Students’ use of asynchronous discussions for academic discourse socialization

Our universities are becoming increasingly diverse at the same time as online asynchronous discussions (OADs) are emerging as the most important forum for computer mediated communication (CMC) in distance education. But there is shortage of studies that explore how graduate students from different ethnic, linguistic and cultural backgrounds use OADs for academic discourse socialization. This article discusses a qualitative study conducted to address these issues. Language socialization and community of practice theories informed the study. Analyses of surveys, interviews, and Blackboard postings from seven hybrid courses reveal that participants perceived OADs highly positively and used them as a virtual community for academic and professional discourse socialization and appropriation. Findings also suggest that students experienced some frustrations and disappointments regarding professorial presence and grading. We discuss these findings, show how academic and professional discourse socialization occurs in asynchronous virtual reality, and draw implications for further research and practice.

[1]  B. Rogoff.  Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship , 1995 .

[2]  Academic language and literacy socialization through project-based instruction: ESL student perspectives and issues , 2005 .

[3]  Gayle J. Yaverbaum,et al.  Asynchronous Computer-mediated Communication versus Face-to-face Collaboration: Results on Student Learning, Quality and Satisfaction , 1999 .

[4]  Senem Yildiz,et al.  Exploring electronic forum participation and interaction by efl speakers in two web-based graduate-level courses , 2003 .

[5]  Hj Norussis,et al.  SPSS for Windows , 1993 .

[6]  Lia D. Kamhi-Stein,et al.  Looking to the Future of TESOL Teacher Education: Web-Based Bulletin Board Discussions in a Methods Course , 2000 .

[7]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course , 2000 .

[8]  M. J. W. Thomas,et al.  Learning within incoherent structures: the space of online discussion forums , 2002, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[9]  D. Garrison,et al.  Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[10]  Qiuyun Lin.  Student satisfactions in four mixed courses in elementary teacher education program , 2008 .

[11]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[12]  Paula Menyuk,et al.  Language Socialization Across Cultures. , 1989 .

[13]  Catherine McLoughlin,et al.  Learner Support in Distance and Networked Learning Environments: Ten Dimensions for Successful Design , 2002 .

[14]  S. Heath.  Ways with Words: Language, Life and Work in Communities and Classrooms , 1983 .

[15]  I. E. Allen,et al.  Blending In The Extent and Promise of Blended Education in the United States , 2007 .

[16]  N. Hoffart.  Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[17]  Martha M. Snyder,et al.  Facilitating discourse and enhancing teaching presence: Using mini audio presentations in online forums , 2010, Internet High. Educ..

[18]  A. Twycross.  Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches Creswell John W Sage 320 £29 0761924426 0761924426 [Formula: see text]. , 2004, Nurse researcher.

[19]  Robin Mason.  Home Computing Evaluation. Use of CoSy on DT200, 1989. CITE Report No. 99. , 1990 .

[20]  Michael H. Harris,et al.  Is the revolution now over, or has it just begun? A year of the internet in higher education , 1998, Internet High. Educ..

[21]  A Villers Ruiz,et al.  Statistical package for the social sciences (spss) , 1981 .

[22]  D. Potts.  Pedagogy, Purpose, and the Second Language Learner in On-Line Communities , 2005 .

[23]  D. Garrison,et al.  The Development of a Community of Inquiry over Time in an Online Course: Understanding the Progression and Integration of Social, Cognitive and Teaching Presence. , 2008 .

[24]  Holly H. Robbins,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Preservice Teachers' Reflective Thinking in Synchronous Versus Asynchronous , 2006 .

[25]  M. Warschauer.  Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice. , 1997 .

[26]  Emily E. Marsh.  ATLAS.ti, The Knowledge Workbench , 2001 .

[27]  유창조.  Naturalistic Inquiry , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[28]  Nada Dabbagh,et al.  How to structure online discussions for meaningful discourse: a case study , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[29]  S. Heath,et al.  Ways with Words: Language, Life and Work in Communities and Classrooms , 1983 .

[30]  M. Pedler.  Developing the learning community , 1981 .

[31]  N. Morita.  Discourse Socialization Through Oral Classroom Activities in a TESL Graduate Program , 2000 .

[32]  Virginia Roach,et al.  Satisfaction with Online Learning: A Comparative Descriptive Study. , 2006 .

[33]  David Labaree.  The Peculiar Problems of Preparing Educational Researchers , 2003 .

[34]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[35]  Bambi B. Schieffelin,et al.  Language Socialization across Cultures , 1988 .

[36]  Karen Swan,et al.  Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses , 2001 .

[37]  Paige Ware,et al.  Confidence and competition online: ESL student perspectives on web-based discussions in the classroom , 2004 .

[38]  Laurie P. Dringus,et al.  Temporal transitions in participation flow in an asynchronous discussion forum , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[39]  Elie Holzer.  Professional Development of Teacher Educators in Asynchronous Electronic Environment: Challenges, Opportunities and Preliminary Insights from Practice , 2004 .

[40]  Anthony G. Picciano.  BLENDING WITH PURPOSE: THE MULTIMODAL MODEL , 2009, Online Learning.

[41]  Camille Johnson-Yale,et al.  Academic work, the Internet and U.S. college students , 2008, Internet High. Educ..

[42]  Gulbahar H. Beckett,et al.  The Project Framework: a tool for language, content, and skills integration , 2005 .

[43]  Lara L. Lomicka,et al.  Developing Collaborative Cyber Communities to Prepare Tomorrow's Teachers , 2004 .