Accessibility of ATMS for the functionally illiterate through icon-based interfaces

This study looks at the preliminary development and evaluation of an icon-based ATM interface for use with functionally illiterate bank account holders. In the first part of the study functionally illiterate bank account holders were closely involved in the development of an icon set for the entire ATM withdrawal transaction. This involved target subjects providing descriptive information on possible icons and then evaluating these descriptions using an icon identification test. Although only seven of the 15 icons met the ISO criterion of 67% correct identification, the ‘best’ icons for each instruction were evaluated using one of three prototype interfaces – icon-only, text-only and text-and-icon interface. Comparisons were made between these three interfaces, and a functionally illiterate group and a comparison literate group. Results suggested that within each group there were few significant differences based on the type of interface, although there were significant differences between the groups. Significant differences in the literate group were primarily due to prior exposure to similar ATM interfaces, whereas significant differences in the illiterate group were primarily due to icon comprehensibility.

[1]  Alan Lewis,et al.  Customer Reactions to Automated Teller Machines (ATMs): A Field Study in a UK Building Society , 1992 .

[2]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Graphical user interfaces and ease of use: some myths examined , 1994, SIGCPR '94.

[3]  Rungtai Lin Cultural Differences in Icon Recognition , 1999, HCI.

[4]  Michael S. Wogalter,et al.  Comprehension of Pictorial Symbols: Effects of Context and Test Method , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[5]  Paul Muter,et al.  The role of graphics in item selection from menus , 1986 .

[6]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  A Survey of Automatic Teller Machine Usage across the Adult Life Span , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[7]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[8]  Andrew F. Monk User-Centred Design , 2000 .

[9]  David Gittins,et al.  Icon-Based Human-Computer Interaction , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[10]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of Interface Design Alternatives: Icon vs. Text and Direct Manipulation vs. Menus , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[11]  Jan Gulliksen,et al.  The software accessibility of human-computer interfaces—ISO Technical Specification 16071 , 2003, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[12]  Krystyna Chlebowska,et al.  Literacy for Rural Women in the Third World , 1990 .

[13]  Anthony I. Wasserman,et al.  Extending State Transition Diagrams for the Specification of Human–Computer Interaction , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[14]  W. Rogers,et al.  An analysis of automatic teller machine usage by older adults: a structured interview approach. , 1997, Applied Ergonomics.

[15]  Nigel Bevan,et al.  International standards for HCI and usability , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[16]  Peter N. Rule The time is burning: The right of adults to basic education in South Africa , 2006 .

[17]  Martin C. Maguire A review of human factors guidelines and techniques for the design of graphical human-computer interfaces , 1985, Comput. Graph..

[18]  Michael D. Byrne,et al.  Using icons to find documents: simplicity is critical , 1993, INTERCHI.

[19]  D. C. Howell Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[20]  R. Dowse,et al.  The development and evaluation of pharmaceutical pictograms , 1998 .

[21]  D Felix,et al.  What makes an automated teller machine usable by blind users? , 1998, Ergonomics.

[22]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[23]  Margaret Harris,et al.  Language processing in children and adults: An introduction , 1986 .

[24]  Meera Blattner,et al.  Earcons and Icons: Their Structure and Common Design Principles , 1989, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[25]  William T. Wood,et al.  Icons in Everyday Life , 1987, HCI.

[26]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  From public technology to ubiquitous computing: implications for ergonomics , 1998 .

[27]  Susan Wiedenbeck,et al.  The use of icons and labels in an end user application program: An empirical study of learning and retention , 1999, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[28]  Peter Hannon,et al.  Literacy, Home and School: Research And Practice In Teaching Literacy With Parents , 1994 .

[29]  Stephen J. Guastello,et al.  Verbal versus Pictorial Representations of Objects in a Human-Computer Interface , 1989, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[30]  Andrew Thatcher,et al.  Attitudes of semi-literate and literate bank account holders to the use of automatic teller machines (ATMs) , 2005 .

[31]  Ronald M. Baecker,et al.  Readings in human-computer interaction : a multidisciplinary approach , 1988 .

[32]  Sven Blankenberger,et al.  Effects of Icon Design on Human-Computer Interaction , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[33]  John Abeysekera,et al.  Understanding small graphical symbols: a cross-cultural study , 2001 .

[34]  Elizabeth Boling,et al.  Relative Perceptibility of Hypercard Buttons Using Pictorial Symbols and Text Labels , 1996 .

[35]  Chris Baber,et al.  Speech technology for automatic teller machines: an investigation of user attitude and performance , 1998 .

[36]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Icons at the Interface: Their Usefulness , 1989, Interact. Comput..

[37]  Other Human Development Report 2004: cultural liberty in today's diverse world , 2004 .

[38]  Awad B. El‐Haddad,et al.  ATM Banking Behaviour in Kuwait: A Consumer Survey , 1992 .

[39]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Design of Icons for Use by Chinese in Mainland China , 1998, Interact. Comput..

[40]  Martin B. Curry,et al.  Measuring symbol and icon characteristics: Norms for concreteness, complexity, meaningfulness, familiarity, and semantic distance for 239 symbols , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[41]  A S Adams,et al.  Automatic teller machines and the older population. , 1991, Applied ergonomics.