into content instruction: A case study of secondary computing studies in Scotland , 2000 .

[21]  Leo Van Lier,et al.  Action-based Teaching, Autonomy and Identity , 2007 .

[22]  Rodger W. Bybee,et al.  Preparing the 21st century workforce: A new reform in science and technology education , 2006 .

[23]  Rhona Sharpe,et al.  Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age , 2007 .