COHESIVE ELEMENT MODELING OF VISCOELASTIC FRACTURE: APPLICATION TO PEEL TESTING OF POLYMERS

A computational modeling technique for fracture propagation in viscoelastic materials using cohesive elements for the zone ahead of the crack tip is presented. The computational technique is used to study the problem of increase in fracture energy with peel velocity in peel testing of polymers. A rate-independent phenomenological cohesive zone model is used to model the intrinsic fracture toughness of the interface between the polymer sheets. A dimensional analysis reveals that the macroscopic fracture energy scales with the intrinsic fracture toughness and is a function of peel velocity, and parameters such as the thickness, bulk properties of the polymer sheets, and other cohesive zone properties. The growth of fracture energy as a function of the peel velocity has been studied for polymer sheets characterized by a standard linear viscoelastic solid. Viscoelastic losses in the peel arm vanish in the limits of very slow and rapid peeling. Peak dissipation is obtained at an intermediate velocity, which is related to the characteristic relaxation time and thickness. This behavior is interpreted in terms of the size of elastic and viscous zones near the crack tip. It is found that the total energy dissipated is dependent upon both the intrinsic fracture toughness and the characteristic opening displacement of the cohesive zone model. The computational framework has been used to model experimental data on peeling of Butadiene rubbers. It is found that the usual interpretation of these data, that the macroscopic dissipation equals the rate-independent intrinsic toughness multiplied by a factor that depends on rate of loading, leads to a large quantitative discrepancy between theory and experiment. It is proposed that a model based on a rate-dependent cohesive law be used to model these peel tests.

[1]  P. Gennes,et al.  Soft Interfaces: The 1994 Dirac Memorial Lecture , 1996 .

[2]  A. Gent,et al.  Adhesion of viscoelastic materials to rigid substrates , 1969, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[3]  A. Gent.  Adhesion and Strength of Viscoelastic Solids. Is There a Relationship between Adhesion and Bulk Properties , 1996 .

[4]  E. Kramer,et al.  Interface fracture and viscoelastic deformation in finite size specimens , 1992 .

[5]  J. Field.  Fracture of Solids , 1964 .

[6]  A. Gent,et al.  Peel mechanics for an elastic‐plastic adherend , 1977 .

[7]  Richard Schapery,et al.  A theory of crack initiation and growth in viscoelastic media , 1975 .

[8]  A. Carpinteri.  Size-scale transition from ductile to brittle failure : structural response vs. crack growth resistance curve , 1991 .

[9]  A. Gent,et al.  Effect of interfacial bonding on the strength of adhesion , 1975 .

[10]  A. Needleman.  An analysis of decohesion along an imperfect interface , 1990 .

[11]  M. Xie,et al.  FEM Modeling of Fictitious Crack Propagation in Concrete , 1992 .

[12]  John R. Rice,et al.  Fracture of Brittle Solids (Cambridge Solid State Science Series) , 1975 .

[13]  A. Carpinteri,et al.  Mixed mode fracture of concrete , 1991 .

[14]  R. Jaffee,et al.  Deformation and fracture of high polymers. , 1973, Science.

[15]  G. I. Barenblatt.  THE MATHEMATICAL THEORY OF EQUILIBRIUM CRACKS IN BRITTLE FRACTURE , 1962 .

[16]  M. Ortiz,et al.  Computational modelling of impact damage in brittle materials , 1996 .

[17]  J. Ferry.  Viscoelastic properties of polymers , 1961 .

[18]  Kyung-Suk Kim,et al.  On the mechanics of adhesion testing of flexible films , 1989 .

[19]  D. S. Dugdale.  Yielding of steel sheets containing slits , 1960 .

[20]  W. G. Knauss,et al.  On the Steady Propagation of a Crack in a Viscoelastic Sheet: Experiments and Analysis , 1973 .

[21]  Xiaopeng Xu,et al.  Numerical simulations of fast crack growth in brittle solids , 1994 .

[22]  Nikolaos Aravas,et al.  Elastoplastic analysis of the peel test , 1988 .

[23]  A. Thomas,et al.  The strength of highly elastic materials , 1967, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[24]  W. Knauss.  Time Dependent Fracture and Cohesive Zones , 1993 .

[25]  N. Aravas,et al.  The Effects of Viscoelasticity in the Peeling of Polymeric Films , 1991 .

[26]  Z. Bažant,et al.  Fracture and Size Effect in Concrete and Other Quasibrittle Materials , 1997 .

[27]  E. H. Andrews,et al.  Mechanics of adhesive failure. II , 1973, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[28]  R. Ogden.  Non-Linear Elastic Deformations , 1984 .

[29]  Wolfgang G. Knauss,et al.  Crack Propagation in a Nonlinearly Viscoelastic Solid With Relevance to Adhesive Bond Failure , 1993 .

[30]  J. Williams,et al.  The peeling of flexible laminates , 1994 .

[31]  E. Kramer,et al.  A fracture model for a weak interface in a viscoelastic material (small scale yielding analysis) , 1992 .

[32]  K. Kendall.  The Shapes of Peeling Solid Films , 1973 .

[33]  A. Gent,et al.  Interfacial bonding, energy dissipation, and adhesion , 1994 .

[34]  P. Tordjeman,et al.  Relationship between viscoelastic and peeling properties of model adhesives. Part 1. Cohesive fracture , 1997 .

[35]  J. Hutchinson,et al.  The relation between crack growth resistance and fracture process parameters in elastic-plastic solids , 1992 .

[36]  A. Gent,et al.  Effect of interfacial bonding on the strength of adhesion of elastomers. I. Self‐adhesion , 1981 .

[37]  Silvio Valente,et al.  Tensile and flexural creep rupture tests on partially-damaged concrete specimens , 1997 .