A Randomized and Controlled Crossover Study Investigating the Improvement of Walking and Posture Functions in Chronic Stroke Patients Using HAL Exoskeleton – The HALESTRO Study (HAL-Exoskeleton STROke Study)

Background: The exoskeleton HAL (hybrid assistive limb) has proven to improve walking functions in spinal cord injury and chronic stroke patients when using it for body-weight supported treadmill training (BWSTT). Compared with other robotic devices, it offers the possibility to initiate movements actively. Previous studies on stroke patients did not compare HAL-BWSTT with conventional physiotherapy (CPT). Therefore, we performed a crossover clinical trial comparing CPT and HAL-BWSTT in chronic stroke patients with hemiparesis, the HALESTRO study. Our hypothesis was that HAL-training would have greater effects on walking and posture functions compared to a mixed-approach CPT. Methods: A total of 18 chronic stroke patients participated in this study. Treatment consisted of 30 CPT sessions and of 30 sessions of BWSTT with a double leg type HAL exoskeleton successively in a randomized, crossover study design. Primary outcome parameters were walking time and speed in 10-meter walk test (10MWT), time in timed-up-and-go test (TUG) and distance in 6-min walk test (6MWT). Secondary outcome parameters were the functional ambulatory categories (FAC) and the Berg-Balance Scale (BBS). Data were assessed at baseline, at crossover and at the end of the study, all without using and wearing HAL. Results: Our study demonstrate neither a significant difference in walking parameters nor in functional and balance parameters. When HAL-BWSTT was applied to naïve patients, it led to an improvement in walking parameters and in balance abilities. Pooling all data, we could show a significant effect in 10MWT, 6MWT, FAC and BBS, both therapies sequentially applied over 12 weeks. Thereby, FAC improve from dependent to independent category (3 to 4). One patient dropped out of the study due to intensive fatigue after each training session. Conclusion: HAL-BWSTT and mixed-approach CPT were effective therapies in chronic stroke patients. However, compared with CPT, HAL training with 30 sessions over 6 weeks was not more effective. The combination of both therapies led to an improvement of walking and balance functions. Robotic rehabilitation of walking disorders alone still lacks the proof of superiority in chronic stroke. Robotic treatment therapies and classical CPT rehabilitation concepts should be applied in an individualized therapy program.

[1]  K. M. Gill,et al.  Gait assessment for neurologically impaired patients. Standards for outcome assessment. , 1986, Physical therapy.

[2]  R. Dickstein,et al.  Stroke rehabilitation. Three exercise therapy approaches. , 1986, Physical therapy.

[3]  K. M. Gill,et al.  Gait Assessment for Neurologically Impaired Patients , 1986 .

[4]  Diane Podsiadlo,et al.  The Timed “Up & Go”: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly Persons , 1991, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[5]  P J Holliday,et al.  Clinical and laboratory measures of postural balance in an elderly population. , 1992, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  Pamela W. Duncan,et al.  Similar Motor Recovery of Upper and Lower Extremities After Stroke , 1994, Stroke.

[7]  T. Olsen,et al.  Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  Richard W. Bohannon Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20-79 years: reference values and determinants. , 1997, Age and ageing.

[9]  N B Lincoln,et al.  Randomized, controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke. , 1999, Stroke.

[10]  A. Stewart,et al.  Mobility-related function in older adults: assessment with a 6-minute walk test. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  Barry Manilow,et al.  Forecasting the Future , 2019, July/Aug 2010.

[12]  G. Kraft Motor recovery after stroke , 2003 .

[13]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. , 2004, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[14]  Kim Brock,et al.  Outcomes of the Bobath concept on upper limb recovery following stroke , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[15]  J. Cummings,et al.  The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A Brief Screening Tool For Mild Cognitive Impairment , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[16]  Ray-Yau Wang,et al.  Efficacy of Bobath versus orthopaedic approach on impairment and function at different motor recovery stages after stroke: a randomized controlled study , 2005, Clinical rehabilitation.

[17]  I. Tarkka,et al.  The effectiveness of body weight-supported gait training and floor walking in patients with chronic stroke. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  E. Dooley National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke , 2006 .

[19]  S. Black,et al.  National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke–Canadian Stroke Network Vascular Cognitive Impairment Harmonization Standards , 2006, Stroke.

[20]  Alice C. Harris,et al.  What is Reproducibility , 2006 .

[21]  S. Studenski,et al.  Meaningful Change and Responsiveness in Common Physical Performance Measures in Older Adults , 2006, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[22]  C. Mathers,et al.  Stroke incidence and prevalence in Europe: a review of available data , 2006, European journal of neurology.

[23]  Peter Langhorne,et al.  Physiotherapy treatment approaches for the recovery of postural control and lower limb function following stroke: a systematic review , 2007, Clinical rehabilitation.

[24]  A. Mayr,et al.  Prospective, Blinded, Randomized Crossover Study of Gait Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Using the Lokomat Gait Orthosis , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[25]  J. Mehrholz,et al.  Predictive validity and responsiveness of the functional ambulation category in hemiparetic patients after stroke. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[26]  F. Müller,et al.  Effects of Locomotion Training With Assistance of a Robot-Driven Gait Orthosis in Hemiparetic Patients After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study , 2007, Stroke.

[27]  George Howard,et al.  Sex differences in stroke: epidemiology, clinical presentation, medical care, and outcomes , 2008, The Lancet Neurology.

[28]  M. Budoff,et al.  National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke , 2008 .

[29]  Yoshiyuki Sankai,et al.  Development of single leg version of HAL for hemiplegia , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[30]  Vicky Chan,et al.  Do robotic and non-robotic arm movement training drive motor recovery after stroke by a common neural mechanism? experimental evidence and a computational model , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[31]  Vincent S. Huang,et al.  Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[32]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review , 2009, The Lancet Neurology.

[33]  Grant D. Huang,et al.  Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[34]  S. Sonoda,et al.  Preliminary Trial to Increase Gait Velocity with High Speed Treadmill Training for Patients with Hemiplegia , 2010, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[35]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Stroke rehabilitation , 2011, The Lancet.

[36]  Bruce H Dobkin,et al.  Body-weight-supported treadmill rehabilitation after stroke. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[37]  C. Brogårdh,et al.  The Reproducibility of Berg Balance Scale and the Single‐Leg Stance in Chronic Stroke and the Relationship Between the Two Tests , 2012, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[38]  J. Mehrholz,et al.  Electromechanical-assisted gait training after stroke: a systematic review comparing end-effector and exoskeleton devices. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[39]  Maria Blettner,et al.  On the proper use of the crossover design in clinical trials: part 18 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. , 2012, Deutsches Arzteblatt international.

[40]  Yoshiyuki Sankai,et al.  Pilot study of locomotion improvement using hybrid assistive limb in chronic stroke patients , 2013, BMC Neurology.

[41]  Randall T Higashida,et al.  Forecasting the Future of Stroke in the United States: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association , 2013, Stroke.

[42]  Won Hyuk Chang,et al.  Robot-assisted Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation , 2013, Journal of stroke.

[43]  Martin Tegenthoff,et al.  Locomotion training using voluntary driven exoskeleton (HAL) in acute incomplete SCI , 2014, Neurology.

[44]  P. Schwenkreis,et al.  Voluntary driven exoskeleton as a new tool for rehabilitation in chronic spinal cord injury: a pilot study. , 2014, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[45]  Hideyuki Saitou,et al.  Locomotion improvement using a hybrid assistive limb in recovery phase stroke patients: a randomized controlled pilot study. , 2014, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[46]  J. Borg,et al.  Gait training early after stroke with a new exoskeleton – the hybrid assistive limb: a study of safety and feasibility , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[47]  Yoshiyuki Sankai,et al.  Development of an assist controller with robot suit HAL for hemiplegic patients using motion data on the unaffected side , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[48]  Eyal Shahar,et al.  Stroke incidence and mortality trends in US communities, 1987 to 2011. , 2014, JAMA.

[49]  R. Camicioli,et al.  Serial Montreal Cognitive Assessments Demonstrate Reversible Cognitive Impairment in Patients With Acute Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke , 2014, Stroke.

[50]  Romain Meeusen,et al.  Does Robot-Assisted Gait Rehabilitation Improve Balance in Stroke Patients? A Systematic Review , 2014, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[51]  T. Yoshimoto,et al.  Feasibility and efficacy of high-speed gait training with a voluntary driven exoskeleton robot for gait and balance dysfunction in patients with chronic stroke: nonrandomized pilot study with concurrent control , 2015, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[52]  Atte Meretoja,et al.  Update on the Global Burden of Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke in 1990-2013: The GBD 2013 Study , 2015, Neuroepidemiology.

[53]  Martin Tegenthoff,et al.  HAL® exoskeleton training improves walking parameters and normalizes cortical excitability in primary somatosensory cortex in spinal cord injury patients , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[54]  Mark D. Huffman,et al.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association , 2016, Circulation.

[55]  T. Yoshimoto,et al.  Sustained effects of once-a-week gait training with hybrid assistive limb for rehabilitation in chronic stroke: case study , 2016, Journal of physical therapy science.

[56]  Christine Nadel,et al.  A Motor Relearning Programme For Stroke , 2016 .

[57]  J. Mehrholz,et al.  Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[58]  Martin Tegenthoff,et al.  Functional Outcome of Neurologic-Controlled HAL-Exoskeletal Neurorehabilitation in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot With One Year Treatment and Variable Treatment Frequency , 2017, Global spine journal.

[59]  Mirko Aach,et al.  Against the odds: what to expect in rehabilitation of chronic spinal cord injury with a neurologically controlled Hybrid Assistive Limb exoskeleton. A subgroup analysis of 55 patients according to age and lesion level. , 2017, Neurosurgical focus.

[60]  J. Mehrholz,et al.  Electromechanical-Assisted Training for Walking After Stroke: A Major Update of the Evidence , 2017, Stroke.

[61]  A. Matsumura,et al.  Effects of gait training using the Hybrid Assistive Limb® in recovery-phase stroke patients: A 2-month follow-up, randomized, controlled study. , 2017, NeuroRehabilitation.

[62]  Yoshiyuki Sankai,et al.  Gait training of subacute stroke patients using a hybrid assistive limb: a pilot study , 2017, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[63]  Wei Lu,et al.  Associative Memory Extinction Is Accompanied by Decayed Plasticity at Motor Cortical Neurons and Persistent Plasticity at Sensory Cortical Neurons , 2017, Front. Cell. Neurosci..

[64]  Yukio Tsuchida,et al.  Factors Leading to Improved Gait Function in Patients with Subacute or Chronic Central Nervous System Impairments Who Receive Functional Training with the Robot Suit Hybrid Assistive Limb , 2017, Neurologia medico-chirurgica.

[65]  Diane Podsiadlo,et al.  Timed "Up & Go" Test , 2019 .

[66]  A Consecutive 25-Week Program of Gait Training, Using the Alternating Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL®) Robot and Conventional Training, and its Effects on the Walking Ability of a Patient with Chronic Thoracic Spinal Cord Injury: A Single Case Reversal Design , 2019, Medicina.

[67]  José Luis Pons Rovira,et al.  HYBRID: Ambulatory Robotic Gait Trainer with Movement Induction and Partial Weight Support , 2019, Sensors.