Information Needs of Art Museum Visitors: Real and Virtual

Museums and libraries are considered large repositories of human knowledge and human culture. They have similar missions and goals in distributing accumulated knowledge to society. Current digitization projects allow both, museums and libraries to reach a broader audience, share their resources with a variety of users. While studies of information seeking behavior, retrieval systems and metadata in library science have a long history; such research studies in museum environments are at their early experimental stage. There are few studies concerning information seeking behavior and needs of virtual museum visitors, especially with the use of images in the museums' collections available on the Web. The current study identifies preferences of a variety of user groups about the information specifics on current exhibits, museum collections metadata information, and the use of multimedia. The study of information seeking behavior of users groups of museum digital collections or cultural collections allows examination and analysis of users' information needs, and the organization of cultural information, including descriptive metadata and the quantity of information that may be required. In addition, the study delineates information needs that different categories of users may have in common: teachers in high schools, students in colleges and universities, museum professionals, art historians and researchers, and the general public. This research also compares informational and educational needs of real visitors with the needs of virtual visitors. Educational needs of real visitors are based on various studies conducted and summarized by Falk and Dierking (2000), and an evaluation of the art museum websites previously conducted to support the current study.

[1]  Elfreda A. Chatman,et al.  Using everyday life information seeking to explain organizational behavior , 2001 .

[2]  David Kenneth Berlo,et al.  The process of communication:an introduction to theory and practice , 1960 .

[3]  D. Lowenthal Stewarding the past in a perplexing present , 2000 .

[4]  D. Lowenthal Natural and cultural heritage , 2005 .

[5]  Richard Rinehart MOAC - A Report on Integrating Museum and Archive Access in the Online Archive of California , 2003, D Lib Mag..

[6]  Nadia Banna,et al.  Museum Education, History, Theory and Practice , 1991 .

[7]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  A profile of end‐user searching behavior by humanities scholars: The Getty Online Searching Project Report No. 2 , 1993 .

[8]  Sue Stone,et al.  Humanities scholars: Information Needs and Uses , 1982, J. Documentation.

[9]  John H. Falk,et al.  MUSEUMS AS INSTITUTIONS FOR PERSONAL LEARNING , 1999 .

[10]  Bonnie Reed,et al.  Information needs and library services for the Fine Arts faculty , 2001 .

[11]  R. Klassen,et al.  Experimental comparison of Web, electronic and mail survey technologies in operations management , 2001 .

[12]  K. J. Weintraub,et al.  The Humanistic Scholar and the Library , 1980, The Library Quarterly.

[13]  John Morgan,et al.  See What I Mean: An Introduction to Visual Communication , 1986 .

[14]  J. Falk,et al.  Learning from Museums: Visitor Experiences and the Making of Meaning , 2000 .

[15]  P. Howard,et al.  Research Methodology , 2000 .

[16]  Herschel Knapp,et al.  Using pencil and paper, Internet and touch-tone phones for self-administered surveys: does methodology matter? , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[18]  S. K. Hastings,et al.  Digital Image Managers for the New Millennium: A Museum/University Collaboration , 1999 .

[19]  Jane Klobas Research Methods for Students and Professionals: Information Management and Systems , 2001 .

[20]  Rune Pettersson Visuals for information : research and practice , 1989 .

[21]  Deborah N. Wilde,et al.  Research practices of humanities scholars in an online environment: The Getty online searching project report no. 3 , 1995 .

[22]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  The Mathematical Theory of Communication , 1950 .

[23]  Charles D. Dziuban,et al.  A Web-Based Survey System for Distributed Learning Impact Evaluation , 2000, Internet High. Educ..

[24]  Julian L. Simon,et al.  Basic research methods in social science , 1985 .

[25]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Multimedia Web searching trends: 1997-2001 , 2003, Inf. Process. Manag..

[26]  Jeff Passe,et al.  The Best Museum for Kids?– The One They Build Themselves! , 1998 .

[27]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  Netville Online and Offline , 1999 .

[28]  Harm J. G. Zwaga,et al.  Visual Information For Everyday Use : Design And Research Perspectives , 1999 .

[29]  June Abbas,et al.  User Reactions as Access Mechanism: An Exploration Based on Captions for Images , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[30]  Howard Besser The Next Stage: Moving from Isolated Digital Collections to Interoperable Digital Libraries , 2002, First Monday.

[31]  Erica Avrami,et al.  Values and heritage conservation , 2000 .

[32]  Scott Millard,et al.  The Columbia World of Quotations , 2004 .

[33]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  Document Familiarity, Relevance, and Bradford's Law: the Getty Online Searching Project Report Number 5 , 1996, Inf. Process. Manag..

[34]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Real life, real users, and real needs: a study and analysis of user queries on the web , 2000, Inf. Process. Manag..

[35]  Jennifer Jenson,et al.  Object Lessons: Towards an Educational Theory of Technology , 2002, First Monday.

[36]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Evaluating Digital Libraries: A Longitudinal and Multifaceted View , 2000, Libr. Trends.

[37]  Beth Sandore,et al.  Illinois Digital Cultural Heritage Community - Collaborative Interactions among Libraries, Museums and Elementary Schools , 2002, D Lib Mag..

[38]  Patrick Wilson,et al.  Public Knowledge, Private Ignorance: Toward a Library and Information Policy , 1977 .

[39]  Chava Nachmias,et al.  Research Methods in the Social Sciences , 1976 .

[40]  Samantha Kelly Hastings,et al.  Evaluation of Image Retrieval Systems: Role of User Feedback , 1999, Libr. Trends.

[41]  Clifford A. Lynch Digital Collections, Digital Libraries and the Digitization of Cultural Heritage Information , 2002, First Monday.

[42]  R. Havelock Planning for innovation through dissemi-nation and utilization of knowledge , 1969 .

[43]  Gregory R. Crane,et al.  Cultural Heritage Digital Libraries: Needs and Components , 2002, ECDL.

[44]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  The Getty End-User Online Searching Project in the Humanities: Report No. 6: Overview and Conclusions , 1996 .

[45]  Tefko Saracevic,et al.  Digital Library Evaluation: Toward Evolution of Concepts , 2000, Libr. Trends.

[46]  Susan Siegfried,et al.  An Analysis of Search Terminology Used by Humanities Scholars: The Getty Online Searching Project Report Number 1 , 1993, The Library Quarterly.

[47]  David Dawson,et al.  Standing on the shoulders of giants:efforts to leverage existing synergies in digital cultural content creation programmes world-wide , 2001 .

[48]  Yin Zhang Using the Internet for survey research: a case study , 2000 .

[49]  Paul Miller,et al.  Re-inventing the Wheel? Standards, Interoperability and Digital Cultural Content , 2002, D Lib Mag..

[50]  Fabio Paternò,et al.  Effective levels of adaptation to different types of users in interactive museum systems , 2000 .

[51]  Zane L. Berge,et al.  IPCT Journal readership survey , 1996 .

[52]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  THE DESIGN OF DATABASES AND OTHER INFORMATION RESOURCES FOR HUMANITIES SCHOLARS: THE GETTY ONLINE SEARCHING PROJECT REPORT NO. 4 , 1994 .

[53]  W. Schramm The process and effects of mass communication , 1954 .

[54]  Samantha Kelly Hastings Digital Image Managers: A Unique Partnership , 2000 .

[55]  Brian C. O'Connor Explorations in Indexing and Abstracting: Pointing, Virtue, and Power , 1996 .