Towards evidence based research

To avoid waste of research, no new studies should be done without a systematic review of existing evidence, argue Hans Lund and colleagues

[1]  Richard Horton,et al.  Putting clinical trials into context , 2005, The Lancet.

[2]  Sally Hopewell,et al.  Reports of clinical trials should begin and end with up-to-date systematic reviews of other relevant evidence: a status report. , 2007, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[3]  Tari Turner,et al.  Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap , 2014, PLoS medicine.

[4]  T. Jefferson,et al.  Peer Review in Health Sciences , 1999 .

[5]  U. Siebert,et al.  When is enough evidence enough? - Using systematic decision analysis and value-of-information analysis to determine the need for further evidence. , 2013, Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen.

[6]  M. Munafo,et al.  Citation Distortions in the Literature on the Serotonin-Transporter-Linked Polymorphic Region and Amygdala Activation , 2015, Biological Psychiatry.

[7]  Nicola J Cooper,et al.  The use of systematic reviews when designing studies , 2005, Clinical trials.

[8]  Steven A Greenberg,et al.  How citation distortions create unfounded authority: analysis of a citation network , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  A. Oxman,et al.  The origins, evolution, and future of The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews , 2009, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[10]  H. Bastian,et al.  Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? , 2010, PLoS medicine.

[11]  S. Goodman,et al.  A Systematic Examination of the Citation of Prior Research in Reports of Randomized, Controlled Trials , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[12]  C. Juhl,et al.  Systematic reviews and research waste , 2016, The Lancet.

[13]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  The role of trust and authority in the citation behaviour of researchers , 2015, Inf. Res..

[14]  K. Mahtani.  All health researchers should begin their training by preparing at least one systematic review , 2016, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[15]  Rustam Al-Shahi Salman,et al.  Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management , 2014, The Lancet.

[16]  Mike Clarke,et al.  Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals. , 2002, JAMA.

[17]  P. Glasziou,et al.  Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence , 2009, The Lancet.

[18]  M. Tramèr,et al.  Ability of a meta-analysis to prevent redundant research: systematic review of studies on pain from propofol injection , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  R. Horton,et al.  Further emphasis on research in context , 2014, The Lancet.

[20]  David Moher,et al.  Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research , 2014, The Lancet.

[21]  K. Thorlund,et al.  Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[22]  Mike Clarke,et al.  Accumulating Research: A Systematic Account of How Cumulative Meta-Analyses Would Have Provided Knowledge, Improved Health, Reduced Harm and Saved Resources , 2014, PloS one.

[23]  G. Guyatt,et al.  When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[24]  N. Simunovic,et al.  Poor citation of prior evidence in hip fracture trials. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  K. Robinson,et al.  Biased and inadequate citation of prior research in reports of cardiovascular trials is a continuing source of waste in research. , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[26]  L. Sherman,et al.  Evidence-based justice , 2005, The Lancet.

[27]  Sally Hopewell,et al.  Clinical trials should begin and end with systematic reviews of relevant evidence: 12 years and waiting , 2010, The Lancet.

[28]  T Treasure,et al.  Clinical reports of pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer: a citation network analysis , 2011, British Journal of Cancer.

[29]  Paul J. Wang,et al.  Association Between Success Rate and Citation Count of Studies of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Possible Evidence of Citation Bias , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[30]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  Research: increasing value, reducing waste 2 , 2014 .

[31]  U. Dirnagl,et al.  Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste , 2014, The Lancet.

[32]  I Chalmers,et al.  Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals: islands in search of continents? , 1998, JAMA.

[33]  Brian Hutton,et al.  Randomized controlled trials of aprotinin in cardiac surgery: could clinical equipoise have stopped the bleeding? , 2005, Clinical trials.

[34]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis , 2014, The Lancet.

[35]  D. Moher,et al.  The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews , 2012, Systematic Reviews.

[36]  Kay Dickersin,et al.  Registering clinical trials. , 2003, JAMA.

[37]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Living cumulative network meta-analysis to reduce waste in research: A paradigmatic shift for systematic reviews? , 2016, BMC Medicine.

[38]  I. Chalmers.  Academia's failure to support systematic reviews , 2005, The Lancet.

[39]  T. Perneger,et al.  Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[40]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research , 2014, The Lancet.