STARS: the implementation of a Computer-Aided Employee Suggestion Management System to operationalize a continuous improvement process

Organizations are looking for ways to sustain incremental improvements. For this end, we developed a Computer-Aided Employee Suggestion Management System (CAESMS) called STARS. The need was to make the problem visible and support employees in their efforts to reduce waste and increase employee satisfaction. Because human interaction with technology in the context of work can be very challenging, an introduction process called “1,2,3 STARS” was designed to set up STARS smoothly and support the transition. The proposed solution was tested in three working conditions to assess its relevance and limitations. Each test lasted 16 weeks. Indicators from these tests were compared to a reference study based on a non-technological experimentation based on a similar problem-solving methodology (Restrepo et al. in Int J Health Care Qual Assur 29(3):253–266. doi:10.1108/IJHCQA-02-2015-0022, 2016). The introduction of STARS technology provided relevant qualitative and quantitative results: (1) the cycle time for closing actions was reduced by 19.04% compared to the earlier study; (2) the number of actions in progress at the same time was also reduced by 49.82% from the earlier study; and (3) the leadership routine substantially increases the chances of introducing CAESMS on a long-term basis.

[1]  William E. Spangler,et al.  Motivating creativity through a computer-mediated employee suggestion management system , 2003, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[2]  Keeping the "continuous" in continuous quality improvement: exploring perceived outcomes of CQI program use in community pharmacy. , 2014, Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP.

[3]  Mohammed Arif,et al.  The determinants for sustainability of an employee suggestion system , 2015 .

[4]  C. Slovis,et al.  Kaizen: a method of process improvement in the emergency department. , 2009, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[5]  Mohamed Zairi,et al.  Business process management: a boundaryless approach to modern competitiveness , 1997, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[6]  Glenn Parry,et al.  Application of lean visual process management tools , 2006 .

[7]  John Øvretveit Producing useful research about quality improvement. , 2002, International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services.

[8]  J. Antony,et al.  Six sigma in small‐ and medium‐sized UK manufacturing enterprises: Some empirical observations , 2005 .

[9]  A. F. Salam,et al.  An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[10]  Graham C. Low,et al.  ERP innovation implementation model incorporating change management , 2008, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[11]  J. Fairbank,et al.  Motivating Creativity and Enhancing Innovation through Employee Suggestion System Technology , 2001 .

[12]  Phillip Marksberry,et al.  Problem solving for managers: a mathematical investigation of Toyota's 8‐step process , 2011 .

[13]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[14]  Patrick M. Lencioni,et al.  The Five Dysfunctions of a Team: A Leadership Fable , 2002 .

[15]  M. D. Christou,et al.  Human factors data traceability and analysis in the European Community’s Major Accident Reporting System , 2009, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[16]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to assess automation , 2011, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[17]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Crowdsourcing: How to Benefit from (Too) Many Great Ideas , 2013, MIS Q. Executive.

[18]  Alan Jackson,et al.  The hard side of change management , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[19]  Rajiv Kishore,et al.  Rules of Crowdsourcing: Models, Issues, and Systems of Control , 2013, Inf. Syst. Manag..