Accelerated two- and three-dimensional cine MR imaging of the heart by using a 32-channel coil.

PURPOSE To compare accelerated real-time two-dimensional (2D) and segmented three-dimensional (3D) cine steady-state free precession magnetic resonance (MR) imaging techniques by using a 32-channel coil with a conventional 2D cine imaging approach for imaging the heart and to evaluate any difference caused by free breathing and breath holding for real-time imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this institutional review board-approved HIPAA-compliant study, 10 healthy volunteers and 22 consecutive patients who were suspected of having or were known to have heart disease underwent cardiac MR imaging by using a 32-channel coil. A conventional multisection 2D real-time cine sequence was used as the reference standard, and three additional accelerated cine sequences were implemented. Volumetric parameters, including ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume(SV), and myocardial mass, were derived. Wall motion and image quality were assessed by two radiologists. In addition, image time was registered. An additional set of images was acquired by using real-time sequences with free breathing, and quantitative measurements were compared with measurements on images obtained with breath holding. For quantitative analysis, repeated-measures analysis of variance, paired t test, and Bland-Altman analysis were used; for qualitative analysis, nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used. RESULTS All volumetric measurements were significantly correlated with those of the standard sequence (r > 0.80, P < .01). No significant difference among protocols was observed in terms of mean levels for EF or ESV (P > .05). However, a significant difference was indicated for EDV and SV (P < .01).The accelerated protocols had significantly shorter image times (P < .001). Wall motion scores were concordant with the standard sequence in 43-44 (93%-96%) segments for the accelerated protocols, with a strong interreader agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient, > or =0.93). No significant difference was identified between real-time protocols with free breathing and those with breath holding for measurement of volumetric parameters. CONCLUSION Accelerated real-time 2D and segmented 3D cine techniques are comparable to the standard clinical protocol in assessment of left ventricular global and regional parameters in substantially shorter image times.

[1]  A. Weissler,et al.  Systolic Time Intervals in Heart Failure in Man , 1968, Circulation.

[2]  R M Whitlock,et al.  Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. , 1987, Circulation.

[3]  D. Levy,et al.  Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  D. Pennell,et al.  Quantification of Right and Left Ventricular Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance , 2000, Herz.

[5]  O. Simonetti,et al.  Cine MR angiography of the heart with segmented true fast imaging with steady-state precession. , 2001, Radiology.

[6]  K. Scheffler,et al.  Single‐breathhold 3D‐trueFISP cine cardiac imaging , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  Orlando P Simonetti,et al.  Cardiac function: MR evaluation in one breath hold with real-time true fast imaging with steady-state precession. , 2002, Radiology.

[8]  M. Cerqueira,et al.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. , 2002, Circulation.

[9]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Mark E Ladd,et al.  Assessment of ventricular function with single breath-hold real-time steady-state free precession cine MR imaging. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  J Paul Finn,et al.  MR Imaging of the heart with cine true fast imaging with steady-state precession: influence of spatial and temporal resolutions on left ventricular functional parameters. , 2002, Radiology.

[12]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Single breath-hold real-time cine MR imaging: improved temporal resolution using generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition (GRAPPA) algorithm , 2003, European Radiology.

[13]  Daniel B Ennis,et al.  3D breath‐held cardiac function with projection reconstruction in steady state free precession validated using 2D cine MRI , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  Nicole Heussen,et al.  Assessment of myocardial function with interactive non-breath-hold real-time MR imaging: comparison with echocardiography and breath-hold Cine MR imaging. , 2004, Radiology.

[15]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  Accelerating cardiac cine 3D imaging using k‐t BLAST , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  Peter Hunold,et al.  Parallel acquisition techniques in cardiac cine magnetic resonance imaging using TrueFISP sequences: Comparison of image quality and artifacts , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  Thoralf Niendorf,et al.  Highly parallel volumetric imaging with a 32‐element RF coil array , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  R. Lookstein,et al.  Time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography as a noninvasive method to characterize endoleaks: initial results compared with conventional angiography. , 2004, Journal of vascular surgery.

[19]  R. Felix,et al.  Myocardial viability assessment in patients with highly impaired left ventricular function: comparison of delayed enhancement, dobutamine stress MRI, end-diastolic wall thickness, and TI201-SPECT with functional recovery after revascularization , 2005, European Radiology.

[20]  B. Sievers,et al.  Impact of the ECG gating method on ventricular volumes and ejection fractions assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[21]  Bob S. Hu,et al.  Single‐breathhold, four‐dimensional, quantitative assessment of LV and RV function using triggered, real‐time, steady‐state free precession MRI in heart failure patients , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[22]  Peter Kellman,et al.  Dynamic autocalibrated parallel imaging using temporal GRAPPA (TGRAPPA) , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  Raja Muthupillai,et al.  Fast 3D cine steady-state free precession imaging with sensitivity encoding for assessment of left ventricular function in a single breath-hold. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Cardiac CINE MR imaging with a 32‐channel cardiac coil and parallel imaging: Impact of acceleration factors on image quality and volumetric accuracy , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[25]  H. Schild,et al.  Cardiac stress MR imaging with dobutamine , 2006, European Radiology.

[26]  Sebastian Kozerke,et al.  Accelerated CMR using zonal, parallel and prior knowledge driven imaging methods , 2008, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[27]  Yasuo Amano,et al.  Evaluation of global cardiac functional parameters using single-breath-hold three-dimensional cine steady-state free precession MR imaging with two types of speed-up techniques: Comparison with two-dimensional cine imaging , 2008, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[28]  E. Nagel,et al.  Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols, society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance: board of trustees task force on standardized protocols , 2008, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[29]  Peter Kellman,et al.  Fully automatic, retrospective enhancement of real‐time acquired cardiac cine MR images using image‐based navigators and respiratory motion‐corrected averaging , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  A study of in vitro and in vivo MR of free-breathing whole-heart 3D coronary angiography using parallel imaging , 2009, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[31]  Vivek Muthurangu,et al.  Feasibility and reproducibility of biventricular volumetric assessment of cardiac function during exercise using real‐time radial k‐t SENSE magnetic resonance imaging , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.