Managing Performance at Local Government Level: The Cases of the City of Brisbane and the City of Melbourne

Local governments have been involved in a continuous reform process during recent decades. In many cases, this process has focused on the introduction of performance measurement and management. Reforms have evolved from the mere use of indicators to integrated management systems. In this article, the Balanced Scorecard, a system designed to answer the need for integrated management systems, is used as the framework to analyse how local governments have managed the use of performance management systems. The demands for better public performance, for greater customer focus, for enhanced decision-making and for increased responsiveness have an important role in the design of performance management systems. In addition, a perceived crisis in the area of management can act as catalyst for the implementation.

[1]  Arie Halachmi,et al.  Performance measurement is only one way of managing performance , 2005 .

[2]  C. Hood.  The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme , 1995 .

[3]  F. Naschold.  Learning from the pioneers: Modernizing local government. Part one , 1999 .

[4]  Hans de Bruijn,et al.  Performance measurement in the public sector: strategies to cope with the risks of performance measurement , 2002 .

[5]  L. R. Jones,et al.  ASSESSING PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REFORM IN AN INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT , 2003 .

[6]  Thomas L. Albright,et al.  An investigation of the effect of Balanced Scorecard implementation on financial performance , 2004 .

[7]  P. Julnes,et al.  Promoting the Utilization of Performance Measures in Public Organizations: An Empirical Study of Factors Affecting Adoption and Implementation , 2001 .

[8]  Steven Jones.  Improving Local Government Performance: One Step Forward not Two Steps Back , 2004 .

[9]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system , 1996 .

[10]  David Otley,et al.  The Design and Use of Management Control Systems: An Extended Framework for Analysis , 2005 .

[11]  A. Halachmi.  Performance Measurement, Accountability, and Improved Performance , 2002 .

[12]  Christopher D. Ittner,et al.  Implementing Performance Measurement Innovations: Evidence from Government , 2004 .

[13]  S. van Thiel,et al.  The Performance Paradox in the Public Sector , 2002 .

[14]  Wayne Cameron,et al.  Public accountability: Effectiveness, equity, ethics , 2004 .

[15]  J. Guthrie,et al.  Accrual Output Based Budgeting Systems in Australia: The Rhetoric-Reality Gap , 2003 .

[16]  Annette Boaz,et al.  The Modernization and Improvement of Government and Public Services: Public Participation and Citizen-Centred Local Government: Lessons from the Best Value and Better Government for Older People Pilot Programmes , 2000 .

[17]  David N. Ammons.  Overcoming the Inadequacies of Performance Measurement in Local Government: The Case of Libraries and Leisure Services , 1995 .

[18]  R. Anderson,et al.  Performance Information, Accountability and Executive Agencies , 1998 .

[19]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[20]  D. Larcker,et al.  Innovations in Performance Measurement: Trends and Research Implications , 1998 .

[21]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The strategy-focused organization , 2000 .

[22]  David N. Ammons.  Performance Measurement and Managerial Thinking , 2002 .

[23]  Hanne Nørreklit.  The Balance on the Balanced Scorecard: A Critical Analysis of Some of Its Assumptions , 2000 .

[24]  Hanne Nørreklit.  The Balanced Scorecard: what is the score? A rhetorical analysis of the Balanced Scorecard , 2003 .

[25]  Rodney McAdam,et al.  Performance management in the UK public sector: Addressing multiple stakeholder complexity , 2005 .

[26]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[27]  David N. Ammons,et al.  Performance-Comparison Projects in Local Government: Participants' Perspectives , 2001 .

[28]  M. Wisniewski,et al.  Using the statutory audit to support continuous improvement in Scottish local authorities , 2001 .

[29]  D. Larcker,et al.  Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators of financial performance? An analysis of customer satisfaction , 1998 .

[30]  K. Young.  Local Public Service Agreements and Performance Incentives for Local Government , 2005 .

[31]  L. Torres,et al.  Reshaping Public Sector Accounting: An International Comparative View , 2009 .

[32]  Marc Holzer,et al.  Public performance measurement , 2005 .

[33]  Irvine Lapsley,et al.  The Diffusion of Accounting Practices in the New 'Managerial' Public Sector , 2003 .

[34]  David Otley,et al.  Performance Management: A Framework for Management Control Systems Research , 1999 .

[35]  Jean E. Harris,et al.  Toward a Theory of Performance Reporting to Achieve Public Sector Accountability: A Field Study , 2005 .

[36]  S. Burgess,et al.  The Role of Incentives in the Public Sector: Issues and Evidence , 2003 .

[37]  R. Scapens.  Researching management accounting practice: The role of case study methods , 1990 .

[38]  D. Moynihan,et al.  Why Reforms do not Always Have to “Work” to Succeed , 2002 .

[39]  Dale Quinlivan.  Rescaling the balanced scorecard for local government , 2000 .

[40]  L. Torres.  Accounting and accountability: recent developments in government financial information systems† , 2004 .

[41]  Rodney McAdam,et al.  An Inquiry into Balanced Scorecards within Best Value Implementation in UK Local Government , 2003 .

[42]  G. Carnegie.  Promoting Accountability in Municipalities , 2005 .

[43]  Mary A. Malina,et al.  Communicating and Controlling Strategy: An Empirical Study of the Effectiveness of the Balanced Scorecard , 2001 .

[44]  Ad Kleingeld,et al.  Multilevel design of performance measurement systems: enhancing strategic dialogue throughout the organization☆ , 1999 .

[45]  A. Atkinson,et al.  A Stakeholder Approach to Strategic Performance Measurement , 1997 .

[46]  Lourdes Torres,et al.  Service Charters: Reshaping Trust in Government—The Case of Spain , 2005 .

[47]  K. Schedler,et al.  Dialogue on Definition and Evolution of the Field of Public Management , 2003 .