A new non-linear framework for localization of acoustic sources

Source localization is the process of assigning spatial metadata to a set of unlabeled time of arrival for acoustic signals that may be interlaced with extreme outliers caused by detection and material-induced errors. Exploiting the fact that location error is attributed to high residuals, a new framework for non-linear source localization is proposed in this article. The detected time of arrival was employed to calculate the intermediate source and event time. The framework then quarantines sensors with high residual based on the intermediate event time and relative distance from the intermediate source. Then, the time of arrivals for quarantined sensors were reviewed and adjusted. Finally, with new arrival time, the framework iteratively optimizes the spatial location and event time, along with the updating of velocity field through a feedback loop. The new framework was used to localize acoustic emission sources with extreme outliers in an anisotropic medium. The results indicate that the proposed framework can accurately quarantine the bad sensor and localize sources with an accuracy better than existing source localization methods. Finally, the framework was employed to study the progressive damage in a steel fiber–reinforced beam under four-point bending. The source localization result is consistent with that from visual inspection of the member at failure.

[1]  T. W. Spencer,et al.  A new regional hypocenter location method , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[2]  Masayasu Ohtsu,et al.  Acoustic Emission Testing in Engineering - Basics and Applications , 2008 .

[3]  Surendra P. Shah,et al.  Nondestructive Techniques for Studying Fracture Processes in Concrete , 1999 .

[4]  Petr Sedlák,et al.  Acoustic emission localization in thin multi-layer plates using first-arrival determination , 2013 .

[5]  Xu Suchao MICROSEISM SOURCE LOCATION WITH HIERARCHICAL STRATEGY BASED ON PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION , 2009 .

[6]  Jianping An,et al.  Constrained Total Least-Squares Location Algorithm Using Time-Difference-of-Arrival Measurements , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[7]  C. Thurber Nonlinear earthquake location: Theory and examples , 1985 .

[8]  Moe Momayez,et al.  Wave separation: application for arrival time detection in ultrasonic signals. , 2015, Ultrasonics.

[9]  Xu Hongbin MICROSEISMIC SOURCES LOCATION METHODS BASED ON DIFFERENT INITIAL VALUES , 2010 .

[10]  Mao Chen Ge Analysis of Source Location Algorithms Part I: Overview and Non-Iterative Methods , 2003 .

[11]  Alan V. Oppenheim,et al.  Digital Signal Processing , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[12]  Hengchang Dai,et al.  Automatic picking of seismic arrivals in local earthquake data using an artificial neural network , 1995 .

[13]  Malcolm Sambridge,et al.  Earthquake hypocenter location using genetic algorithms , 1993, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[14]  Tomoki Shiotani,et al.  Effect of Inhomogeneity Parameters on Wave Propagation in Cementitious Material , 2008 .

[15]  Masayasu Ohtsu,et al.  Crack classification in concrete based on acoustic emission , 2010 .

[16]  Charlotte A. Rowe,et al.  Microseismic Swarm Activity in the New Madrid Seismic Zone , 2012 .

[17]  F. Waldhauser,et al.  A Double-Difference Earthquake Location Algorithm: Method and Application to the Northern Hayward Fault, California , 2000 .

[18]  Yifan Zhao,et al.  Comparison of alternatives to amplitude thresholding for onset detection of acoustic emission signals , 2017 .

[19]  Zhu Quan-jie Automated microseismic event arrival picking and multichannel recognition and location , 2013 .

[20]  Gong Fengqiang MATHEMATICAL FUNCTIONS AND PARAMETERS FOR MICROSEISMIC SOURCE LOCATION WITHOUT PRE-MEASURING SPEED , 2011 .

[21]  Alistair P. Rendell,et al.  Modeling nonlinear ultrasound propagation in heterogeneous media with power law absorption using a k-space pseudospectral method. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  GE MAOCHEN,et al.  ANALYSIS OF SOURCE LOCATION ALGORITHMS Part II: Iterative methods , 2022 .

[23]  Tian Yue,et al.  Review of Seismic Location Study , 2002 .

[24]  Zongjin Li,et al.  P-Wave Arrival Determination and AE Characterization of Concrete , 2000 .

[25]  Masayasu Ohtsu,et al.  Acoustic Emission Testing , 2006, Advanced Materials Research.

[26]  Das Avik Kumar,et al.  A new methodology for detecting the first arrival time of an acoustic wave , 2016 .

[27]  M. L. Wang,et al.  Sensing hardware and data collection methods for performance assessment , 2014 .

[28]  Bradley E. Treeby,et al.  Modelling elastic wave propagation using the k-Wave MATLAB Toolbox , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[29]  Markus G. R. SAUSE,et al.  Localization of Acoustic Emission Sources in Fiber Composites Using Artificial Neural Networks , 2014 .

[30]  Mao Chen Ge,et al.  Efficient mine microseismic monitoring , 2005 .

[31]  Edward G. Nawy,et al.  Concrete Construction Engineering Handbook , 2008 .

[32]  Tomoki Shiotani,et al.  Visualization of Damage in RC Bridge Deck for Bullet Trains with AE Tomography , 2015 .

[33]  Kristel C. Meza-Fajardo,et al.  On the stability of a non-convolutional perfectly matched layer for isotropic elastic media , 2010 .

[34]  Nan Li,et al.  A nonlinear microseismic source location method based on Simplex method and its residual analysis , 2014, Arabian Journal of Geosciences.

[35]  Malcolm Sambridge,et al.  Hypocentre location: genetic algorithms incorporating problem- specific information , 1994 .