Arduous implementation: Does the Normalisation Process Model explain why it's so difficult to embed decision support technologies for patients in routine clinical practice

[1]  D. J. Cain.  Person-Centered Psychotherapies , 2010 .

[2]  G. Elwyn,et al.  Advocating Mandatory Patient ‘Autonomy’ in Healthcare: Adverse Reactions and Side Effects , 2008, Health Care Analysis.

[3]  G. Elwyn,et al.  Where is the theory? Evaluating the theoretical frameworks described in decision support technologies. , 2008, Patient education and counseling.

[4]  S. Campbell,et al.  Beyond the limits of clinical governance? The case of mental health in English primary care , 2008, BMC health services research.

[5]  H. Richards,et al.  Adoption of telemedicine in Scottish remote and rural general practices: a qualitative study , 2007, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[6]  G. Elwyn,et al.  Respecting the subjective: quality measurement from the patient's perspective , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  Peter Bower,et al.  Support for self care for patients with chronic disease , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  Elizabeth Murray,et al.  Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model , 2007, BMC Health Services Research.

[9]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  Toward a Model for Field-Testing Patient Decision-Support Technologies: A Qualitative Field-Testing Study , 2007, Journal of medical Internet research.

[10]  A. Coulter,et al.  Prominent strategy but rare in practice: shared decision-making and patient decision support technologies in the UK. , 2007, Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung und Qualitatssicherung.

[11]  J. Gunn,et al.  GPs' use of problem solving therapy for depression: a qualitative study of barriers to and enablers of evidence based care , 2007, BMC family practice.

[12]  M. Marshall,et al.  Is the metaphor of 'barriers to change' useful in understanding implementation? Evidence from general medical practice , 2007, Journal of health services research & policy.

[13]  T. Finch,et al.  Teledermatology in the U.K.: lessons in service innovation , 2007, The British journal of dermatology.

[14]  Karen R. Sepucha,et al.  An approach to measuring the quality of breast cancer decisions. , 2007, Patient education and counseling.

[15]  Richard Thomson,et al.  Medical communication and technology: a video-based process study of the use of decision aids in primary care consultations , 2007, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[16]  M. Eccles,et al.  Planning and Studying Improvement in Patient Care: The Use of Theoretical Perspectives , 2007, The Milbank quarterly.

[17]  Karen R. Sepucha,et al.  Understanding treatment decision making: Contexts, commonalities, complexities, and challenges , 2006, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[18]  B. Moulton,et al.  Rethinking Informed Consent: The Case for Shared Medical Decision-Making , 2006, American Journal of Law & Medicine.

[19]  France Légaré,et al.  Primary health care professionals' views on barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework in practice. , 2006, Patient education and counseling.

[20]  William R. King,et al.  A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[21]  Dawn Stacey,et al.  Adoption and sustainability of decision support for patients facing health decisions: an implementation case study in nursing , 2006, Implementation science : IS.

[22]  Aileen Clarke,et al.  Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[23]  F. Légaré,et al.  Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions , 2006, Implementation science : IS.

[24]  C. May.  A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care , 2006, BMC Health Services Research.

[25]  D. Maynard,et al.  Problems and Prospects in the Study of Physician-Patient Interaction: 30 Years of Research , 2006 .

[26]  France Légaré,et al.  Impact of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework on the Agreement and the Difference between Patients' and Physicians' Decisional Conflict , 2006, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[27]  Carl May,et al.  Doctor-patient interaction in a randomised controlled trial of decision-support tools. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[28]  M. Holmes-Rovner,et al.  Integrating Decision Making and Mental Health Interventions Research: Research Directions. , 2006, Clinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association.

[29]  Tiago Moreira,et al.  Technogovernance: evidence, subjectivity, and the clinical encounter in primary care medicine. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[30]  Kouhei Akazawa,et al.  Profit and loss analysis for an intensive care unit (ICU) in Japan: a tool for strategic management , 2006, BMC Health Services Research.

[31]  Anand Jeyaraj,et al.  A review of the predictors, linkages, and biases in IT innovation adoption research , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[32]  A. O'Connor,et al.  Barriers and facilitators influencing call center nurses' decision support for callers facing values-sensitive decisions: a mixed methods study. , 2005, Worldviews on evidence-based nursing.

[33]  C. Charles,et al.  Treatment decision aids: conceptual issues and future directions , 2005, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[34]  G. Elwyn,et al.  The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision‐making tasks , 2005, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[35]  Amiram Gafni,et al.  Self‐reported use of shared decision‐making among breast cancer specialists and perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing this approach , 2004, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[36]  G. Robert,et al.  Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. , 2004, The Milbank quarterly.

[37]  L. Gask.  Powerlessness, Control, and Complexity: The Experience of Family Physicians in a Group Model HMO , 2004, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[38]  Nicole Woolsey Biggart,et al.  THE ECONOMIC SOCIOLOGY OF CONVENTIONS: Habit, Custom, Practice, and Routine in Market Order , 2003 .

[39]  Deb Feldman-Stewart,et al.  Validation of a Decision Regret Scale , 2003, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[40]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  The development of COMRADE--a patient-based outcome measure to evaluate the effectiveness of risk communication and treatment decision making in consultations. , 2003, Patient education and counseling.

[41]  France Légaré,et al.  The effect of decision aids on the agreement between women's and physicians' decisional conflict about hormone replacement therapy. , 2003, Patient education and counseling.

[42]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  Manufactured but not imported: new directions for research in shared decision making support and skills. , 2003, Patient education and counseling.

[43]  D. Armstrong,et al.  Clinical autonomy, individual and collective: the problem of changing doctors' behaviour. , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[44]  G. Therborn.  Back to Norms! on the Scope and Dynamics of Norms and Normative Action , 2002 .

[45]  P. Tate,et al.  Patient centredness in the MRCGP video examination: analysis of large cohort , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[46]  R. McKendry,et al.  Challenges in family practice related to informed and shared decision-making: a survey of preceptors of medical students. , 2001, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[47]  P Kinnersley,et al.  Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. , 2000, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[48]  B. McKinstry.  Do patients wish to be involved in decision making in the consultation? A cross sectional survey with video vignettes , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[49]  Margaret Holmes-Rovner,et al.  Implementing shared decision‐making in routine practice: barriers and opportunities , 2000, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[50]  G. Annas,et al.  The Practice of Autonomy: Patients, Doctors, and Medical Decisions , 2000 .

[51]  W. Levinson,et al.  Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. , 1999, JAMA.

[52]  C. Schneider.  The Practice of Autonomy: Patients, Doctors, and Medical Decisions , 1998 .

[53]  M. Holmes-Rovner,et al.  Patient Satisfaction with Health Care Decisions , 1996, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[54]  T. Quill,et al.  Nonabandonment: A Central Obligation for Physicians , 1995, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[55]  James Robert Brown,et al.  The Laboratory of the Mind: Thought Experiments in the Natural Sciences , 1993 .

[56]  J. Coleman,et al.  Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. , 1967 .

[57]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[58]  Faye Flintoff.  Time to get back to basics. , 2006, Nursing New Zealand.

[59]  R. Thomson,et al.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[60]  Ernst Mach,et al.  On Thought Experiments , 1976 .

[61]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .