Response of monkey glabrous skin mechanoreceptors to random noise sequences: II. Dynamic stimulus state analysis.

The responses of monkey glabrous skin slowly adapting (SAI, Merkel cell), rapidly adapting (RA, Meissner) and Pacinian corpuscle (PC) mechanoreceptors were analyzed as a function of the instantaneous position, velocity, and acceleration of a dynamic stimulus. For these experiments, a vibrotactile punctate stimulator was driven by a non-repeating-noise sequence. The resulting data (sampled stimulus waveform, windowed impulse) were processed in several ways. Initially, input-output correlation analysis was implemented to generate spike-aligned averages of the stimulus waveform preceding and following impulse initiation. From this analysis, it was determined that dual-responding RA and PC afferents--that is, those afferents that responded to both indenting and extracting stimulus movements--universally responded in a nearly perfectly symmetrical manner to the stimulus. Subsequently, two-dimensional (position, velocity) state histograms were generated and used to assess mechanoreceptor dynamic stimulus sensitivities. From these state histograms, it was determined that the threshold for impulse initiation by SAI afferents was preferentially sensitive to the indentation position of the stimulus, with only a minor sensitivity to stimulus velocity. RA afferent thresholds were sensitive to a continuum of dynamic stimulus velocities and positions. At the extremes, RA afferent impulses could be initiated by either a highly indented, low-velocity stimulus or high-velocity stimulus with a limited indentation position. PC afferents appeared to be preferentially sensitive to a combination of stimulus velocity and acceleration, but the data-sampling interval was too coarse to adequately resolve the full range of dynamic stimulus sensitivities.

[1]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  The sense of flutter-vibration: comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  H. Querfurth Encoder response of isolated frog muscle spindle elicited by pseudorandom noise stimuli. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  M. Knibestöl Stimulus‐response functions of slowly adapting mechanoreceptors in the human glabrous skin area. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  M. Knibestöl Stimulus—response functions of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors in the human glabrous skin area , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  On- versus off-responses of raccoon glabrous skin rapidly adapting cutaneous mechanoreceptors. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  A. Iggo,et al.  Sensory receptors in the skin of mammals and their sensory functions. , 1985, Revue neurologique.

[7]  Transducer action of isolated frog muscle spindle evoked by pseudorandom noise stimuli. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  W. Davis,et al.  Command interneurons controlling swimmeret movements in the lobster. I. Types of effects on motoneurons. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Tactile discrimination of shape: responses of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptive afferents to a step stroked across the monkey fingerpad , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  M. Rowe,et al.  Vibrotactile sensitivity of slowly adapting type I sensory fibres associated with touch domes in cat hairy skin. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  F. Looft Response of monkey glabrous skin mechanoreceptors to random-noise sequences: I. Temporal response characteristics. , 1994, Somatosensory & motor research.

[12]  R. Johansson,et al.  Responses of mechanoreceptive afferent units in the glabrous skin of the human hand to sinusoidal skin displacements , 1982, Brain Research.

[13]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  Capacities of humans and monkeys to discriminate vibratory stimuli of different frequency and amplitude: a correlation between neural events and psychological measurements. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Jozef J. Zwislocki,et al.  Intensity and frequency characteristics of pacinian corpuscles. II: Receptor potentials , 1984 .

[15]  Vasilis Z. Marmarelis,et al.  Advanced Methods of Physiological System Modeling , 1989 .

[16]  Kenneth O. Johnson,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Tactual form and Texture Perception , 1992 .

[17]  A. Freeman,et al.  Cutaneous mechanoreceptors in macaque monkey: temporal discharge patterns evoked by vibration, and a receptor model , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  J. Bell,et al.  The structure and function of pacinian corpuscles: A review , 1994, Progress in Neurobiology.

[19]  A. Freeman,et al.  A model accounting for effects of vibratory amplitude on responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in macaque monkey , 1982, The Journal of physiology.