Knowledge Management Audit - a methodology and case study

The strategic importance of knowledge in today’s organisation has been discussed extensively and research has looked at various issues in developing knowledge management systems. Both the characterisation of knowledge and alternate models for understanding the acquisition and use of such knowledge have taken on significant prominence. This is due to the complexities associated with acquiring and representing knowledge, and the varied nature of its use in knowledge work. However, the role of the knowledge workers and the processes that guide their knowledge work as they meet the knowledge goals of an organisation have received little attention. This paper proposes a knowledge audit (an assessment of the way knowledge processes meet an organisation’s knowledge goals) methodology to understand the “gaps” in the needs of a knowledge worker before one develops KM systems. The methodology also uses “process change” research to help build a socio-technical environment critical for knowledge work. The audit methodology is applied to a particular case and the implementation of the audit recommendations is discussed. Future implications of such an audit are also discussed.

[1]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[2]  M. Polanyi,et al.  Personal Knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy , 1959 .

[3]  David T. Croasdell It's Role in Organizational Memory and Learning , 2001, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[4]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Formal validation of a knowledge-based system using a variation of the Turing test , 1993 .

[5]  D. L. Flarey Reengineering the Corporation , 1994 .

[6]  T. Davenport,et al.  Improving Knowledge Work Processes , 1996 .

[7]  Mark M. Klein,et al.  REENGINEERING METHODOLOGIES AND TOOLS A Prescription for Enhancing Success , 1994 .

[8]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[9]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Knowing "What" to Do Is Not Enough: Turning Knowledge into Action , 1999 .

[10]  S. Lippman,et al.  Uncertain Imitability: An Analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency under Competition , 1982 .

[11]  J. Brown,et al.  Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing , 1999, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[12]  Gilbert Probst,et al.  Managing Knowledge: Building Blocks for Success , 1999 .

[13]  Mark S. Ackerman Definitional and contextual issues in organizational and group memories , 1994, Inf. Technol. People.

[14]  Cynthia A. Montgomery,et al.  Resource-Based and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm: Towards A Synthesis , 2012 .

[15]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  Business Process Change: A Study of Methodologies, Techniques, and Tools , 1997, MIS Q..

[16]  Harold Jack Leavitt Managerial Psychology: An Introduction to Individuals, Pairs, and Groups in Organizations , 1972 .

[17]  Liam Fahey,et al.  The Eleven Deadliest Sins of Knowledge Management , 1998 .

[18]  P. Drucker,et al.  The age discontinuity. , 1979, Population bulletin.

[19]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[20]  M. Polanyi Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[21]  Michael P. Kelly Personal Knowledge: Toward a Post-Critical Philosophy , 1963 .

[22]  C. P. Goodman,et al.  The Tacit Dimension , 2003 .

[23]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  What's your strategy for managing knowledge? , 1999, Harvard business review.

[24]  J. Spender Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm , 1996 .

[25]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[26]  Sidney G. Winter,et al.  FOUR Rs OF PROFITABILITY: RENTS, RESOURCES, ROUTINES, AND REPLICATION , 1995 .