Assessment of Heart Failure Patients’ Interest in Mobile Health Apps for Self-Care: Survey Study

Background Heart failure is a serious public health concern that afflicts millions of individuals in the United States. Development of behaviors that promote heart failure self-care may be imperative to reduce complications and avoid hospital re-admissions. Mobile health solutions, such as activity trackers and smartphone apps, could potentially help to promote self-care through remote tracking and issuing reminders. Objective The objective of this study was to ascertain heart failure patients’ interest in a smartphone app to assist them in managing their treatment and symptoms and to determine factors that influence their interest in such an app. Methods In the clinic waiting room on the day of their outpatient clinic appointments, 50 heart failure patients participated in a self-administered survey. The survey comprised 139 questions from previously published, institutional review board–approved questionnaires. The survey measured patients’ interest in and experience using technology as well as their function, heart failure symptoms, and heart failure self-care behaviors. The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) was among the 11 questionnaires and was used to measure the heart failure patients’ health-related quality of life through patient-reported outcomes. Results Participants were aged 64.5 years on average, 32% (16/50) of the participants were women, and 91% (41/45) of the participants were determined to be New York Heart Association Class II or higher. More than 60% (30/50) of the survey participants expressed interest in several potential features of a smartphone app designed for heart failure patients. Participant age correlated negatively with interest in tracking, tips, and reminders in multivariate regression analysis (P<.05). In contrast, MLHFQ scores (worse health status) produced positive correlations with these interests (P<.05). Conclusions The majority of heart failure patients showed interest in activity tracking, heart failure symptom management tips, and reminder features of a smartphone app. Desirable features and an understanding of factors that influence patient interest in a smartphone app for heart failure self-care may allow researchers to address common concerns and to develop apps that demonstrate the potential benefits of mobile technology.

[1]  William Speier,et al.  Evaluating utility and compliance in a patient-based eHealth study using continuous-time heart rate and activity trackers , 2018, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[2]  Francesca N. Delling,et al.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2018 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association , 2018, Circulation.

[3]  R. Gallagher,et al.  Harnessing the Potential of Wearable Activity Trackers for Heart Failure Self-Care , 2017, Current Heart Failure Reports.

[4]  Sarah Iribarren,et al.  Review and Analysis of Existing Mobile Phone Apps to Support Heart Failure Symptom Monitoring and Self-Care Management Using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) , 2016, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[5]  Eric J. Topol,et al.  The emerging field of mobile health , 2015, Science Translational Medicine.

[6]  Audie A Atienza,et al.  Mobile health technology evaluation: the mHealth evidence workshop. , 2013, American journal of preventive medicine.

[7]  I. Piña,et al.  Forecasting the Impact of Heart Failure in the United States: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association , 2013, Circulation. Heart failure.

[8]  Xuan Cai,et al.  Lifetime risk for heart failure among white and black Americans: cardiovascular lifetime risk pooling project. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  C. Forrest,et al.  Advances in Patient-Reported Outcomes: The NIH PROMIS® Measures , 2013, EGEMS.

[10]  Bradford W Hesse,et al.  Picking Up the Pace: Changes in Method and Frame for the Health Information National Trends Survey (2011–2014) , 2012, Journal of health communication.

[11]  Jia-Rong Wu,et al.  Linkages between anxiety and outcomes in heart failure. , 2011, Heart & lung : the journal of critical care.

[12]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Older adults talk technology: Technology usage and attitudes , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[13]  A. Ducharme,et al.  Identifying relative cut-off scores with neural networks for interpretation of the minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[14]  B. Riegel,et al.  An Update on the Self-care of Heart Failure Index , 2009, The Journal of cardiovascular nursing.

[15]  S. Normand,et al.  Patterns of Hospital Performance in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure 30-Day Mortality and Readmission , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[16]  R. Hays,et al.  Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items , 2009, Quality of Life Research.

[17]  Sharon-Lise T. Normand,et al.  An Administrative Claims Measure Suitable for Profiling Hospital Performance on the Basis of 30-Day All-Cause Readmission Rates Among Patients With Heart Failure , 2008, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[18]  Lorraine S. Evangelista,et al.  What Do We Know About Adherence and Self-care? , 2008, The Journal of cardiovascular nursing.

[19]  Joseph Sharit,et al.  Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[20]  D. Bouwhuis,et al.  Older adults' motivated choice for technological innovation: evidence for benefit-driven selectivity. , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[21]  J. Spertus,et al.  Health Status Predicts Long-Term Outcome in Outpatients With Coronary Disease , 2002, Circulation.

[22]  Kristen Sethares,et al.  The Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire: Sensitivity to Differences and Responsiveness to Intervention Intensity in a Clinical Population , 2002, Nursing research.

[23]  W. Rogers,et al.  The Use of Communication Technologies by Older Adults: Exploring the Benefits from the User's Perspective , 2001 .

[24]  R. Coronel,et al.  Defining heart failure. , 2001, Cardiovascular research.

[25]  J. Spertus,et al.  Development and evaluation of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire: a new health status measure for heart failure. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  A Hofman,et al.  Prevalence of heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction in the general population; The Rotterdam Study. , 1999, European heart journal.

[27]  R. Downey,et al.  Missing data in Likert ratings: A comparison of replacement methods. , 1998, The Journal of general psychology.

[28]  Curreri Pw The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. , 1998, Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons.

[29]  Y Wang,et al.  Readmission after hospitalization for congestive heart failure among Medicare beneficiaries. , 1997, Archives of internal medicine.

[30]  D. Levy,et al.  The epidemiology of heart failure: the Framingham Study. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[31]  William T. Abraham,et al.  Focused Update : ACCF / AHA Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure in Adults , 2013 .

[32]  G. Fonarow,et al.  Epidemiology and risk profile of heart failure , 2011, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[33]  R. M. Harvey,et al.  Nomenclature and criteria for diagnosis of diseases of the heart and great vessels , 1973 .