Four‐dimensional flow‐sensitive MRI of the thoracic aorta: 12‐ versus 32‐channel coil arrays

To evaluate the performance of four‐dimensional (4D) flow‐sensitive MRI in the thoracic aorta using 12‐ and 32‐channel coils and parallel imaging.

[1]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  k‐t BLAST and k‐t SENSE: Dynamic MRI with high frame rate exploiting spatiotemporal correlations , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Murat Aksoy,et al.  Time‐resolved 3D quantitative flow MRI of the major intracranial vessels: Initial experience and comparative evaluation at 1.5T and 3.0T in combination with parallel imaging , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Christina Triantafyllou,et al.  A 128‐channel receive‐only cardiac coil for highly accelerated cardiac MRI at 3 Tesla , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  G. Emanuel,et al.  Analytical fluid dynamics , 1993 .

[6]  D N Firmin,et al.  Magnetic resonance velocity vector mapping of blood flow in thoracic aortic aneurysms and grafts. , 1995, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[7]  J. Hennig,et al.  Time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography and flow-sensitive 4-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla for blood flow and wall shear stress analysis. , 2008, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[8]  J. Fleiss Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. , 1971 .

[9]  M H Buonocore Algorithms for improving calculated streamlines in 3‐D phase contrast angiography , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Practical approaches to the evaluation of signal‐to‐noise ratio performance with parallel imaging: Application with cardiac imaging and a 32‐channel cardiac coil , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Alfio Quarteroni,et al.  Computational vascular fluid dynamics: problems, models and methods , 2000 .

[12]  Patrick A Turski,et al.  Improved 3D phase contrast MRI with off‐resonance corrected dual echo VIPR , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  J. Hennig,et al.  Time‐resolved 3D MR velocity mapping at 3T: Improved navigator‐gated assessment of vascular anatomy and blood flow , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  Richard Frayne,et al.  Visualizing three‐dimensional flow with simulated streamlines and three‐dimensional phase‐contrast MR imaging , 1992, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  J. Hennig,et al.  4D phase contrast MRI at 3 T: Effect of standard and blood‐pool contrast agents on SNR, PC‐MRA, and blood flow visualization , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  Adrian T. Lee,et al.  Three‐Point Phase‐Contrast Velocity Measurements with Increased Velocity‐to‐Noise Ratio , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  N J Pelc,et al.  Concomitant gradient terms in phase contrast MR: Analysis and correction , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  David Saloner,et al.  Clinical evaluation of aortic coarctation with 4D flow MR imaging , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  J. Hennig,et al.  Quantitative 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI: Optimized analysis of blood flow and vessel wall parameters , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Jürgen Hennig,et al.  Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Open Access Multidirectional Flow Analysis by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Aneurysm Development following Repair of Aortic Coarctation , 2008 .

[21]  N J Pelc,et al.  Noise reduction in three‐dimensional phase‐contrast MR velocity measurementsl , 1993, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.